Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "openmode".
Did you mean:
open_mode
2001 Feb 27
2
Network Named Pipes supported under Wine ?
I have a small server process which normall runs on Windows and accepts
network connections via Named Pipes. I would like to run this process
under Wine to avoid having to install an NT server
I get ..
fixme:win32:CreateNamedPipeA (Name="\\\\.\\PIPE\\SOESRV33",
OpenMode=0x000003, dwPipeMode=0x000004, MaxInst=5, OutBSize=10096,
InBuffSize=10096, DefTimeOut=0, SecAttr=0x412f6f00): stub
fixme:win32:CreateNamedPipeA (Name="\\\\.\\PIPE\\SOESRV33",
OpenMode=0x000003, dwPipeMode=0x000004, MaxInst=5, OutBSize=10096,
InBuffSize=10096, DefTimeOut=0, SecAttr=0x4...
2025 May 20
2
can function sftp_upload return OK even if an error message is received?
...rfectly obvious that it can't.
diff --git a/sftp-client.c b/sftp-client.c
index f80352f..964fb3b 100644
--- a/sftp-client.c
+++ b/sftp-client.c
@@ -2010,7 +2010,7 @@ sftp_upload(struct sftp_conn *conn, const char *local_path,
int fsync_flag, int inplace_flag)
{
int r, local_fd;
- u_int openmode, id, status = SSH2_FX_OK, reordered = 0;
+ u_int openmode, id, status = SSH2_FX_OK, failed = 0, reordered = 0;
off_t offset, progress_counter;
u_char type, *handle, *data;
struct sshbuf *msg;
@@ -2150,6 +2150,8 @@ sftp_upload(struct sftp_conn *conn, const char *local_path,
if ((r = sshbuf...
2025 May 13
1
can function sftp_upload return OK even if an error message is received?
Hi,
With reference to the latest version of the portable OpenSSH, in file sftp-client.c, it looks to me there may be a bug in function sftp_upload.
My understanding is that, when variable "len" is equal to 0, no more SSH_FXP_WRITE messages are sent out and you start draining the queue of pending responses. Variable "len" is set to 0 either when the upload is interrupted, or
2012 Jun 19
0
passing data
Hello.
I need some help with this:
I have a link to open a modal window:
<%= link_to instruct.instruction.name, "#myModal", :data => {:toggle =>
"modal", :id => instruct.id}, :class=> "openModal"%>
and a coffeescript
$(".modal-body #result").html $(this).data("id")
Shows me the result in the html: <span
2007 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] PATCH (rest of code changes) "bytecode" --> "bitcode"
Here is the bulk of the sanitizing.
My residual doubts center around the question
whether we still do/want to support (un)compressed *byte*code
in 2.0/2.1.
I need a definitive word on this to proceed.
My understanding is that bytecode is already gone, but there are
still some functions/enums that really deal with *byte*code
(instead of *bit*code).
I did not touch those areas, so the attached