search for: onnet

Now the attributes are correctly read for the user test at onnet.ch <mailto:test at onnet.ch>, but other users are not able to authenticate anymore. root at buserver:/var/spool/postfix/virtual/onnet.ch/test/Maildir/.super# doveadm user test at onnet.ch field value uid 5000 gid 5000 home /var/spool/postfix/virtual/onnet.ch/test/ mail maildir:~/Maildir quot...

...the ldap userdb, it should not have prevented users from logging in. What happens if you do userdb { ? driver = passwd-file ? args = .... ? skip = notfound ? result_failure = continue-ok } Aki On 07.08.2018 12:58, Simeon Ott wrote: > Now the attributes are correctly read for the user test at onnet.ch > <mailto:test at onnet.ch>, but other users are not able to authenticate > anymore. > > root at buserver:/var/spool/postfix/virtual/onnet.ch/test/Maildir/.super# > <http://onnet.ch/test/Maildir/.super#> doveadm user test at onnet.ch > <mailto:test at onnet.ch&gt...

...rname_format=%Lu /etc/dovecot/share.passwd driver = passwd-file } protocol lmtp { mail_plugins = zlib quota acl sieve } protocol lda { auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master deliver_log_format = msgid=%m: %$ mail_plugins = zlib quota acl sieve postmaster_address = postmaster at onnet.ch } protocol imap { mail_plugins = zlib quota acl imap_quota imap_acl } protocol sieve { info_log_path = /var/log/sieve.log log_path = /var/log/sieve.log mail_max_userip_connections = 10 managesieve_implementation_string = Dovecot Pigeonhole managesieve_logout_format = bytes=%i/%o ma...

Ah. You probably need to change ldap userdb so that you add userdb { driver = ldap ? args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf result_success = continue-ok } so that the next one is processed. you can use 'doveadm user test at onnet.ch' to verify that the attributes are read for this user, and with another username that they are not. Aki On 07.08.2018 12:23, Simeon Ott wrote: > ? attached the dovecot -n, linked files, debug log lines during a > standard client login > > root at buserver:/etc/dovecot/conf.d#...

still the same? root at buserver:/etc/dovecot# doveadm user test2 at onnet.ch field valueuserdb lookup: user test2 at onnet.ch doesn't exist relevant config output from doveconf -n userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf driver = ldap result_success = continue-ok } userdb { args = username_format=%Lu /etc/dovecot/share.passwd driver = passwd-file r...

May you please clarify that? Where should I omit the userdb_ prefix? Which of my attempts are you pointing at? As stated, I omitted the userdb_ prefix when working with an LDAP attribute. > On 7 Aug 2018, at 10:03, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > with ldap userdb, you need to omit the userdb_ prefix. > > Aki > > > On 07.08.2018 10:54, Simeon Ott

http://repo.dovecot.org/ <http://repo.dovecot.org/> Sami > On 8 Aug 2018, at 10.27, Simeon Ott <simeon.ott at onnet.ch> wrote: > > Okay, this seems to be due to the fact that the option ?use_globals_only" is supported only in v2.2.31+ > We are on Debian jessie with dovecot v2.2.13 ? even an upgrade to current stable stretch won?t help (dovecot v2.2.27). So we will wait until the packages find t...

Hello Is it possible to limit the ability of sharing it?s own mailboxes to only a few users? We have a few sensitive mailboxes of users where the ability to share via IMAP SETACL should be prevented. I tried the following so far? doveadm acl remove -u test at onnet.ch INBOX user=test at onnet.ch admin but when doing this the admin rights are still there doveadm acl rights -u test at onnet.ch INBOX vmail at buserver:~$ doveadm acl rights -u test at onnet.ch INBOX Rights...

...ot; is supported only in v2.2.31+ We are on Debian jessie with dovecot v2.2.13 ? even an upgrade to current stable stretch won?t help (dovecot v2.2.27). So we will wait until the packages find their way into the repository. thanks anyway > On 7 Aug 2018, at 13:00, Simeon Ott <simeon.ott at onnet.ch> wrote: > but, did you read my last note anyway? > IMPORTANT NOTE: anyway.. even with this options set (acl and acl_globals_only) the user test at onnet.ch <mailto:test at onnet.ch> is still able to share its own folders?! > > root at buserver:/etc/dovecot# doveadm user tes...

You could do userdb { ?? driver = username_format=%Lu passwd-file ?? args = /etc/dovecot/share.passwd } #? /etc/dovecot/share.passwd test at onnet.ch::::::: userdb_acl=vfile:/etc/dovecot/dovecot-acl userdb_acl_globals_only = yes should prevent the user from modifying any ACL files. Aki On 05.08.2018 17:04, Simeon Ott wrote: > Hello > > Is it possible to limit the ability of sharing it?s own mailboxes to > only a few users? >...

Hello Is it possible to limit the ability of sharing it?s own mailboxes to only a few users? We have a few sensitive mailboxes of users where the ability to share via IMAP SETACL should be prevented. I tried the following so far? doveadm acl remove -u test at onnet.ch <mailto:test at onnet.ch> INBOX user=test at onnet.ch <mailto:user=test at onnet.ch> admin but when doing this the admin rights are still there doveadm acl rights -u test at onnet.ch <mailto:test at onnet.ch> INBOX vmail at buserver:~$ doveadm acl rights -u test at onnet.c...

...ecot } service lmtp { unix_listener lmtp { mode = 0666 } } service managesieve-login { inet_listener sieve { port = 4190 } inet_listener sieve_deprecated { port = 2000 } process_min_avail = 1 service_count = 1 vsz_limit = 64 M } ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/private/startssl-onnet.ch <http://startssl-onnet.ch/>-chain.crt ssl_cipher_list = ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256...

I'm running into a problem with Win95 clients and I hope someone has a fix for this. Our servers are Solaris boxes providing file services via both NFS and samba (1.9.16p11). The Win95 clients were recently upgraded to the latest version of FTP Software OnNet which makes the NFS stuff almost transparent to the users. I'm not sure how OnNet hooks in to Win95 but you could map a drive to \\server\home and it's smart enough to figure out that the server has NFS exported /export/home and mount that. The problem is when the Win95 client tries to get...

...e server out there using this repository? Simeon > On 8 Aug 2018, at 09:41, Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > > http://repo.dovecot.org/ <http://repo.dovecot.org/> > > Sami > > >> On 8 Aug 2018, at 10.27, Simeon Ott <simeon.ott at onnet.ch <mailto:simeon.ott at onnet.ch>> wrote: >> >> Okay, this seems to be due to the fact that the option ?use_globals_only" is supported only in v2.2.31+ >> We are on Debian jessie with dovecot v2.2.13 ? even an upgrade to current stable stretch won?t help (dovecot v...

...ents, but I don't have them drilled down to a depth of 10. I'm thinking the error text is wrong. Maybe you can't have more than 10 includes? And is it talking about #include or include=> ? None of the .conf files included here have any include statements. [OffNet] ; lines removed [OnNet] ; lines removed include => OffNet [comp_wildwildwest] #include "inc/wildwildwest/features.conf" #include "inc/wildwildwest/blocked-outgoing.conf" #include "inc/wildwildwest/blocked-incoming.conf" [user_3250071] #include "inc/wildwildwest/3250071/features.con...

Hi list, I'm interested in receiving incoming call to my Asterisk PBX thru an 1800 number. Anybody knows a provider with best minute rate? I heard that that Nufone can provide this service for around 3cents/min for calls made within 48 continental states. Any provider that can give better rate, even with additional limitation such as much few states that a call can originate? How do

...ents, but I don't have them drilled down to a depth of 10. I'm thinking the error text is wrong. Maybe you can't have more than 10 includes? And is it talking about #include or include=> ? None of the .conf files included here have any include statements. [OffNet] ; lines removed [OnNet] ; lines removed include => OffNet [comp_wildwildwest] #include "inc/wildwildwest/features.conf" #include "inc/wildwildwest/blocked-outgoing.conf" #include "inc/wildwildwest/blocked-incoming.conf" [user_3250071] #include "inc/wildwildwest/3250071/features.con...

...m drilled down to a depth of 10. I'm thinking the error text is wrong. Maybe you can't have more than 10 includes? And is it talking about #include or include=> ? None of the .conf files included here have any include statements. > > >[OffNet] >; lines removed > >[OnNet] >; lines removed >include => OffNet > >[comp_wildwildwest] >#include "inc/wildwildwest/features.conf" >#include "inc/wildwildwest/blocked-outgoing.conf" >#include "inc/wildwildwest/blocked-incoming.conf" > >[user_3250071] >#i...

Hmmm. Ok, that's true. At the very least it will create confusing CDR's I think... maybe. We're not billing our OnNet traffic at all. Only the traffic that goes OffNet, to our switch is billed (if it leaves our switch that is...). I was thinking earlier too that we only need progressinband on traffic that goes to the PSTN, via our switch. OnNet traffic will never generate reorder tones and such. The docs say that...

...> ? driver = ldap > } > protocol lmtp { > ? mail_plugins = zlib quota acl sieve > } > protocol lda { > ? auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master > ? deliver_log_format = msgid=%m: %$ > ? mail_plugins = zlib quota acl sieve > ? postmaster_address = postmaster at onnet.ch <mailto:postmaster at onnet.ch> > } > protocol imap { > ? mail_plugins = zlib quota acl imap_quota imap_acl > } > protocol sieve { > ? info_log_path = /var/log/sieve.log > ? log_path = /var/log/sieve.log > ? mail_max_userip_connections = 10 > ? managesieve_implem...