search for: open_file_shared1

...same (about 500), but then start quick increased and stop on slightly more than value "max open files" from "smb.conf" - when I set debugging in smb.conf, in station log is suspicious record about closing file with filedescriptor fd=-1 : [2002/06/07 14:33:53, 4] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(891) calling open_file with flags=0x0 flags2=0x0 mode=0764 [2002/06/07 14:33:53, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(230) johny opened file O/a1/KO-I_X8-eh.dft read=Yes write=No (numopen=1) reply_ntcreate_and_X: fnum = 5004, open name = O/a1/KO-I_X8-eh.dft switch message SMBclose (pid 6617) pip...

...rt(319) New file projects.INF [2004/10/15 10:24:52, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(Zwischenablage/Jaeger/pipe/projects.INF) returning 0777 [2004/10/15 10:24:52, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(123) allocated file structure 9547, fnum = 13643 (3 used) [2004/10/15 10:24:52, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(808) open_file_shared: fname = Zwischenablage/Jaeger/pipe/projects.INF, share_mode = 40, ofun = 1, mode = 777, oplock request = 0 [2004/10/15 10:24:52, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1145) is_in_path: Zwischenablage/Jaeger/pipe/projects.INF [2004/10/15 10:24:52, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1150) is_in...

Good day folks, I'm using Samba 2.2.8a [1] on Slackware 9.1 with 2000/XP clients. I'm attempting to have a process by which a user drags a file using Windows Explorer into a share. On the server side, I have a unix process that polls the directory for new files and then reads them and deletes them. I'm having a problem where I can gain the lock but the process is still writing to

...his 2 errors I found in the level 10 log when I try to copy a fresh copied file a second time on itself (permissions of test file are -r-xrw----, user and group match) Maybe the attribute mapping goes another path with acl support? 3.0.7 works fine. Daniel [2004/11/09 17:02:02, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(1038) open_file_shared: fname = bootfont.bin, dos_attrs = 27, share_mode = 41, ofun = 12, mode = 560, oplock request = 3 [2004/11/09 17:02:02, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode(283) dos_mode: bootfont.bin [2004/11/09 17:02:02, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode_from_sbuf(151) dos_mode_from_sbuf returning ra...

...x_mode(67) unix_mode(STS107/DEBUG10) inherit mode 40770 [2003/02/11 10:19:47, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(STS107/DEBUG10) returning 0760 [2003/02/11 10:19:47, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(123) allocated file structure 4662, fnum = 8758 (1 used) [2003/02/11 10:19:47, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(782) open_file_shared: fname = STS107/DEBUG10, share_mode = 42, ofun = 12, mode = 760, oplock request = 0 [2003/02/11 10:19:47, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1145) is_in_path: STS107/DEBUG10 [2003/02/11 10:19:47, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1150) is_in_path: no name list. [2003/02/11 10:19:47, 3] lib...

...witch_message(685) switch message SMBopen (pid 30604) [2004/08/21 18:07:00, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 1001) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/08/21 18:07:00, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(grupos.conf) returning 0775 [2004/08/21 18:07:00, 4] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(1010) calling open_file with flags=0x2 flags2=0x0 mode=0775 [2004/08/21 18:07:00, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(240) marcus opened file grupos.conf read=Yes write=Yes (numopen=1) [2004/08/21 18:07:00, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(890) Transaction 14 of length 63 [2004/08/21 18:07:00, 3] smbd/p...

Prior to upgrading from RH7.0 to RH7.3 our Samba filserver worked perfectly. Now we are having locking problems. Initially Iused the same samba binaries built on RH70, I tried rebuilding Samba and reinstalling but it had no effect. If user bon opens an M$-Office file they frequently get a 'file is already in use by bob'. Sure enough smbstatus -L shows the file locked by bob, but bob

...onversion finished "" -> . [2004/11/26 00:19:18, 3] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(834) reduce_name [.] [/usr/local/samba/exports/dfsroot] ...... [2004/11/26 00:19:18, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(122) allocated file structure 3158, fnum = 7254 (2 used) [2004/11/26 00:19:18, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(1038) open_file_shared: fname = ., dos_attrs = 0, share_mode = 40, ofun = 1, mode = 644, oplock request = 3 [2004/11/26 00:19:18, 3] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(834) reduce_name [.] [/usr/local/samba/exports/dfsroot] [2004/11/26 00:19:18, 10] smbd/vfs.c:reduce_name(902) reduce_name realpath [....

...5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(319) New file ~test~bk.tst [2003/12/15 15:34:21, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(~test~bk.tst) returning 0660 [2003/12/15 15:34:21, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(123) allocated file structure 284, fnum = 4380 (1 used) [2003/12/15 15:34:21, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(807) open_file_shared: fname = ~test~bk.tst, share_mode = 40, ofun = 12, mode = 660, oplock request = 3 [2003/12/15 15:34:21, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1145) is_in_path: ~test~bk.tst [2003/12/15 15:34:21, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1150) is_in_path: no name list. [2003/12/15 15:34:21, 3] lib/uti...

...ies: "The file Book1.xls already exists. Do you want to replace the existing file?". 5. Click "yes" and it works. So, in #3 above, it should have worked, but it didn't. No idea why. I ran a log level 10 on this and found these entries: [2003/10/20 15:51:16, 5] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(877) open_file_shared: create new requested for file test/Book1.xls and file already exists. [2003/10/20 15:51:16, 5] smbd/files.c:file_free(385) freed files structure 9281 (1 used) [2003/10/20 15:51:16, 10] smbd/trans2.c:set_bad_path_error(1785) set_bad_path_error: err = 17 bad_path = 0 [200...

...5] smbd/filename.c:unix_convert(319) New file ~test~bk.tst [2003/12/15 15:34:21, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(~test~bk.tst) returning 0660 [2003/12/15 15:34:21, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(123) allocated file structure 284, fnum = 4380 (1 used) [2003/12/15 15:34:21, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(807) open_file_shared: fname = ~test~bk.tst, share_mode = 40, ofun = 12, mode = 660, oplock request = 3 [2003/12/15 15:34:21, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1145) is_in_path: ~test~bk.tst [2003/12/15 15:34:21, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1150) is_in_path: no name list. [2003/12/15 15:34:21, 3] lib/uti...

...]: #2 smbd [0x81c5858] Sep 8 14:15:51 localhost smbd[2598]: #3 [0x1a7420] Sep 8 14:15:51 localhost smbd[2598]: #4 smbd(get_acl_group_bits+0x31) [0x80d0151] Sep 8 14:15:51 localhost smbd[2598]: #5 smbd(file_set_dosmode+0x41) [0x80bdfe1] Sep 8 14:15:51 localhost smbd[2598]: #6 smbd(open_file_shared1+0x6c1) [0x80c16b1] Sep 8 14:15:51 localhost smbd[2598]: #7 smbd(reply_ntcreate_and_X+0xb5a) [0x80990ea] Sep 8 14:15:51 localhost smbd[2598]: #8 smbd [0x80d1db6] Sep 8 14:15:51 localhost smbd[2598]: #9 smbd [0x80d2040] Sep 8 14:15:51 localhost smbd[2598]: #10 smbd(process_smb+0x8c) [...

...up succeeded for name [NTCONFIG.POL] -> [ntconfig.pol] [2005/09/12 16:11:40, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(ntconfig.pol) returning 0744 [2005/09/12 16:11:40, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(129) allocated file structure 9502, fnum = 13598 (1 used) [2005/09/12 16:11:40, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(1047) open_file_shared: fname = ntconfig.pol, dos_attrs = 0, share_mode = 20, ofun = 1, mode = 744, oplock request = 3 [2005/09/12 16:11:40, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode(283) dos_mode: ntconfig.pol [2005/09/12 16:11:40, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode_from_sbuf(151) dos_mode_from_sbuf returning a [...

...ib/util.c:smb_panic2(1503) BACKTRACE: 14 stack frames: #0 smbd(smb_panic2+0x78) [0x81db3ff] #1 smbd(smb_panic+0x19) [0x81db600] #2 smbd [0x81c9594] #3 /lib/tls/libc.so.6 [0x635a48] #4 smbd(get_acl_group_bits+0x37) [0x80d13b0] #5 smbd(file_set_dosmode+0x4f) [0x80bf3d5] #6 smbd(open_file_shared1+0x7a3) [0x80c2a4a] #7 smbd(reply_ntcreate_and_X+0x7ee) [0x8098c1c] #8 smbd [0x80d4e0d] #9 smbd(process_smb+0x163) [0x80d51ca] #10 smbd(smbd_process+0x13e) [0x80d5e2b] #11 smbd(main+0x822) [0x8251bd5] #12 /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe3) [0x622e33] #13 smbd [0x8079941]...

...; drivers -> add and tries to add the above mentioned driver. Some files are then being copied to the samba server, but then copying stops with a message "Access Denied". The (reproducible) problem is a file which is tried to be copied to W32X86/: [2005/09/07 13:12:28, 5] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(1148) open_file_shared: read/write access requested for file W32X86/SET12.tmp on read only file [2005/09/07 13:12:28, 5] smbd/files.c:file_free(439) freed files structure 9190 (0 used) [2005/09/07 13:12:28, 10] smbd/trans2.c:set_bad_path_error(2191) set_bad_path_error: err = 13 bad_path = 0 [...

...************************ is_in_path: dwg/TANGO/950124/950124PX.INI [2003/06/04 16:36:17, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1179) is_in_path: match not found [2003/06/04 16:36:17, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(387) unix_clean_name [dwg/TANGO/950124/950124PX.INI] [2003/06/04 16:36:17, 4] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(942) calling open_file with flags=0x1 flags2=0x0 mode=0764 [2003/06/04 16:36:17, 10] smbd/open.c:fd_open(53) fd_open: name dwg/TANGO/950124/950124PX.INI, flags = 01 mode = 0764, fd = -1. No such file or directory [2003/06/04 16:36:17, 3] smbd/open.c:open_file(176) Error opening file dwg/T...

Hi All, I was checking the access rights and a problem (hence a question) appeared: Who can delete a file through Samba ? Suppose we have the following situation: drwxrwxrwx john finance directory -rw-r--r-- jack finance directory/file Under unix everyone can delete the file. Under Samba, the documentation says (due to the Windows sementic) you also need the write access to the

...plock_break: no fsp found for our own oplock [2005/03/04 12:25:05, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1490) BACKTRACE: 14 stack frames: #0 smbd(smb_panic2+0x1b6) [0x81cdf1a] #1 smbd(smb_panic+0x19) [0x81cdd62] #2 smbd(request_oplock_break+0x1d5) [0x81fca07] #3 smbd [0x80bf613] #4 smbd(open_file_shared1+0x801) [0x80c08ce] #5 smbd(open_file_shared+0x51) [0x80c00cb] #6 smbd(reply_open_and_X+0x2bc) [0x80a14c4] #7 smbd [0x80d04c4] #8 smbd [0x80d0574] #9 smbd(process_smb+0x1eb) [0x80d08b9] #10 smbd(smbd_process+0x170) [0x80d149c] #11 smbd(main+0x7d4) [0x8240f8c] #12 /lib...

...unix_convert(188) conversion finished 800000B0 -> 800000B0 [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(800000B0) returning 0744 [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(123) allocated file structure 1482, fnum = 5578 (1 used) [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(782) open_file_shared: fname = 800000B0, share_mode = 11, ofun = 12, mode = 744, oplock request = 0 [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1145) is_in_path: 800000B0 [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1150) is_in_path: no name list. [2003/11/20 22:57:34, 3] lib/util.c:unix...

...004/01/09 10:05:49, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1477) is_in_path: no name list. [2004/01/09 10:05:49, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode(168) dos_mode returning a [2004/01/09 10:05:49, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(122) allocated file structure 2384, fnum = 6480 (1 used) [2004/01/09 10:05:49, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(848) open_file_shared: fname = VIDEO/2003-1/DVm04-01.avi, share_mode = 10, ofun = 1, mode = 0, oplock request = 0 [2004/01/09 10:05:49, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1473) is_in_path: VIDEO/2003-1/DVm04-01.avi [2004/01/09 10:05:49, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1477) is_in_path: no name list. [2004/01/...