search for: oos

In order to get an OpenOffice configuration that is closer in compatibility with MS Office 2007, I removed the standard OO in 5.4 via yum and installed the latest (3.2.0) from OpenOffice.org. Ran that config for many months without a problem. However, when I allowed the upgrade to 5.5, OO broke. I finally had to remove all traces of OO 3.2.0, and start over. That worked...until yum tells me that

...caused it to crash with a fatal pagefault. However, on inspection of the page tables, the guests'' view of the pagetables was consistent: the page was present. Disabling the out-of-sync optimization made this problem go away. Eventually, I tracked it down to the fault fast path and the OOS code in sh_page_fault(). Here''s what happens: * CPU 0 has a page fault for a PTE in an OOS page that hasn''t been synched yet * CPU 1 has the same page fault (or at least one involving the same L1 page) * CPU 1 enters the fast path * CPU 0 finds the L1 page OOS and starts a resy...

This way it is possible to override the UUIDs of the uploaded disks, instead of letting RHV generate them. This can be useful to force certain UUIDs, and to specify the disks in --no-copy mode (which now can be used). --- v2v/output_rhv_upload.ml | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- v2v/rhv-upload-plugin.py | 2 ++ v2v/virt-v2v-output-rhv.pod | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files

Random old patch that I had in my queue. Posting it as a backup, it is still untested. Rich.

Hi, There has been discussion about the OpenStack output and Richard asked for a public thread on this list, so here it is. For v2v from VMware to RHV, there is a Python script that does some extra steps to create the virtual machine after the disks have been converted. We want to have the same behavior for OpenStack, i.e. have virt-v2v create the instance once the volumes have been created.

Hi, Being relatively new to OO programming and not so old on R, I noticed the possibility to do OO programming in R. But it seems there is two "paradigms" S3 that seems the old one but is the one used in the R.oo package and S4 which seems more recent As a starting point, which one is best to use? Is R.oo useful? what are the main difference between the two? Any feedback

Firstly hi to everyone on the list, I am new to this list ans also R so please forgive the simplicity of my questions over the next few months. I have version R 1.9.1 and want to perform z-scoring for a benchmarking procedure. I have tried to install Henrik Bengtsson's R.classes bundle (http://www.maths.lth.se/help/R/R.classes). I have downloaded the .zip file and placed the relevant folders

Hi All, A group of about 3-4 of us are looking into the possibility of incorporating R into OpenOffice's (OO) spreadsheet component (sc) . We wish to use OO's nice ODBC ability to query a postgresql-based gene expression database thus populating an OO sc and then use Bioconductor via R to analyse user-selected parts of this spreadsheet. We've looked at and compiled and used

The first patch restricts passthrough parameters to ones matching "os-*". This was how it was documented, but not how it was implemented. The second patch is the same as v2 here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-November/msg00187.html Rich.

If ‘virt-v2v -oo verify-server-certificate=false’ is used then ‘openstack --insecure’ flag is added whenever we invoke the openstack command. This turns off SSL certificate validation. The default is to verify the server certificate (which is the default of the openstack command). --- v2v/output_openstack.ml | 16 +++++++++++++++- v2v/test-v2v-o-openstack.sh | 2 ++

> there is no such information. You can still consider every type to have values > in, say, T = [-2^31; 2^31-1]. Probably you are trying to deduce an interval of > possible values for each register. You will need to allow intervals to wrap > around the end of T since (eg) the basic "add" operator in LLVM uses modulo > arithmetic, i.e. if you add 1 to 2^31-1 you get

From: Alban Lecorps <alban.lecorps at ubisoft.com> The "-oo" option will be useful primarily for the openstack output mode (currently disabled, from commit b74c126629e3, "Ignore 'openstack' driver", 2020-03-16). Use a ConfigStringList knob for "-oo", and for each OPTION=VALUE element in that list, create a separate "-oo OPTION=VALUE" option.

It makes little sense to require the oVirt certificate, especially when the verification of the connection (-oo rhv-verifypeer) is disabled by default. The only work done with the certificate in that case is checking that it is a valid certificate file. Hence, make -oo rhv-cafile optional, requiring it only when -oo rhv-verifypeer is enabled. --- v2v/output_rhv_upload.ml | 16

Hi, I was wondering if anybody might have a reference for me: My R code is growing and getting more and more confusing. Thus, I figure it's time to switch to object-oriented again. I have done oo programming in C++ and Java before but the first few tutorial on R oo were a bit confusing for me. Is there any brief tutorial on oo programming in R especially for people who have done oo in Java

Hi all, I'm trying to do some object-oriented programming in R using the R.oo package. Right from the start I encountered a strange (at least for me) problem. I define a new class/constructor based on the R.oo documentation. However the first attempt to create an object fails: === Code: === library(R.oo); setConstructorS3("MyClass",function(param) { print(param);

On Thursday, 19 September 2019 13:16:01 CEST Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:38:41PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > >This way it is possible to override the UUIDs of the uploaded disks, > >instead of letting RHV generate them. > > > >This can be useful to force certain UUIDs, and to specify the disks in > >--no-copy mode (which now can be used).

Can someone show me how to modify one (R.oo) class's object inside another (R.oo) class's method? Is that possible with the R.oo package? A quick example or reference to an example would be outstanding... Thanks, Ben [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I got the following warnings when I install R.oo. Are these warnings normal? Should I reinstall the package as mentioned in the warnings? How to reinstall? The sessionInfo() is at the end. > install.packages("R.oo", dependencies=T) Warning in install.packages("R.oo", dependencies = T) : argument 'lib' is missing: using '/utility/R' also installing the

There are different way to make R classes. I know R.oo and S4. I'm wondering which one is the current popular one. Which one is current recommended when make new R packages? Thank you!

hello this is the error chan_vpb.cc: In function \u2018void mkbrd(vpb_model_t, int)\u2019: chan_vpb.cc:1530: aviso: la dereferencia de punteros de tipo castigado romper las reglas de alias estricto chan_vpb.cc: In function \u2018ast_channel* vpb_new(vpb_pvt*, ast_channel_state, char*)\u2019: chan_vpb.cc:2671: aviso: comparacin entre expresiones enteras signed y unsigned g++ -c -o chan_vpb.o