Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "oopack_v1p8".
2007 Aug 25
0
[LLVMdev] ccbench: compiler shotout benchmark script
...mandel-text.cpp 0.14 0.49 1309 276 8 llvm-g++-bc -Os
mandel-text.cpp 0.23 0.26 1260 264 8 llvm-g++ -O2
mandel-text.cpp 0.24 0.26 1260 264 8 llvm-g++ -Os
mandel-text.cpp 0.27 0.47 1636 296 4 icc -O0
oopack_v1p8.cpp 0.62 1.07 14580 1288 118500 icc -O2
oopack_v1p8.cpp 0.66 0.88 5398 352 116256 g++-4.1 -O2
oopack_v1p8.cpp 0.66 0.94 5630 352 116256 g++-4.2 -O2
oopack_v1p8.cpp 0.76 0.97 13909 1292 118500 icc -Os
oopack_v1p8...
2006 Nov 08
0
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Next Steps
...^^ PR990
llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/except
jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/except
cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/except
llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib
jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib
^^ C++ EH again
llc /SingleSource/CustomChecked/oopack_v1p8
cbe /SingleSource/CustomChecked/oopack_v1p8
^^ Not sure, but I suspect its lack of vector support again.
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 22:39 -0800, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
> I created the 1.9 release branch last night. As a reminder, please do not
> check in any code changes to the release branch...
2006 Nov 08
6
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Next Steps
I created the 1.9 release branch last night. As a reminder, please do not
check in any code changes to the release branch. Please send me email if
you have changes that need to be merged into the release branch.
To check out the release branch:
cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm
cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm-test
cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...rce/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_v1p2 | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/oopack_v1p8 | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ackermann | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary3...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...1 * 1.15 | n/a 0.95 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text | 0.0182 3204 0.0157 * 0.0150 | 3.76 11.95 4.03 * 4.05 | 0.31 0.93 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/oopack_v1p8 | 0.0697 11920 0.0566 * 0.0530 | 0.54 1.47 0.65 * 0.72 | 0.37 0.83 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/ray | 0.1097 17496 0.0580 * 0.0498...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...4 * 1.67 | 1.04 1.01 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text | 0.0040 1216 0.0080 * 0.0080 | 4.29 13.79 4.90 * 5.16 | 0.31 0.88 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/oopack_v1p8 | 0.0480 11404 0.0560 * 0.0560 | 0.38 1.61 0.80 * 0.87 | 0.24 0.47 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/ray | 0.1160 15724 0.0640 * 0.0600...
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...3 * 1.94 | n/a 0.96 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text | 0.0196 3396 0.0190 * 0.0168 | 3.33 11.08 3.76 * 3.78 | 0.30 0.89 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/oopack_v1p8 | 0.0871 11632 0.0519 * 0.0470 | 0.32 0.97 0.61 * 0.68 | 0.33 0.52 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/ray | 0.0950 15680 0.0546 * 0.0423...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...9 * 2.90 | n/a 0.98 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text | 0.0071 3224 0.0075 * 0.0074 | 2.07 3.25 2.01 * 2.04 | 0.64 1.03 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/oopack_v1p8 | 0.0890 12816 0.0327 * 0.0247 | 0.23 0.34 0.28 * 0.34 | 0.68 0.82 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/ray | 0.0451 17532 0.0266 * 0.0240...
2018 Apr 26
0
Compare test-suite benchmarks performance complied without TBAA, with default TBAA and with new TBAA struct path
...|0.192312746| -0.44| 513516314| 0.01|0.192279701| -0.43| 513516313| 0.01|
|SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text.test | 40|1.094141275| 5480623268|1.093537162| 0.06| 5480623264| 0|1.093854114| 0.03| 5480623264| 0|
|SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/oopack_v1p8.test | 256|0.082014067| 532366158|0.081900482| 0.14| 532366155| 0|0.081939047| 0.09| 532366154| 0|
|SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container.test | 40|2.340649713| 5147979419|2.344395208| -0.16| 5147328718| 0.01|2.342970...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
....77 | n/a 1.00 n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text |
> 0.0000 1016 0.0100 * 0.0100 | 2.26 2.26
> 2.25 * 2.25 | 1.00 1.00 n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/oopack_v1p8 |
> 0.0700 9528 0.0400 * 0.0500 | 0.17 0.18
> 0.18 * 0.24 | 0.94 0.94 n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/ray |
> 0.0800 17220 0.0700 * ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-
> text | 0.0000 1016 0.0100
> * 0.0100 | 2.26 2.26 2.25 *
> 2.25 | 1.00 1.00 n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/
> oopack_v1p8 | 0.0700 9528
> 0.0400 * 0.0500 | 0.17 0.18 0.18
> * 0.24 | 0.94 0.94 n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/
> ray | 0.0800 17220
> 0.0700...
2015 Feb 26
5
[LLVMdev] [RFC] AArch64: Should we disable GlobalMerge?
Hi all,
I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on
ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for
AArch64.
As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB
(AArch64, 128B on ARM).
At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost
free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".
2011 Dec 01
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...mpile=on>
> 2.17% 0.4987 0.5095 0.0014
> MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod.compile
> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FApplications%2Fsiod%2Fsiod.compile=on>
> 2.16% 2.2219 2.2698 0.0037
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/oopack_v1p8.compile
> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.SingleSource%2FBenchmarks%2FMisc-C%2B%2B%2Foopack_v1p8.compile=on>
> 2.15% 0.1255 0.1282 0.0004
> External/SPEC/CINT2000/256_bzip2/256_bzip2.compile
> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...0.02 67347 0 0.01 67347
occur.ll 25 259711 8 0.03 264072 * * *
ocean.ll 58 124487 7 0.02 124319 3 0.02 122000
office.ll 17 43233 0 0.01 43202 0 0.01 43202
OffsetStream.ll 9 18147 0 0.01 18115 0 0.01 18115
ofstream_ctor.ll 13 28636 0 0.01 28620 0 0.01 28620
oggenc.ll 432 6252845 1 0.50 6251994 * * *
oopack_v1p8.ll 48 93691 0 0.02 93670 0 0.01 94249
oourafft.ll 12 212077 0 0.03 212062 0 0.03 212062
OpenArchive.ll 24 360906 0 0.03 360871 0 0.03 360871
OpenCallbackConsole.ll 7 19402 1 0.01 19174 1 0.01 19174
openFiles.ll 1 27101 0 0.01 27076 0 0.01 27076
opening.ll 1 8978 0 0.01 8952 0 0.01 8952
openpl.ll 1...