search for: openresti

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Marcus Rueckert <darix at opensu.se> wrote: > On 2017-09-27 16:57:44 +0000, Mark Moseley wrote: > > I've been digging into the auth policy stuff with weakforced lately. > There > > are cases (IP ranges, so could be wrapped up in remote {} blocks) where > > it'd be nice to skip the auth policy (internal hosts that I can trust,

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > On 27.09.2017 20:14, Mark Moseley wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Marcus Rueckert <darix at opensu.se> > wrote: > > > >> On 2017-09-27 16:57:44 +0000, Mark Moseley wrote: > >>> I've been digging into the auth policy stuff with weakforced

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > On September 28, 2017 at 7:20 PM Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 27.09.2017 20:14, Mark Moseley

On 27.09.2017 20:14, Mark Moseley wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Marcus Rueckert <darix at opensu.se> wrote: > >> On 2017-09-27 16:57:44 +0000, Mark Moseley wrote: >>> I've been digging into the auth policy stuff with weakforced lately. >> There >>> are cases (IP ranges, so could be wrapped up in remote {} blocks) where >>>

On Thursday 11 of January 2018, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Seems we might've made a unexpected change here when we revamped the ssl > code. Revamped, interesting, can it support milions certs now on single machine? (so are certs loaded by demand and not wasting memory) > Aki -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )

I've been digging into the auth policy stuff with weakforced lately. There are cases (IP ranges, so could be wrapped up in remote {} blocks) where it'd be nice to skip the auth policy (internal hosts that I can trust, but that are hitting the same servers as the outside world). Is there any way to disable auth policy, possibly inside a remote{}? auth_policy_server_url complains that it

> On September 28, 2017 at 7:20 PM Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > > > > > On 27.09.2017 20:14, Mark Moseley wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Marcus Rueckert <darix at opensu.se> > > wrote: > > > >

On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 04:13:12PM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote: > On 2023/3/8 15:14, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 14:59:36 +0800, Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng at huawei.com> wrote: > >> On 2023/3/8 10:49, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > >>> If the queue of xdp xmit is not an independent queue, then when the xdp > >>> xmit used all the desc, the xmit from

If the queue of xdp xmit is not an independent queue, then when the xdp xmit used all the desc, the xmit from the __dev_queue_xmit() may encounter the following error. net ens4: Unexpected TXQ (0) queue failure: -28 This patch adds a check whether sq is full in XDP Xmit. Thanks. Xuan Zhuo (2): virtio_net: separate the logic of checking whether sq is full virtio_net: add checking sq is full

If the queue of xdp xmit is not an independent queue, then when the xdp xmit used all the desc, the xmit from the __dev_queue_xmit() may encounter the following error. net ens4: Unexpected TXQ (0) queue failure: -28 This patch adds a check whether sq is full in XDP Xmit. Thanks. v1: 1. rename to check_sq_full_and_disable 2. reorder some funcs to avoid declaration Xuan Zhuo (3):

Hi folks, I've noted that the CentOS 8 debuginfo repo lacks the repodata/ directory: http://debuginfo.centos.org/8/x86_64/ Did the maintainers forget to upload it? It does have all the .rpm files under the Packages/ sub-directory though: http://debuginfo.centos.org/8/x86_64/Packages/ And no repodata/ there either. Also, I've noted the 8-stream/ directory which is empty. Is it