search for: opearting

Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "opearting".

Did you mean: opearing
2019 Mar 14
2
Am I right to assume certificate renewal with the same filename requires a dovecot reload/restart
On 3/14/19 9:55 AM, Patrick Cernko via dovecot wrote: > [...] the way we have configured exim, it neither needs reload or > restart but reads the certificate file every time it has to use it. What happens if you goof off in the middle of an opeartion, temporarily putting a wrong file instead of the new certificate, and exim starts delivering the new broken certificate right away ? or
2019 Mar 14
0
Re: Am I right to assume certificate renewal with the same filename requires a dovecot reload/restart
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, at 12:09 PM, Yassine Chaouche via dovecot wrote: > On 3/14/19 9:55 AM, Patrick Cernko via dovecot wrote: > > > [...] the way we have configured exim, it neither needs reload or > > restart but reads the certificate file every time it has to use it. > > What happens if you goof off in the middle of an opeartion, temporarily > putting a wrong file
2011 Jan 18
1
Loading wordnet in R
I ve installed wordnet 2.1 and R 2.11.0 on windows 7. Whenver i try to load wordnet in R, i get an error initDict() FALSE cannot find wordnet 'dict' directory, Please set the WNHOME variable to its parent. I have tried setting WNHOME to "C:\Program Files (x86)\WordNet\2.1\dict","C:\\Program Files (x86)\\WordNet\\2.1\\dict","C:\\\\Program Files
2019 Mar 14
4
Am I right to assume certificate renewal with the same filename requires a dovecot reload/restart
On 3/14/19 9:32 AM, Yassine Chaouche via dovecot wrote: > The general answere here is try and see, as you could totally test it > on your own. The certificate is read at startup and put in memory for > the rest of the execution time. Dovecot won't monitor the file for > changes on disk, as this would waste CPU cycles and make dovecot only > slower for no reason. The process
2016 Mar 21
0
[PATCH v2 17/18] zsmalloc: migrate tail pages in zspage
This patch enables tail page migration of zspage. In this point, I tested zsmalloc regression with micro-benchmark which does zs_malloc/map/unmap/zs_free for all size class in every CPU(my system is 12) during 20 sec. It shows 1% regression which is really small when we consider the benefit of this feature and realworkload overhead(i.e., most overhead comes from compression). Signed-off-by:
2016 Mar 21
2
[PATCH v2 17/18] zsmalloc: migrate tail pages in zspage
Hi Minchan, [auto build test WARNING on next-20160318] [cannot apply to v4.5-rc7 v4.5-rc6 v4.5-rc5 v4.5] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Minchan-Kim/Support-non-lru-page-migration/20160321-143339 coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >>
2016 Mar 21
2
[PATCH v2 17/18] zsmalloc: migrate tail pages in zspage
Hi Minchan, [auto build test WARNING on next-20160318] [cannot apply to v4.5-rc7 v4.5-rc6 v4.5-rc5 v4.5] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Minchan-Kim/Support-non-lru-page-migration/20160321-143339 coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >>
2016 Mar 11
31
[PATCH v1 00/19] Support non-lru page migration
Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on) and failed to fork easily. The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork easily.
2016 Mar 11
31
[PATCH v1 00/19] Support non-lru page migration
Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on) and failed to fork easily. The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork easily.
2016 Mar 21
22
[PATCH v2 00/18] Support non-lru page migration
Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on) and failed to fork easily. The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork easily.
2016 Mar 21
22
[PATCH v2 00/18] Support non-lru page migration
Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on) and failed to fork easily. The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork easily.
2016 Mar 30
33
[PATCH v3 00/16] Support non-lru page migration
Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on) and failed to fork easily. The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork easily.
2016 Mar 30
33
[PATCH v3 00/16] Support non-lru page migration
Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on) and failed to fork easily. The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork easily.