Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "oooooooh".
Did you mean:
ooooooo
2008 Apr 23
2
[LLVMdev] getting closer!
...data.
>>
>> Ok, so I pass it an arbitrary struct pointer and it just gives it
>> back later for me to peruse, right?
>
> Yep! You can use any constant pointer (which means: any global
> variable, alias, or function). For example, something like this:
>
>
[snip]
Oooooooh! man! that is exactly what I was looking for. hooray!
Input/Output pairs are the best way to learn this stuff as far as I
can tell.
I believe I have enough from this to construct a collector using the
"shadow-stack" mechanism. thanks so much!
"All our roots are belong to...
2008 Apr 23
0
[LLVMdev] getting closer!
...uild this
>> expression.
>
> I'm always using the pure text input headline generating everything
> from Java...
Normally I'd say that's masochism, but you may have a handle on text
templates. :)
>> For example, something like this:
>
> [snip]
>
> Oooooooh! man! that is exactly what I was looking for. hooray!
> Input/Output pairs are the best way to learn this stuff as far as I
> can tell.
>
> I believe I have enough from this to construct a collector using the
> "shadow-stack" mechanism. thanks so much!
Excellent...
2008 Apr 23
1
[LLVMdev] getting closer!
...TLR+StringTemplates makes it pretty darn
easy to generate the IR using any ANTLR target (C, C#, Python,
ActionScript, Java, soon others).
Much better than having to code in C/C++ in my view [ducking]. ;)
>>> For example, something like this:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Oooooooh! man! that is exactly what I was looking for. hooray!
>> Input/Output pairs are the best way to learn this stuff as far as I
>> can tell.
>>
>> I believe I have enough from this to construct a collector using the
>> "shadow-stack" mechanism. thanks so much...
2008 Apr 22
0
[LLVMdev] getting closer!
Hi again Terence,
On Apr 22, 2008, at 15:20, Terence Parr wrote:
> Sorry for the long questions...gotta figure this out.
Not a problem!
> On Apr 21, 2008, at 6:23 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
>
>> On Apr 21, 2008, at 20:09, Terence Parr wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I *might* be getting this from the assembly code. ... From
>>> that, it will push/pop in
2008 Apr 22
2
[LLVMdev] getting closer!
On Apr 21, 2008, at 6:23 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2008, at 20:09, Terence Parr wrote:
>
>> Ok, I *might* be getting this from the assembly code. ... From
>> that, it will push/pop in functions? If so, that's easy enough. :)
>
> Yup! Sounds like you've got it.
Yup, what i was missing and what somebody should add to the doc is
that