search for: oooooooh

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "oooooooh".

Did you mean: ooooooo
2008 Apr 23
2
[LLVMdev] getting closer!
...data. >> >> Ok, so I pass it an arbitrary struct pointer and it just gives it >> back later for me to peruse, right? > > Yep! You can use any constant pointer (which means: any global > variable, alias, or function). For example, something like this: > > [snip] Oooooooh! man! that is exactly what I was looking for. hooray! Input/Output pairs are the best way to learn this stuff as far as I can tell. I believe I have enough from this to construct a collector using the "shadow-stack" mechanism. thanks so much! "All our roots are belong to...
2008 Apr 23
0
[LLVMdev] getting closer!
...uild this >> expression. > > I'm always using the pure text input headline generating everything > from Java... Normally I'd say that's masochism, but you may have a handle on text templates. :) >> For example, something like this: > > [snip] > > Oooooooh! man! that is exactly what I was looking for. hooray! > Input/Output pairs are the best way to learn this stuff as far as I > can tell. > > I believe I have enough from this to construct a collector using the > "shadow-stack" mechanism. thanks so much! Excellent...
2008 Apr 23
1
[LLVMdev] getting closer!
...TLR+StringTemplates makes it pretty darn easy to generate the IR using any ANTLR target (C, C#, Python, ActionScript, Java, soon others). Much better than having to code in C/C++ in my view [ducking]. ;) >>> For example, something like this: >> >> [snip] >> >> Oooooooh! man! that is exactly what I was looking for. hooray! >> Input/Output pairs are the best way to learn this stuff as far as I >> can tell. >> >> I believe I have enough from this to construct a collector using the >> "shadow-stack" mechanism. thanks so much...
2008 Apr 22
0
[LLVMdev] getting closer!
Hi again Terence, On Apr 22, 2008, at 15:20, Terence Parr wrote: > Sorry for the long questions...gotta figure this out. Not a problem! > On Apr 21, 2008, at 6:23 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > >> On Apr 21, 2008, at 20:09, Terence Parr wrote: >> >>> Ok, I *might* be getting this from the assembly code. ... From >>> that, it will push/pop in
2008 Apr 22
2
[LLVMdev] getting closer!
On Apr 21, 2008, at 6:23 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On Apr 21, 2008, at 20:09, Terence Parr wrote: > >> Ok, I *might* be getting this from the assembly code. ... From >> that, it will push/pop in functions? If so, that's easy enough. :) > > Yup! Sounds like you've got it. Yup, what i was missing and what somebody should add to the doc is that