search for: opae

Dear LLVMer ; i'm trying to use LLVM for a specific target, using different memory banks. I have written the frontend to generate a valid IR and want to use the existing passes (as defined in tool opt) to optimize the code. The target has specific instructions, so following advices given in documentation, I created an intrinsic function, with attribute [IntrReadArgMem]. My test case is

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Julien Schmitt <jschmitt at dibcom.fr> wrote: > Dear LLVMer ; > > i'm trying to use LLVM for a specific target, using different memory banks. > I have written the frontend to generate a valid IR and want to use the > existing passes (as defined in tool opt) to optimize the code. > > The target has specific instructions, so following

Hi all, I'd like to force rematerialization by extending live intervals. For example: %vreg1 = opa %vreg2, %vreg3 ; RClassA:%vreg1, RClassB:%vreg2, RClassB:%vreg3 ... somewhere between --> %vreg2<kill> and %vreg3<kill> .. %vreg4 = opb %vreg1 ; RClassA:%vreg1, RClassB:%vreg4 In my case, %vreg1 is not spillable and I'd like to extend vreg2 and vreg3 live intervals to get

Thanks Eli. I will try your solution, but then, what is the difference between [IntrReadArgMem] and [IntrReadMem] when specifying an intrinsic ? It seems that both options specify that a function is 'readonly' (maybe the difference is not well supported for then moment ?) Julien > Dead store elimination is that pass that could do the optimizations in > question. The second

Thanks for the update. Are you updating nouveau for GK208 and GM206? Regards, On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Kyle McMartin <kyle at infradead.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:55:59PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > Hi linux-firmware maintainers, > > > > The following changes since commit > f66eccaab7d605d433cb82e389441b21ec99b40f: > > > >

Hi linux-firmware maintainers, The following changes since commit f66eccaab7d605d433cb82e389441b21ec99b40f: Update Intel OPA hfi1 firmware (2016-02-15 08:34:16 -0500) are available in the git repository at: https://github.com/Gnurou/linux-firmware.git secboot for you to fetch changes up to 8d1fd61a3723ab8cb6b7bfeb8be38e16282cc1ed: nvidia: Add GM20B signed firmware (2016-02-23

...C code following the annotation. A new optional [check] clause is under development to enable the automatic co-verification of the loopback output, i.e., Y, against the regular software execution. A new OpenMP 4.X libomptarget plugin was added to the Clang/LLVM compiler that leverages on the Intel OPAE library to build a seamless programming interface. HardCloud currently enables HARP and HARPSIM device plugins that are respectively associated with the Intel HARP2 architecture and its simulator. Design of the Microsoft Catapult plugin is underway. HardCloud adds two new IP-blocks to the basic I...

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:55:59PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Hi linux-firmware maintainers, > > The following changes since commit f66eccaab7d605d433cb82e389441b21ec99b40f: > > Update Intel OPA hfi1 firmware (2016-02-15 08:34:16 -0500) > > are available in the git repository at: > > https://github.com/Gnurou/linux-firmware.git secboot > > for you

On 06/23/2015 02:14 PM, ken wrote: > On 06/23/2015 11:49 AM, g wrote: >> >> hello Ken, >> >> am i correct to presume that you are getting the "Bcc:" of my post >> to the fedora list? > > g, > > I'm already subscribed to that list, so you needn't bcc me. I've read > your post there. Thanks for that. Very considerate of you.

greetings. trying to install yumex, but obviously have forgotten what i did previously to install packages. sudo yum install yumex* errors out with; No package yumex* available. please inform my chemo brain what is correct. tia. -- peace out. CentOS GNU/Linux 7.1511 tc,hago. g . =+= Tired of having your microsoft os hacked? Change to Linux os, used by microsoft hackers. =+= in a

Sorry I don't think my first trial worked I am just starting to use samba, and I keep running into the same problem time and again. I have installed SAMBA 2.0.2 correctly and have (i think) a correct smb.conf file. Now when I try to log on to one of my shares it will not let me in. I get the following errors when logging in: [dutchboy@lisa dutchboy]$ smbclient \\\\lisa\\dutchboy doing

Hi, I am new to GlusterFS. I have 2 computers with Intel Omni-Path hardware/software installed. RDMA is running ok on those according to "ibv_devices" output. GlusterFS "server" installed and set up ok on those. Peer probes on TCP-over-OPA worked ok. I created a replicated volume with transport=tcp, then tested them by mounting the volume on one of servers. Things worked

Several of these messages we coded using line continuation within a string literal. This is generally not recommended and also lead to odd sequences of many blanks in the middle of the messages. The message indicating a discarded write due to MSI-X already being enabled doesn''t need to be issued when a write doesn''t actually modify the current value. Adjust the surrounding logic

On 08/11/2016 07:42 AM, Harald Labes wrote: > Try "sudo yum install yumex" without *. It's a package distributed by > EPEL. Have you installed the EPEL repro? > ===> closer, but not like playing horseshoes. now need; GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 14] Could not open/read \ file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-6 > Cheers > !OPA! !METAXA! >

On 06/23/2015 11:49 AM, g wrote: > > hello Ken, > > am i correct to presume that you are getting the "Bcc:" of my post > to the fedora list? g, I'm already subscribed to that list, so you needn't bcc me. I've read your post there. Thanks for that. Very considerate of you. The main issue, getting back into the EWS has been resolved. See my long post

Hi, I tried to build and run libvirt-1.0.1 on FSL PowerPC platform. The connection to '/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock' is always refused. # libvirtd -d # export LIBVIRT_DEBUG=1 # export LIBVIRT_LOG_OUTPUTS="1:file:virsh.log" # virsh -c qemu:///system list 2013-01-10 04:55:20.409+0000: 2574: info : libvirt version: 1.0.1 2013-01-10 04:55:20.409+0000: 2574: debug :

If you're one of the people who has cvsup'd to 4.8-stable since August 8th and you've since begun to experience panics on a previously stable system, please apply the attached patch and see if your previous stability has been restored. Please tell me your results. Thanks, Mike "Silby" Silbersack -------------- next part -------------- diff -u -r

** Delivery incomplete ** There was a temporary problem delivering your message to curtiskwong101 at gmail.com. Gmail will retry for 47 more hours. You'll be notified if the delivery fails permanently. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20180919/7249d4a2/attachment-0002.html>

Hi guys, I''m just beginning to use RSpec and I ran into the issue of testing a named_scope. I''m not actually trying to test its behavior, as it''s not my code, but I wanted to test at least that it''s defined. I tried doing this: describe Post, ".most_recent" do it "should be defined" do Post.method_defined?(:most_recent).should be_true

This is release 1.0-rc4 of Wine, a free implementation of Windows on Unix. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Bug fixes only, we are in code freeze. Because of lags created by using mirrors, this message may reach you before the release is available at the public sites. The sources will be available from the following locations: