search for: openjdk6

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "openjdk6".

Did you mean: openjdk
2009 Dec 04
2
openjdk6 browser plugin
Hi list, I've installed openjdk6 from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-8-stable/java. Does this package contain a browser java plugin? I can't find it. Any tips are appreciated. Regards, Serguey.
2010 May 16
1
rsync over ssh - existing files are not updated?
...ot 102 May 16 10:41 locale.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 13 Sep 20 2009 local.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 22 May 7 03:33 mercurial.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 50 Jun 13 2009 mozilla-common.csh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 50 Jun 13 2009 mozilla-common.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 299 Sep 10 2009 openjdk6.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 132 Apr 2 23:56 openoffice.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 118 Oct 3 2009 perlbin.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 131 Feb 27 00:51 qt3.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2142 Apr 9 18:26 udisks-bash-completion.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 392 Jan 31 12:19 xorg.sh server after first...
2012 Jul 11
2
So, just wondering, is OpenJDK7 in CentOS 6.3??
http://www.redhat.com/about/news/archive/2012/6/red-hat-enterprise-linux-63-globally-available "Developer Tools: In addition to OpenJDK6 support in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, the newly introduced OpenJDK7 allows customers running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.3 to develop and test with the latest version of open source Java. " Yet in the CentOS 6.3 release notes, the only mention about "OpenJDK" is for OpenJDK 6... ht...
2013 Jun 08
1
Multicast panic caused by elasticsearch
Hi, I was experimenting with Logstash + elasticsearch on FreeBSD 9 - initially I downloaded it by hand (I forgot to check for a port) and it worked fine. I then tried the port and this forced me to use a different java version (was jdk-16.0.3p4_25 now openjdk6-b27) and it seems that the new one causes a panic. Unfortunately crashdumps aren't working properly, however I did get the panic message.. in6p_lookup_mcast_ifp: not multicast This is from /usr/src/sys/netinet6/in6_mcast.c around line 1775. Has anyone else seen such a problem? Some quick goo...
2014 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] VMKit is retired (but you can help if you want!)
Oups, sorry for the mistake, llcj (not llc:)) is not more maintained! Gaël Le 10 sept. 2014 00:27, "Gaël Thomas" <gael.thomas00 at gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi Brian, > > So, I confirm, llc is not more maintained. And using vmjc is probably > the good starting point to translate Java bytecode into llvm bitcode. > > However, I think that your hack (changing the way