search for: openzf

...d "ea support = yes" but it seems to have no effect on > > that. > > Googling for XAT_OFFLINE or XAT_ONLINE doesn't return anything. Yeh, my Googlefu is better than somebody who works for Google ;-) It seems to be something to do with ZFS on illumos: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/blob/master/usr/src/uts/common/fs/xattr.c Rowland > > Do you mean the Windows FILE_ATTRIBUTE_OFFLINE attribute ? > > If so, yes, we support that if the server is using dmapi. >

...ct similar false claims. If you don't like those > discussions > at all, you should try to avoid false claims and the need for corrections. > If I were RedHat, including a non GPL filesystem into my operating system would make me sweat a bit. Intel were facing a similar issue bundling OpenZFS with Lustre in their Intel Enterprise Edition for Lustre. They seem to have solved it by having the installer download the OpenZFS package during installation time.

I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what is the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with the ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, political, etc? Although btrfs is making progress, ZFS is far more mature, has a few more stable features (especially Raid-z3) and has worked flawlessly for me on CentOS-6 and Scientific Linux-6. I used ZFS for a couple of large file servers with no problems. The...

...wrote: >>> Chuck Munro <chuckm at seafoam.net> wrote: >>> >>>> I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what is >>>> the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with the >>>> ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, political, etc? >>> >>> There is no licensing issue, but there are OpenSource enemies that spread a >>> fairy tale about an alleged licensing issue. >>> >>> The only problem with integrating ZFS into Linux is that the VFS in...

On 06/01/2015 06:42 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Chuck Munro <chuckm at seafoam.net> wrote: > >> I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what is >> the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with the >> ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, political, etc? > > There is no licensing issue, but there are OpenSource enemies that spread a > fairy tale about an alleged licensing issue. > > The only problem with integrating ZFS into Linux is that the VFS interface from > Linux is inferior t...

...n't like those > > discussions > > at all, you should try to avoid false claims and the need for corrections. > > > > If I were RedHat, including a non GPL filesystem into my operating system > would make me sweat a bit. Intel were facing a similar issue bundling > OpenZFS with Lustre in their Intel Enterprise Edition for Lustre. They seem > to have solved it by having the installer download the OpenZFS package > during installation time. There is no need to do it this way.... Note that it is without doubt that ZFS was not derived from the Linux kernel and...

Hello, Does Samba support XAT_OFFLINE and XAT_ONLINE extended attribute? I have enabled "ea support = yes" but it seems to have no effect on that. Thanks Andrea

...) the server is an AD member server and 2) the map* parameters don't do the right thing under ZFS / NFSV4 ACLs. I've read that the steps Klaus Hartnegg listed resolves the issue on ZFS on Linux; however, I don't believe that SA based xattrs have been implemented in ZFS on FreeBSD (the OpenZFS website has "??" next to FreeBSD). Atime is already disabled on the zpool. At this point I'll have to wait until I get a proper testing environment set up to do proper experimentation / troubleshooting. -----Original Message----- From: Klaus Hartnegg [mailto:hartnegg at uni-freib...

...oglefu is better than somebody who works for Google ;-) > Oh the shame, the shame :-). Having said that I am at > a conference and really should be paying attention to the > lectures :-). > >> It seems to be something to do with ZFS on illumos: >> >> https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/blob/master/usr/src/uts/common/fs/xattr.c > Thnaks Rowland, I'll take a look ! >

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 07:51:58AM -0700, Chuck Munro wrote: > I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what > is the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with > the ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, > political, etc? > > Although btrfs is making progress, ZFS is far more mature, has a few > more stable features (especially Raid-z3) and has worked flawlessly > for me on CentOS-6 and Scientific Linux-6. I used ZFS for a couple > of large file serv...

Once upon a time, Chuck Munro <chuckm at seafoam.net> said: > I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what > is the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with > the ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, > political, etc? Licensing. Sun chose an Open Source license that is incompatible with the GPLv2 as used by the Linux kernel, so it is not legally possible to distribute a combined work of the kernel and the Sun ZFS code (at least that's the opinion of a numbe...

Chuck Munro <chuckm at seafoam.net> wrote: > I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what is > the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with the > ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, political, etc? There is no licensing issue, but there are OpenSource enemies that spread a fairy tale about an alleged licensing issue. The only problem with integrating ZFS into Linux is that the VFS interface from Linux is inferior to the one from OpenSolaris and...

...oerg Schilling wrote: > > Chuck Munro <chuckm at seafoam.net> wrote: > > > >> I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what is > >> the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with the > >> ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, political, etc? > > > > There is no licensing issue, but there are OpenSource enemies that spread a > > fairy tale about an alleged licensing issue. > > > > The only problem with integrating ZFS into Linux is that the VFS interface from...

As if last weekend's UEFI debacle wasn't bad enough, it now seems the latest C8 kernel (4.18.0-193.14.2) is incompatible with the current ZFSOnLinux packages (0.8.4-1). When booted to the latest kernel, ZFS is inaccessible on my C8 storage server. When I back off to the prior kernel (4.18.0-193.6.3), all is well. If a local ZFS system is unavailable to the C8 kernel support folks,

...s not a daily task for most of us, so that we tend to forget commands, since we haven?t used them in months. It is a major feature of a filesystem to have commands you can guess correctly based on fuzzy memories of having used them once months ago. > Canonical appears to be charging ahead with OpenZFS included by > default out of the box (although not for rootfs yet I guess) Correct. ZFS-on-root-on-Ubuntu is still an unholy mess: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/Ubuntu > I can't tell you for sure what ZoL's faulty device behavior is > either, whether it ejects fau...

...latform * CloudABI: Running Untrusted Programs Directly on top of FreeBSD * Improvements to Non-Transparent Bridge Subsystem * The Graphics Stack on FreeBSD * Using lld, the LLVM Linker, to Link FreeBSD * VirtualBox Shared Folders Filesystem * ZFS Code Sync with Latest OpenZFS/Illumos Kernel * evdev Support * FreeBSD Driver for the Annapurna Labs ENA * FreeBSD on Hyper-V and Azure * Timekeeping Code Improvements Google Summer of Code * Google Summer of Code 2016 * Non-BSM to BSM Conversion Tools * ptnet Driver and bhyve Device Mode...

...latform * CloudABI: Running Untrusted Programs Directly on top of FreeBSD * Improvements to Non-Transparent Bridge Subsystem * The Graphics Stack on FreeBSD * Using lld, the LLVM Linker, to Link FreeBSD * VirtualBox Shared Folders Filesystem * ZFS Code Sync with Latest OpenZFS/Illumos Kernel * evdev Support * FreeBSD Driver for the Annapurna Labs ENA * FreeBSD on Hyper-V and Azure * Timekeeping Code Improvements Google Summer of Code * Google Summer of Code 2016 * Non-BSM to BSM Conversion Tools * ptnet Driver and bhyve Device Mode...

...table it will be years before it has "rough ZFS features" and again estimating bootloader support, and to what degree other distros pick up on it, it very well could end up being widely adopted, or it could be a Red Hat only thing in practice. Canonical appears to be charging ahead with OpenZFS included by default out of the box (although not for rootfs yet I guess), and that has an open ended and possibly long window before legal issues get tested. But this is by far the most cross platform solution: FreeBSD, Illumos, Linux, macOS. And ZoL has RHEL/CentOS specific packages. But I can...

On up-to-date f36, with latest kernel 6.1.7-100.fc36.x86_64. After receiving a few of these messages Broadcast message from nut at e7.eyal.emu.id.au (somewhere) UPS ups at ups is unavailable I noticed and ran sudo systemctl restart nut-driver at ups.service which triggered Broadcast message from nut at e7.eyal.emu.id.au (somewhere) Communications with UPS ups at ups established I now added