search for: openbenchmarking

...l boot Xorg at http://pastebin.com/reZdAXEF GLX Renderer is detected as GLX "Mesa DRI nv18 x86/MMX+/3DNow!+/SSE GLX" Same configuration with nomodeset Xorg log at http://pastebin.com/ZbXBG8sz GLX Renderer: Gallium 0.4 on softpipe Results for Cairo test with and without nomodeset http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1306082-CGAR-CAIROTE23 Full results from Friday (before update Mesa) http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1306072-UT-2DGPUTEST95 The result with Cairo are better in the updated system, 0.63 FPS vs 0.54 FPS but still worse than boot with nomodeset (7,84 FPS) Any ideas to improve the res...

...0x600 because was impossible for me set up 1024x768 There is the full xorg log http://pastebin.com/2ZbMwyRK The results are strange for me. I expect better performance on "optimized" configuration but some test using Cairo are very bad (0,54 vs 5,38). The test are available at http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1306076-UT-2DGPUTEST63 Any idea to improve the performace of NV18? Any know issue with nouveau_vieux_dri.so and NV18?

...nchmarks of LLVM recently, and overall they look pretty good. Aside from things that use OpenMP or benefit from autovectorisation, Clang/LLVM and GCC seem to come fairly close, with no overall winner. But: there do seem to have been a number of performance regressions between 2.9 and 3.0: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1110178-AR-1110173AR66 Identifying where these were introduced is quite difficult. I wonder if some of the buildbots could be persuaded, after building clang, to build and run some benchmark projects (e.g. perlbench, povray, flac / lame, whatever) and email people if they introduce a p...

...ll they look pretty good. Aside from things that use OpenMP or benefit from autovectorisation, Clang/LLVM and GCC seem to come fairly close, with no overall winner. Nice. Thanks. > > But: there do seem to have been a number of performance regressions between 2.9 and 3.0: > > http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1110178-AR-1110173AR66 > > Identifying where these were introduced is quite difficult. I wonder if some of the buildbots could be persuaded, after building clang, to build and run some benchmark projects (e.g. perlbench, povray, flac / lame, whatever) and email people if they int...

Hi All, Could anyone point me to some good benchmarking tools to measure the runtime performance of clang compiled C++ applications. Thanks ! - Jyoti -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131003/3cc029f1/attachment.html>

...4x768 > > There is the full xorg log > http://pastebin.com/2ZbMwyRK > > The results are strange for me. I expect better performance on > "optimized" configuration but some test using Cairo are very bad (0,54 > vs 5,38). > > The test are available at > http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1306076-UT-2DGPUTEST63 > > Any idea to improve the performace of NV18? > Any know issue with nouveau_vieux_dri.so and NV18? It's a little difficult to tell anything without seeing your xorg.conf -- it seems like 1024x768 should work fine. You also appear to be in 16-bit mod...

...hat use OpenMP or benefit from > autovectorisation, Clang/LLVM and GCC seem to come fairly close, with no > overall winner. > > Nice. Thanks. > > > > > But: there do seem to have been a number of performance regressions > between 2.9 and 3.0: > > > > http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1110178-AR-1110173AR66 > > > > Identifying where these were introduced is quite difficult. I wonder if > some of the buildbots could be persuaded, after building clang, to build > and run some benchmark projects (e.g. perlbench, povray, flac / lame, > whatever) and...

.... >> >> 1. Phoronix have done some performance test using its Phoronix Test >> Benchmarks (http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/ ), it includes plenty of >> commonly used applications. The full list of applications in Phoronix >> benchmark could be found here: http://openbenchmarking.org/suites/pts >> > Hi LK > > -1 :P Have you looked at their testsuite and how it's setup? It gives > little regard for switching out and tracking the performance of compiler > flag changes. > > >> 2. For industry standard performance comparison, SPEC CPU is...

What are the recommendations for running KVM images on BTRFS systems using kernel 3.4?  I saw older posts on the web complaining about poor performance, but I know a lot of work has gone into btrfs since then.  There also seemed to be the nocow option, but I didn''t find anything that said it actualy helped. Anybody have ideas? Thanks, Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line