search for: op3

...sible to get a register number to which the value is allocated to in MIPS in DAGToDAG class? More Specifically: SDValue Reg3 = Node->getOperand(3); if (RegisterSDNode *R = dyn_cast<RegisterSDNode>(Reg3)) { op3 = cast<RegisterSDNode>(Reg3)->getReg(); fprintf(stderr,"Op3 is register and regnum is %d\n",op3); } else if (ConstantSDNode *C = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Reg3)) { op3...

...which the value is allocated to in MIPS in DAGToDAG class? > > More Specifically: > SDValue Reg3 = Node->getOperand(3); > if (RegisterSDNode *R = dyn_cast<RegisterSDNode>(Reg3)) > { > op3 = cast<RegisterSDNode>(Reg3)->getReg(); > fprintf(stderr,"Op3 is register and regnum is %d\n",op3); > } > else if (ConstantSDNode *C = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Reg3)) > { >...

...o in MIPS in DAGToDAG class? > > > > More Specifically: > > SDValue Reg3 = Node->getOperand(3); > > if (RegisterSDNode *R = > dyn_cast<RegisterSDNode>(Reg3)) > > { > > op3 = cast<RegisterSDNode>(Reg3)->getReg(); > > fprintf(stderr,"Op3 is register and regnum is > %d\n",op3); > > } > > else if (ConstantSDNode *C = > dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Reg3)) > >...

Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. I've defined comparison def NErrb : InstTCE<(outs I1Regs:$op3), (ins I32Regs:$op1,I32Regs:$op2), "", [(set I1Regs:$op3, (setne I32Regs:$op1, I32Regs:$op2))]>; But then I end up having the following bug: Code %0 = zext i8 %data to i32 %1 = zext i16 %crc to i32 %2 = xor i32 %1, %0 %3 = and i32 %2, 1 %4 = icmp eq i32 %3, 0 which...

On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: > Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. > > I've defined comparison > > > def NErrb : InstTCE<(outs I1Regs:$op3), (ins I32Regs:$op1,I32Regs:$op2), "", [(set I1Regs:$op3, (setne I32Regs:$op1, I32Regs:$op2))]>; > > > > > But then I end up having the following bug: > > > Code > > > %0 = zext i8 %data to i32 > %1 = zext i16 %crc to i32 > %2 = xor i32...

...;> On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: >>>> >>>>> Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. >>>>> >>>>> I've defined comparison >>>>> >>>>> def NErrb : InstTCE<(outs I1Regs:$op3), (ins I32Regs:$op1,I32Regs:$op2), "", [(set I1Regs:$op3, (setne I32Regs:$op1, I32Regs:$op2))]>; >>>>> >>>>> But then I end up having the following bug: >>>>> >>>>> Code >>>>> >>>>> %0 = zext i...

...Core's instruction formats operands are not encoded into bits individually. instead they are combined into a single field using arithmetic operations before being inserted in the instruction. For example: ADD_3r is encoded as: 00010aaaaabbccdd where: aaaaa = op1[3...2] × 9 + op2[3...2] × 3 + op3[3..2] bb = op1[1..0] cc = op2[1..0] dd = op3[1..0] op1 - op3 are all in the range 0-11 and therefore aaaaa is in the range 0 - 26 I managed to get decoding of ADD_3r instructions to work by specifying the value of the bits that are fixed in the instruction format and using a custom DecoderMethod...

...inIn = Node->getOperand(0); SDValue Zero = CurDAG->getCopyFromReg(ChainIn, DL, Mips::ZERO, MVT::i32); SDValue op0 = Node->getOperand(2); SDValue op1 = Node->getOperand(3); SDValue op2= Node->getOperand(4); SDValue op3 = Node->getOperand(5); SDValue Ops[]= { op0, op1, op2, op3, Zero, ChainIn }; SDNode *Result = CurDAG->getMachineNode(Mips::BWT_DROP_RESULT, SDLoc(Node), ReturnValueVT, Ops); ReplaceUses(Node, Result);...

...>> On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: >>>> >>>>> Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. >>>>> >>>>> I've defined comparison >>>>> >>>>> def NErrb : InstTCE<(outs I1Regs:$op3), (ins I32Regs:$op1,I32Regs:$op2), "", [(set I1Regs:$op3, (setne I32Regs:$op1, I32Regs:$op2))]>; >>>>> >>>>> But then I end up having the following bug: >>>>> >>>>> Code >>>>> >>>>> %0 = zext i8 %...

On Sep 29, 2010, at 12:36 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: > On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: > >> Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. >> >> I've defined comparison >> >> def NErrb : InstTCE<(outs I1Regs:$op3), (ins I32Regs:$op1,I32Regs:$op2), "", [(set I1Regs:$op3, (setne I32Regs:$op1, I32Regs:$op2))]>; >> >> But then I end up having the following bug: >> >> Code >> >> %0 = zext i8 %data to i32 >> %1 = zext i16 %crc to i32 >> %2 = xor i32...

...2010, at 12:36 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote: > >> On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: >> >>> Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. >>> >>> I've defined comparison >>> >>> def NErrb : InstTCE<(outs I1Regs:$op3), (ins I32Regs:$op1,I32Regs:$op2), "", [(set I1Regs:$op3, (setne I32Regs:$op1, I32Regs:$op2))]>; >>> >>> But then I end up having the following bug: >>> >>> Code >>> >>> %0 = zext i8 %data to i32 >>> %1 = zext i16 %crc to i...

...wrote: >> >>> On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: >>> >>>> Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. >>>> >>>> I've defined comparison >>>> >>>> def NErrb : InstTCE<(outs I1Regs:$op3), (ins I32Regs:$op1,I32Regs:$op2), "", [(set I1Regs:$op3, (setne I32Regs:$op1, I32Regs:$op2))]>; >>>> >>>> But then I end up having the following bug: >>>> >>>> Code >>>> >>>> %0 = zext i8 %data to i32 >>&...

...operands are not encoded into bits individually. instead they are combined into a single field using arithmetic operations before being inserted in the instruction. For example: > > ADD_3r is encoded as: 00010aaaaabbccdd > > where: > > aaaaa = op1[3...2] × 9 + op2[3...2] × 3 + op3[3..2] > bb = op1[1..0] > cc = op2[1..0] > dd = op3[1..0] > > op1 - op3 are all in the range 0-11 and therefore aaaaa is in the range 0 - 26 > > I managed to get decoding of ADD_3r instructions to work by specifying the value of the bits that are fixed in the instruction forma...

...I've ran the good and bad bitcode files for a more compact example (attached) through llvm-bcanalyzer and diff: --- bad.xml 2013-01-09 22:57:58.691131492 +0400 +++ good.xml 2013-01-09 22:58:04.153133734 +0400 ... irrelevant ... <STRUCT_NAME abbrevid=7 op0=105 op1=46 op2=78 op3=105 op4=108 op5=67 op6=108 op7=97 op8=115 op9=115/> <STRUCT_NAMED abbrevid=8 op0=0 op1=0 op2=6/> <POINTER abbrevid=4 op0=7 op1=0/> - <STRUCT_ANON abbrevid=6 op0=0 op1=0 op2=6/> </TYPE_BLOCK_ID> <GLOBALVAR abbrevid=4 op0=8 op1=0 op2=2 op3=0 op4=0...

...and i need some help. Please, ¿do you know a function how can process cross tables for many variables and show the result in one table who look like this?: +----------------------------------------------------+ |------------------ | X variable | |----------------- | Xop1 | Xop2 | Xop3|.....| +----------------------------------------------------+ |Yvar1 | Total | %row..........................| | | Op1 | %row..........................| | | Op2 | %row..........................| |+---------------------------------------------------+ |Yvar2 | Op1 | %row............

...06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've defined comparison >>>>>> >>>>>> def NErrb : InstTCE<(outs I1Regs:$op3), (ins I32Regs:$op1,I32Regs:$op2), "", [(set I1Regs:$op3, (setne I32Regs:$op1, I32Regs:$op2))]>; >>>>>> >>>>>> But then I end up having the following bug: >>>>>> >>>>>> Code >>>>>> >>>...

...STri : F3_2<3, 0b000100, (outs), (ins MEMri:$addr, IntRegs:$src), "st $src, [$addr]", [(store IntRegs:$src, ADDRri:$addr)]>; F3_2 and it's superclasses are defined as follows: class F3_2<bits<2> opVal, bits<6> op3val, dag outs, dag ins, string asmstr, list<dag> pattern> : F3<outs, ins, asmstr, pattern> { bits<13> simm13; let op = opVal; let op3 = op3val; let Inst{13} = 1; // i field = 1 let Inst{12-0} = simm13; } class F3<dag outs, dag ins,...

Hello. I've managed to create a bitcode file (attached; also available at [1]) which produces a series of identical errors when verified: | Global variable initializer type does not match global variable type! | %i.NilClass* @nil When ran through llvm-dis and recompiled, through, it verifies successfully. If I disassemble it one more time, the result is identical to the first

...t suggests, but I conclude with nothing helpful to my work. The result of my experiment is attached. It is a simple add program, and from the bc file generated by llvm-bcanalyzer I cannot relate it to the original IR. For example, the expressions of <INST_STORE2 op0=6 op1=1 op2=3 op3=0/> <INST_STORE2 op0=5 op1=3 op2=3 op3=0/> actually represent those of store i32 1, i32* %a, align 4 store i32 2, i32* %b, align 4 in the .ll file. Despite the explicit opcode matches in the two forms, I am confused of the information of op0, op1 etc in the .bc file...

You need to add pop3. Please note that op3 is not secure as password and username is transferred in plain text. *firewall-cmd --add-service=pop3 --permanent* *firewall-cmd --reload--* *Eero* 2016-07-14 11:43 GMT+03:00 Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua>: > > Thursday, July 14, 2016, 11:32:31...