search for: open_was_def

...oplock. * The second open on the same file needs to call defer_open() and send oplock break msg to itself. * Most of time, the msg can be received. Performance is OK. But sometimes for some reason, the msg couldn't be received. I don't know why. So there was a delay(probably 60s) after open_was_deferred(). After this, Windows client tried to send SMBntcreate to open it again. This time still failed. Since we have "Trying to delay for oplocks twice" in open_file_ntcreate(), it leaded to close the connection. - Whether IS the defer_open on the second open necessary? Because this is t...

...NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status) && (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status,NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) || @@ -1888,8 +1888,14 @@ status = rename_internals(conn, fsp->fsp_name, new_name, 0, replace_if_exists, path_contains_wcard); - if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) + + if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { + if (open_was_deferred(SVAL(inbuf,smb_mid))) { + /* We have re-scheduled this call. */ + return -1; + } return ERROR_NT(status); + } /* * Rename was successful. diff -urN samba-3.0.23d/source/smbd/reply.c samba/source/smbd/reply.c --- samba-3.0.23d/source/smbd/reply.c 2006-06-23 08:16:49.000000000 -05...

...NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status) && (NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status,NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) || @@ -1888,8 +1888,14 @@ status = rename_internals(conn, fsp->fsp_name, new_name, 0, replace_if_exists, path_contains_wcard); - if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) + + if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) { + if (open_was_deferred(SVAL(inbuf,smb_mid))) { + /* We have re-scheduled this call. */ + return -1; + } return ERROR_NT(status); + } /* * Rename was successful. diff -urN samba-3.0.23d/source/smbd/reply.c samba/source/smbd/reply.c --- samba-3.0.23d/source/smbd/reply.c 2006-06-23 08:16:49.000000000 -05...