Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "opencxx".
Did you mean:
opencl
2004 Apr 07
0
[LLVMdev] Re: [Opencxx-users] LLVM and OpenC++
...ux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Opencxx-users mailing list
> Opencxx-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opencxx-users
>
>
##################################################################
# Grzegorz Jakacki Huada Electronic Design #
# Senior Engineer, CAD Dept...
2004 Apr 10
0
[LLVMdev] Re: [Opencxx-users] LLVM and OpenC++
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 03:35:36AM +0400, "Valery A.Khamenya" wrote:
> Hi Grzegorz,
>
> > Hard to say. What is "second breath"? Are you proposing a solution that
> > integrates OpenC++ with LLVM? Please elaborate.
>
> let's separate "what" and "how".
>
> I do not speak abot "how" right now, because it is rather
2004 Apr 09
2
[LLVMdev] Re: [Opencxx-users] LLVM and OpenC++
Hi Grzegorz,
> Hard to say. What is "second breath"? Are you proposing a solution that
> integrates OpenC++ with LLVM? Please elaborate.
let's separate "what" and "how".
I do not speak abot "how" right now, because it is rather
a second step (if any).
I do believe that reflections without interpreter or JITing
can't be any powerfull.
2004 Apr 07
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM and OpenC++
Hi OpenC++ developers,
IMHO, the LLVM project (http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/) could give
a second breath to OpenC++ project. Indeed, the implementations
of reflection become quite restricted if the just-in-time (JIT)
compiling is not available.
Am i wrong?
---
Valery A.Khamenya