Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "oopsla".
Did you mean:
oopla
2006 Aug 15
1
[LLVMdev] Fwd: OOPLSA 2006 Call for Participation
...<jwd at VIRGINIA.EDU>
Date: August 15, 2006 11:27:06 AM ADT
To: SIGPLAN-ANNOUNCE at LISTSERV.ACM.ORG
Subject: OOPLSA 2006 Call for Participation
Reply-To: Jack Davidson <jwd at VIRGINIA.EDU>
ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems,
Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA 2006)
OOPSLA 2006 will be held October 22-26 in historic Portland, Oregon
(USA). You can learn all about OOPSLA at www.oopsla.org, and/or
download the Advance Program PDF at http://www.oopsla.org/2006//
program/oopsla_06_advance_program.pdf .
OOPSLA is the premier gathering of professionals...
2016 Dec 31
3
Automatic Insertion of OpenACC/OpenMP directives
....org/ProjectsWithLLVM/). There are a number
of papers that describe what dawn-cc does. The main publication is
this paper:
* Automatic Insertion of Copy Annotation in Data-Parallel Programs -
SBAC-PAD 2016
The array size inference analysis comes from this work:
* Runtime Pointer Disambiguation - OOPSLA 2015
The source code of dawn-cc, including all the static analyses, is available at:
* https://github.com/gleisonsdm/DawnCC-Compiler
And, as I've mentioned, you can try it through an online interface:
* cuda.dcc.ufmg.br/dawn
Feel free to report bugs, or send us questions.
Fernando
2005 Oct 05
2
Seattle Railers gathering for a beer
This is a general invite to any/all Railers in the Seattle area who want to
get together for beer/food. Nothing formal, just a "get to know ya"
gathering.
Details:
Thursday, Oct 13 (next week), 7pm
Bellevue Red Robin - *http://tinyurl.com/d678c*
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
D''Andrew "Dave" Thompson
http://dathompson.blogspot.com
2017 Apr 25
2
Contributing a new sanitizer for pointer casts
...a
huge loss given that the runtime also will be.
Oh, and runtime support exists for x86-64/Linux only at the moment,
though there is a bit of code for FreeBSD.
For the interested, here are the research papers I mentioned.
"Dynamically diagnosing run-time type errors in unsafe code" (OOPSLA '16)
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~srk31/#oopsla16a
"Towards a dynamic object model within Unix processes" (Onward! '15)
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~srk31/#onward15
Code: <https://github.com/stephenrkell/liballocs>
<https://github.com/stephenrkell/libcrunch>
<https://gith...
2016 Dec 31
0
Automatic Insertion of OpenACC/OpenMP directives
...gt; of papers that describe what dawn-cc does. The main publication is
> this paper:
>
> * Automatic Insertion of Copy Annotation in Data-Parallel Programs -
> SBAC-PAD 2016
>
> The array size inference analysis comes from this work:
>
> * Runtime Pointer Disambiguation - OOPSLA 2015
>
> The source code of dawn-cc, including all the static analyses, is available at:
>
> * https://github.com/gleisonsdm/DawnCC-Compiler
>
> And, as I've mentioned, you can try it through an online interface:
>
> * cuda.dcc.ufmg.br/dawn
>
> Feel free to re...
2017 Oct 15
2
IR Pass Ordering Sensitivity
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 10:58:17PM -0500, Kavon Farvardin via llvm-dev wrote:
> > something simpler will do, IMHO. Happy to discuss this further if
> > folks are in California next week :)
>
> Yes, I'll be in California next week, let's chat!
>
> We could make use of the autotuner I'm currently building:
>
> https://github.com/kavon/autotune
>
>
2016 Dec 31
2
Automatic Insertion of OpenACC/OpenMP directives
...hat dawn-cc does. The main publication is
>> this paper:
>>
>> * Automatic Insertion of Copy Annotation in Data-Parallel Programs -
>> SBAC-PAD 2016
>>
>> The array size inference analysis comes from this work:
>>
>> * Runtime Pointer Disambiguation - OOPSLA 2015
>>
>> The source code of dawn-cc, including all the static analyses, is available at:
>>
>> * https://github.com/gleisonsdm/DawnCC-Compiler
>>
>> And, as I've mentioned, you can try it through an online interface:
>>
>> * cuda.dcc.ufmg.br/daw...
2017 Apr 26
2
Contributing a new sanitizer for pointer casts
Hi Vedant,
> I enjoyed reading through your EuroLLVM slides and OOPSLA paper.
> Detecting the creation of contract-violating pointers is an
> interesting idea, and your paper demonstrates that the checking can
> be comprehensive and effective.
Glad you enjoyed them. :-)
> However, I have concerns about the quality of diagnostics, the
> complexity of t...
2011 Apr 11
12
Freelance Developer using Rails
Hi all,
Is anyone doing freelance rails development? I need some advice
before I jump in.
Thanks,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
2017 Apr 04
8
[RFC] Design of a TBAA sanitizer
Hi everyone,
At EuroLLVM, Chandler and I chatted about the design for a potential
TBAA sanitizer. Here's my attempt to summarize:
C/C++ have type-based aliasing rules, and LLVM's optimizer can exploit
these given TBAA metadata added by Clang. Roughly, a pointer of given
type cannot be used to access an object of a different type (with, of
course, certain exceptions). Unfortunately,
2017 Apr 10
2
[RFC] Design of a TBAA sanitizer
...gt;
> Stephen.
>
> PS: on top of the EuroLLVM '16 talk, in case you're wondering about how
> my system works, the following research papers might help. Or feel free
> just to ask questions....
>
> - "Dynamically diagnosing run-time type errors in unsafe code" (OOPSLA '16)
> <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~srk31/#oopsla16a>
>
> - "Towards a dynamic object model within Unix processes" (Onward '15)
> <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~srk31/#onward15>
>
> ... or code if you prefer:
> <https://github.com/stephenrkell/liballocs...
2007 Aug 24
26
testing behaviour or testing code?
hypothetical question for all you BDD experts:
I want to make sure that a :list action always returns widgets in
alphabetical order. There''s at least 2 ways of doing this:
it "should fetch items in alphabetical order" do
Widget.should_receive(:find).with(:order => "name ASC")
get :list
end
it "should fetch items in alphabetical order" do
[:red,
2007 Dec 06
43
Mocks? Really?
OK, so i''ve played a bit with mocks and mock_models in controller and
view tests and i have a question. Is this statement really correct:
"We highly recommend that you exploit the mock framework here rather
than providing real model objects in order to keep the view specs
isolated from changes to your models."
(http://rspec.rubyforge.org/documentation/rails/writing/views.html