Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "opennsl".
2017 Feb 07
3
GCC 4.9 in CentOS 7 ??
On 02/07/2017 01:42 AM, Alice Wonder wrote:
> The software collections looks like it might interfere with some of my
> own packaging (repos that build upon EPEL to provide modern server
> stack based on LibreSSL and a repo for modern multimedia)
Where do you see a conflict? Those packages are structured to avoid
conflict with the base platform, but installing into an alternate root
2017 Feb 09
3
GCC 4.9 in CentOS 7 ??
--On Tuesday, February 07, 2017 2:33 PM -0800 Alice Wonder
<alice at domblogger.net> wrote:
> What I mean is this - my LibreSSL package installs in /usr and not in
> /opt and that is intentional, so that it is not possible to have both
> opennsl-devel and libressl-devel installed at the same time, since they
> both are the same API.
That's the very problem that Software Collections endeavors to solve. If
you install a non-standard package that conflicts with OS defaults, install
it as a collection so that end users can choose whe...
2009 Oct 20
6
Rails & OpenSSL: `require_frameworks': no such file to load
I have Ruby 1.8.7, Gems 1.3.5, Rails 2.3.4, OpenSSL 0.9.8k installed on
a Solaris machine.
I have tried using the extconf.rb in ruby/ext/opennsl, but I get this:
checking for openssl/ssl.h... no
Any help would be appreciated.
--------------------
# ruby script/server
=> Booting WEBrick
=> Rails 2.3.4 application starting on http://0.0.0.0:3000
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.4/lib/initializer.rb:271:in
`require_framework...
2015 Aug 17
0
LibreSSL on CentOS 7
...figuration
file related - it is hard to tell because the openssl.1 man page is
extremely sparse.
But the LibreSSL equivalent is packages as /usr/bin/libressl - so
installing it won't break any shell scripts that expect certain behavior
because they will continue to use the OpenSSL /usr/bin/opennsl.
For example the -rand switch used in the CentOS packaaged mod_ssl post
scriptlet doesn't work with LibreSSL binary.
Anyway I thought some people on the list might be interested, so far it
is working well for me but I would be very cautious about critical
production use.
2017 Feb 07
0
GCC 4.9 in CentOS 7 ??
...ion. That is, they're available when
> wanted but don't affect the system when they aren't.
>
What I mean is conflicts in devel packages.
What I mean is this - my LibreSSL package installs in /usr and not in
/opt and that is intentional, so that it is not possible to have both
opennsl-devel and libressl-devel installed at the same time, since they
both are the same API.
Here's why -
If I build php against LibreSSL but some some of the PHP build
dependencies are built against OpenSSL then those build dependencies
will want openssl-devel.
If both openssl-devel and libres...
2017 Feb 09
0
GCC 4.9 in CentOS 7 ??
...nneth Porter wrote:
> --On Tuesday, February 07, 2017 2:33 PM -0800 Alice Wonder
> <alice at domblogger.net> wrote:
>
>> What I mean is this - my LibreSSL package installs in /usr and not in
>> /opt and that is intentional, so that it is not possible to have both
>> opennsl-devel and libressl-devel installed at the same time, since they
>> both are the same API.
>
> That's the very problem that Software Collections endeavors to solve. If
> you install a non-standard package that conflicts with OS defaults,
> install it as a collection so that end...