search for: opendkim

Following the most recent kernel updates I restarted our outgoing SMTP MTA which was recently reconfigured to DKIM sign messages using OpenDKIM. This morning I discovered that Postfix had stopped on that server. Whether it is related to the Postfix issue or not is yet to be determined but, in the process of getting things restarted I ran across this error with Open DKIM: # service opendkim restart Stopping OpenDKIM Milter:...

CentOS-6.5 OpenDKIM-2.9.0 (epel) Postfix-2.6.6 (updates) I am trying to get opendkim working with our mailing lists. In the course of that endeavour I note that these messages are appearing in our syslog: May 4 20:50:02 inet08 setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/opendkim from using the signull access...

...ut have you checked to see if you now have a > "rpmsave" file left after installing the update? If so, that's your > old configuration and you might need to re-write the new configuration > file to incorporate your previous customization. > Yes that was the problem. The OpenDKIM maintainers deprecated a configuration option (SenderHeaders) that we were using so the opendkim service would not restart. So there was nothing listening at port 8891. Removing the optin fixed the problem. I can find no discussion of why this option was removed and the OpenDKIM readme (http://ww...

Dear Friends, is anyone is able to setup DKIM with FreeBSD 9.0 and Postfix? thanks / Prabhpal

What are you trying to accomplish? On 7/5/2020 12:27 PM, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > This is OpenBSD with OpenSSL. There are no patches for dovecot version > 2.3.10.1: > https://github.com/openbsd/ports/tree/master/mail/dovecot/patches > <https://github.com/openbsd/ports/tree/master/mail/dovecot/patches> > > My latest run is attached. > > > make check > ...

There was an update to opendkim 2.10.1 which I applied and now I am seeing this: warning: connect to Milter service inet:127.0.0.1:8891: Connection refused I tried to yum history rollback to 2.9.1 but that package has disappeared so I am evidently constrained to resolve this. Does anyone have any idea what has happened and wh...

On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:11:38 -0400 James B. Byrne wrote: > Does anyone have any idea what has happened and why I might be getting > that message? I don't use that but have you checked to see if you now have a "rpmsave" file left after installing the update? If so, that's your old configuration and you might need to re-write the new configuration file to incorporate your

I am running CentOS 7 as an outbound gateway using Postfix, OpenDKIM, and SASLAuthd.? The trouble is Postfix fails if OpenDKIM and SASLAuthd aren?t already running and I have to manually restart these services in order.? My question is, should I modify my After line in the ?[Unit]? section of my postfix.service file to read ?After=syslog.target network.target opendk...

Andr?, are you quite sure you have it working? In this thread someone from Open-Xchange stated that no, Dovecot doesn?t have SMTPUTF8 support implemented, and the same response was given by another Dovecot developer last September (it ?is being considered? was the answer then, see https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2018-September/112887.html). I am using LMTP to deliver mail to Dovecot from

...;UNKNOWN> > Apr 5 10:16:39 portal postfix/smtpd[2566]: EB38240467: client=mail-lf1-f51.google.com[209.85.167.51] > Apr 5 10:16:40 portal postfix/cleanup[2576]: EB38240467: message-id=<CAKr9_Nv1pgDAC31cFF4YPE-mnYxSusmKsWHOCxWPSeJ2Adj8cQ at mail.gmail.com> > Apr 5 10:16:40 portal opendkim[15477]: EB38240467: mail-lf1-f51.google.com [209.85.167.51] not internal > Apr 5 10:16:40 portal opendkim[15477]: EB38240467: not authenticated > Apr 5 10:16:40 portal opendkim[15477]: EB38240467: DKIM verification successful > Apr 5 10:16:40 portal opendkim[15477]: EB38240467: s=201610...

Both Dovecot and OpenDKIM packages on OpenBSD are rejecting connections because of CRYPTO, and they use libressl by default. I use openssl because libressl does not implement dane, so I am recompiling both to serve my use case, and sharing results along the way. This is the opendkim error: > opendkim: ... SSL error:04F...

..., a vm in format qcow2 on host A (Intel Xeon CPU E5-1650 v4) do not start on host B ( Intel Core i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz ) i get on host B by starting the vm "trap errors" Opcode. anyone here has an idea how to solve this? kind regards marko -- zbfmail - Mittendrin statt nur Datei! OpenDKIM, SPF, DSPAM, Greylisting, POSTSCREEN, AMAVIS, Mailgateways Mailfiltering, SMTP Service, Spam Abwehr, MX-Backup, Mailserver Backup Redundante Mailgateways, HA Mailserver, Secure Mailserver

On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote: > fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by letting opendkim and opendmarc not reject detected maillist will be solution, A general broad mailing list whitelist will be problematic, do work it needs to look for specific list type hidden headers, spammers and nasties will incorporate those headers into their trash that impersonates mailing lists and voila,...

...;UNKNOWN> > Apr 5 10:16:39 portal postfix/smtpd[2566]: EB38240467: client=mail-lf1-f51.google.com[209.85.167.51] > Apr 5 10:16:40 portal postfix/cleanup[2576]: EB38240467: message-id=<CAKr9_Nv1pgDAC31cFF4YPE-mnYxSusmKsWHOCxWPSeJ2Adj8cQ at mail.gmail.com> > Apr 5 10:16:40 portal opendkim[15477]: EB38240467: mail-lf1-f51.google.com [209.85.167.51] not internal > Apr 5 10:16:40 portal opendkim[15477]: EB38240467: not authenticated > Apr 5 10:16:40 portal opendkim[15477]: EB38240467: DKIM verification successful > Apr 5 10:16:40 portal opendkim[15477]: EB38240467: s=201610...

Hi, -- This message refers to the maillist itself rather than to dovecot software -- I have noticed that when I post to this list (only), I get DKIM Verification failure reports from: root at moncton.sidefx.com (e.g. for my last post: "DKIM failure report for job 4D27B5DC4E on mail.sidefx.com") root at mail.rmacd.com (e.g. for my last post: "DKIM failure report for job

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > How would you implement the section here titled "Sendmail > workaround" using Postfix? http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter -- Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>

...Now my question is, is it possible to execute commands on the windows server via qemu-agent? I want to shutdown the MSSQL Service before doing backups. Is that possible? i dont find any helpful pages in net. Any hints & tipps are welcome Marko -- zbfmail - Mittendrin statt nur Datei! OpenDKIM, SPF, DSPAM, Greylisting, POSTSCREEN, AMAVIS, Mailgateways Mailfiltering, SMTP Service, Spam Abwehr, MX-Backup, Mailserver Backup Redundante Mailgateways, HA Mailserver, Secure Mailserver

Am 09.02.19 um 19:56 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot: > I'll review the settings when we manage to upgrade to mailman3 Hello Aki, before updating to mailman3 consider an simpler update to latest mailman2. you're using 2.1.15, current mailman2 is 2.1.29 Your missing an /significant amount/ of DMARC fixes! and: more off-topic: while my messages *to* the dovecot list are sent using

...n denied (euid=387(vmail) egid=387(vmail) missing +x perm: /var/lib/dovecot, we're not in group 97(dovecot), dir owned by 97:97 mode=0750) In this case, the user vmail is a member of the dovecot group: [root at gatekeeper dovecot]# cat /etc/group | grep vmail mail:x:12:postfix,vmail,opendmarc,opendkim,openarc dovecot:x:97:vmail vmail:x:387: [root at gatekeeper dovecot]# sudo su - vmail Last login: Wed Oct 14 16:15:48 SAST 2020 on pts/0 [vmail at gatekeeper ~]$ wc -c /var/lib/dovecot/sieve/vacation.svbin 530 /var/lib/dovecot/sieve/vacation.svbin Does dovecot-lda do anything odd with respect to...

On 2/10/19 3:46 PM, Michael A. Peters via dovecot wrote: > On 2/10/19 3:42 PM, Noel Butler via dovecot wrote: >> On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote: >> >>> >>> fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by letting opendkim and >>> opendmarc not reject detected maillist will be solution, >> >> >> A general broad mailing list whitelist will be problematic, do work it >> needs to look for specific list type hidden headers,? spammers and >> nasties will incorporate those headers...