Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "open_ctree_fd".
2010 Dec 01
12
Fsck, parent transid verify failed
Hi folks!
Been using btrfs for quite a while now, worked great until now.
Got power-loss on my machine and now i have the "parent transid verify
failed on X wanted X found X" problem.
So I can''t get it to mount.
My btrfs is spread over sda (2tb), sdc(2tb), sdd(1tb).
Is this something that an offline fsck could fix ?
If so is the fsck-util being developed ?
Is there a way to
2009 Nov 14
2
[PATCH] btrfs-progs: Check mount status of multidevice filesystems
...const char *filename, u64 sb_bytenr, int writes, int check_mount)
{
int fp;
struct btrfs_root *root;
@@ -584,14 +584,14 @@ struct btrfs_root *open_ctree(const char *filename, u64 sb_bytenr, int writes)
fprintf (stderr, "Could not open %s\n", filename);
return NULL;
}
- root = open_ctree_fd(fp, filename, sb_bytenr, writes);
+ root = open_ctree_fd(fp, filename, sb_bytenr, writes, check_mount);
close(fp);
return root;
}
struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path, u64 sb_bytenr,
- int writes)
+ int writes, int check_mount)
{
u32 sectorsize;
u32 nodes...
2011 May 30
5
Damaged super block / fs root
I have accidently damaged the first block(s) of a btrfs partition
and can''t mount it anymore.
I can see that my data is still intact by running a command like:
cat /dev/sda5 | hexdump -C | more
Do any (experimental) tools exist which would allow me to recover the files?
Thank you
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a
2011 Aug 14
1
btrfs: failed to read chunk root
...0 131072
[ 752.129152] btrfs: failed to read chunk root on sda5
[ 752.132190] btrfs: open_ctree failed
[ 1132.984600] device label deux devid 1 transid 86 /dev/sdb3
[ 1171.796682] device fsid 9d42de57e2bebde7-4824b05acb3c538d devid 1
transid 346 /dev/sda5
Trying btrfsck:
btrfsck: disk-io.c:721: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!chunk_root->node)'' failed.
It had worked alright during the last couple of reboots. Before
rebooting I created a new btrfs volume which I am able to mount
without problems in rescue mode.
Thanks for any help,
Espen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u...
2011 May 20
1
btrfsck: couldn't open because of unsupported option features (8)
...ound 337853
Failed to read block groups: -5
btrfs: open_ctree failed
Tried to mount without space_cache give the same message.
Trying to run btrfsck (or btrfs-debug-tree), compiled from git gives me this:
couldn''t open because of unsupported option features (8).
btrfsck: disk-io.c:683: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(1)'' failed.
Aborted
I see an Ubuntu bug (748340 -
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/btrfs-tools/+bug/748340)
with a similar output (they get an unsupported option features (2)
instead of (8)), but there isn''t any resolution that I see. Is there
anything I...
2011 Apr 07
0
[PATCH] btrfs-progs: cast u64 to long long to avoid printf warnings
...;, block_only);
+ fprintf(stderr, "failed to read %llu\n",
+ (unsigned long long)block_only);
return 0;
}
btrfs_print_tree(root, leaf, 0);
diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
index a6e1000..5295dca 100644
--- a/disk-io.c
+++ b/disk-io.c
@@ -678,7 +678,8 @@ struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path, u64 sb_bytenr,
~BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP;
if (features) {
printk("couldn''t open because of unsupported "
- "option features (%Lx).\n", features);
+ "option features (%Lx).\n",
+ (unsigned long lon...
2010 Jun 05
0
PULL: Properly cast and avoid compiler warnings, fixes build on alpha and ia64.
...(long long unsigned int) block_only);
return 0;
}
btrfs_print_tree(root, leaf, 0);
diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
index addebe1..463c8bc 100644
- --- a/disk-io.c
+++ b/disk-io.c
@@ -678,7 +678,8 @@ struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char
*path, u64 sb_bytenr,
~BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP;
if (features) {
printk("couldn''t open because of unsupported "
- - "option features (%Lx).\n", features);
+ "...
2011 Mar 06
4
Recovering "parent transid verify failed"
...me this error:
using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864
parent transid verify failed on 216925220864 wanted 135714 found 135713
parent transid verify failed on 216925220864 wanted 135714 found 135713
parent transid verify failed on 216925220864 wanted 135714 found 135713
btrfs-select-super: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd: Assertion
`!(!tree_root->node)'' failed.
>> -s 2 gives me this error:
using SB copy 2, bytenr 274877906944
No valid Btrfs found on /dev/sda4
> btrfsck
parent transid verify failed on 216925220864 wanted 135714 found 135713
parent transid verify failed on 216925220864 wanted 13...
2010 Sep 06
0
parent transid verify failed
...ted 375202 found 375201
parent transid verify failed on 53984886784 wanted 375202 found 375201
parent transid verify failed on 53984886784 wanted 375202 found 375201
btrfs: open_ctree failed
btrfsck aborts:
couldn''t open because of unsupported option features (2).
btrfsck: disk-io.c:682: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(1)'' failed.
[1] 14899 abort btrfsck /dev/sdc4
Is there any way to recover the filesystem?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.ker...
2010 Aug 09
0
Re: btrfsck: checksum verify failed
...the output:
>
> bin@dora:~# btrfsck /dev/sdb
> parent transid verify failed on 986800398336 wanted 5352 found 5355
> parent transid verify failed on 986800398336 wanted 5352 found 5355
> parent transid verify failed on 986800398336 wanted 5352 found 5355
> btrfsck: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root->node)''
> failed.
> Aborted
>
>
> I am using v 0.19 of the btrfs-tools, and kernel version 2.6.34.1
>
> While a little sad that I can''t get at my data anymore, I do have backups of
> it. I also want to use the device again, but w...
2008 Jan 07
1
[PATCH]Add rollback support for the converter
...n %s\n", devname);
goto fail;
}
ret = make_btrfs(fd, blocks, total_bytes, blocksize,
blocksize, blocksize, blocksize);
if (ret) {
- fprintf(stderr, "failed to create ctree\n");
+ fprintf(stderr, "unable to create initial ctree\n");
goto fail;
}
root = open_ctree_fd(fd, super_bytenr);
if (!root) {
- fprintf(stderr, "failed to open ctree\n");
- goto fail;
- }
-
+ fprintf(stderr, "unable to open ctree\n");
+ goto fail;
+ }
+ fd = dup(fd);
+ if (fd < 0) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "unable to duplicate file descriptor\n");
+ goto f...
2011 Jun 06
2
Re: New btrfsck status
Chris Mason on 10 Feb 13:17:
> Excerpts from Ben Gamari''s message of 2011-02-09 21:52:20 -0500:
> > Over the last several months there have been many claims regarding
> > the release of the rewritten btrfsck. Unfortunately, despite
> > numerous claims that it will be released Real Soon Now(c), I have
> > yet to see even a repository with preliminary code. Did I
2011 Feb 10
1
Recovering data from disk with loose cable
...en running btrfs (RAID 1 for
both data and metadata). Unfortunately, earlier today it seems one of
the SATA cables came loose, resulting in the kernel (2.6.37)
eventually OOPSing although apparently not before writing quite a bit
of data. Upon reboot, I was met with the dreaded,
disk-io.c:741: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root->node)'' failed.
Unfortunately any attempt to run any of the btrfs-progs utilities
(from git) met a similar end. There was recently a patch to try harder
in recovering from this problem posted to the list[1], although
unfortunately it is unable to find a root. C...
2011 Mar 09
0
Re: "open_ctree failed", unable to mount the fs
...r 9 23:59:52 ftp2 kernel: [121696.665378] sd 7:0:0:0: [sdd] CDB: Write(10): 2a 00 6a 79 f8 4f 00 00 70 00
Mar 9 23:59:52 ftp2 kernel: [121696.665543] end_request: I/O error, dev sdd, sector 1786378319
============================================
ftp2 ~ # btrfsck /dev/sdd1
btrfsck: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root->node)'' failed.
Aborted
============================================
ftp2 ~ # uname -a
Linux ftp2 2.6.37-gentoo-mykernel #2 SMP Fri Jan 28 00:39:02 CET 2011 x86_64 Genuine Intel(R) CPU 2140 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
======================================...