search for: oopack

...lexvn.freeservers.com/s1/perfometer.html > > Latest version is 2.8.0-1.18. Its description can be ssen at > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c%2B%2B.perfometer/39 I downloaded this and took a quick look at it. It looks like an interesting suite of benchmarks, similar in design to oopack. Unfortunately, it does not compile with LLVM (or GCC 3.4), as the source is not compliant with two phase name lookup. I get errors such as: $ llvmg++ -O3 -I. -DOPT_LEVEL=-1 -W -Wall -c pfmeter.cpp In file included from pfmeter2.h:50, from pfmeter.cpp:44: pfmeter.h: In destructor...

...ometer.html > > > > Latest version is 2.8.0-1.18. Its description can be ssen at > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c%2B%2B.perfometer/39 > > I downloaded this and took a quick look at it. It looks like an > interesting suite of benchmarks, similar in design to oopack. > Unfortunately, it does not compile with LLVM (or GCC 3.4), as the source > is not compliant with two phase name lookup. I get errors such as: > > $ llvmg++ -O3 -I. -DOPT_LEVEL=-1 -W -Wall -c pfmeter.cpp > In file included from pfmeter2.h:50, > from pfmeter.cpp...

"Chris Lattner" <sabre at nondot.org> wrote in message news:Pine.LNX.4.44.0410051204480.5863-100000 at nondot.org... > On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Alex Vinokur wrote: > > > I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers. > > Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at > >

Dear All, Thanks to the testing done by Bill Wendling, we have the following list of regressions for PPC: TEST (cbe) 'exception_spec_test' FAILED! ******************** TEST (cbe) 'function_try_block' FAILED! ******************** Oopack (jit, llc, and cbe) also fails, but I don't know if that's a regression or not. I'm alright with releasing with these regressions (they're exception handling issues), but if someone wants to fix these in the release branch, that's fine. Tanya, do you have any results to rep...