Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "opacity_matches".
Did you mean:
opacity_match
2007 May 21
2
Some suggestions for extra metadata
Here are a few extra attributes which I have not seen mentioned yet
which I think would be useful. Any comments would be appreciated.
*Version*
The version of the plugin, I think the reasons for this are obvious.
<version>
<major>0</major>
<minor>1</minor>
<patch>0</patch>
</version>
*Addition to features*
Just add an attribute to
2007 Jul 12
2
Metadata additions
...together</short>
<option .../>
...
</subgroup>
</group>
...
There are often a lot of different opinions how options should be grouped, but
this could be discussed after we have decided to add group/subgroup tags.
Currently the core has two lists (opacity_matches and opacity_values) that
should be handled together, because the opacity of the opacity_values list
will be assigned to the corresponding match in the match list. In ccs we
automatically combine such values if all options inside a subgroup have the
list type, but we could also add a combine=?tr...