Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "onlink".
Did you mean:
online
2003 Oct 29
4
dead onlink
...92.168.0.33
192.168.0.96/27 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.97
192.168.0.64/27 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.65
192.168.0.128/27 dev eth3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.129
127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
default
nexthop via 192.168.0.126 dev eth2 weight 1 dead onlink
nexthop via 192.168.0.61 dev eth0 weight 1
-----------------------------
Is normal the part of "dead onlink" ?
Is it balancing the load between both internet providers?
Sorry for my English. I''m from Argentine.
Thanks in advance.
______________________________________________...
2006 Nov 14
6
netmask 255.255.255.255 vs ip route add via ... (bug?)
Greetings routing folks,
I want to use the netmask 255.255.255.255 to insulate (not quite
isolate) machines on a shared subnet from each other. This works
just fine on win XP, but Linux iproute will not acccept the
gateway address in one step -- neither on the command line nor
via DHCP:
Here''s the interface, set up with a netmask of /32:
# ip addr
...
2: eth0:
2003 May 05
5
iproute2: gatewayed routes in ancillary tables
Hello all,
Tomas Bonnedahl and I recently corresponded about a rather odd behaviour
with routes in ancillary routing tables.
We both receive a "Network is unreachable" error when we try to add
gatewayed routes to ancillary tables and the main routing table does not
contain an entry for the gateway IP.
It seems that unless a route to the gateway IP exists in the main routing
table, I
2003 Jul 31
0
IPIP tunnels and TCP connections
...een the two linux boxes to give the
internal network access to the internet outside the metropolitan
network.
the setup on linux box 1:
ip tun add tun0 mode ipip ttl 64 local a.b.c.d remote x.y.z.v
ip addr add 172.16.0.1/32 dev tun0
ip link set tun0 up
ip ro add 172.16.0.2/32 via x.y.z.v dev tun0 onlink
Then :
table main contains no default route.
ip ru add pref 10 lookup main
ip ro add metro_dest via my_local_gateway dev extf table metro
... as many as needed
ip ru add pref 100 lookup metro
Up to here I have local directly connected networks and the metropolitan
network reachable
This is fo...
2006 Aug 14
14
Routing packets over multiple links (NICS) all on the same ISP all with same gateway.
Ok ive been trying to get this to work for about half a year now. Ive
searched all over the internet for a solution for
my problem. Ive found some solutions, but they only led me to yet more
problems.
What we want to do is the following:
I live in a student complex with 7 other people. Every room has its own
internet connection from the same ISP.
Ip, gateway, subnet are asigned through dhcp on
2007 Jan 13
5
multipath device round robin not working?
...metric 1
I enabled ip_forward and set arp_ignore to 1 for eth0 and eth1 to make
sure the correct nic answers to arp requests.
I tried to get the egress load balancing to work by replacing the above
two default routes with:
ip route add default mpath drr nexthop via 10.0.0.1 dev eth0 weight 1
onlink nexthop via 10.0.0.1 dev eth1 weight 1 onlink
I assumed that with mpath device round robin both nics would be used
more or less equally, but the reality is only one of the nics actually
works and the second nic even stops responding to arp requests.
Am I doing something totally wrong or impossi...
2001 Mar 15
12
Balancing ip traffic over two or more internet (adsl) connections
Hi.
I''ve got here the following configuration:
(turn on fixed pitch font to be able to see the scheme in a more
accurately way)
Client machines <-----> ADSL Router 1 <-----> INTERNET
(192.168.0.0/24) (192.168.0.229) NAT
Client machines <-----> ADSL Router 1 <-----> INTERNET
(192.168.1.0/24) (192.168.1.229) NAT
[if doesn''t really
2004 May 12
6
Multipath Connection problem on RH-8.0
...erver.org/~julian/nano.txt,
The problem is;
when i try to connect to Internet form gateway machine it;s success ,
but only one interface is active, no load balancing at all ,
This is my default table
#ip r ls table DEF
default proto static
nexthop via 172.16.0.1 dev eth0 weight 256 dead onlink pervasive
nexthop via 192.168.0.1 dev eth1 weight 1
I search the list about this error, and found that i shall use the
upgrade version of iproute2, and i compile that too.
but with same config, and new iproute2 i can''t connect to internet now.
please be advice, what wrong with my...
2023 Jan 18
1
DCs in multiple VLANs
I have 2 DCs at a customer that also run ISC-Kea-DHCP servers.
To be able to provide DHCP-Leases I added virtual interfaces to the
servers with IPs in each VLAN.
In turn there also exist routes to the VLANs:
# ip r
default via 10.0.0.254 dev enp0s31f6 onlink
10.0.0.0/24 dev enp0s31f6 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.230
10.100.40.0/24 dev enp0s31f6.200 proto kernel scope link src 10.100.40.230
192.168.101.0/24 dev enp0s31f6.101 proto kernel scope link src
192.168.101.230
192.168.102.0/24 dev enp0s31f6.102 proto kernel scope link src
192.168.102.230...
2007 Mar 11
0
Where is the returning connection?
...red are,
# A network
ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 src 192.168.1.2 table main
ip route add default via 192.168.1.1 table main
ip rule add from 192.168.1.2 table main
# B network
ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 dev eth1 src 192.168.2.2 table router
ip route add default via 192.168.2.1 dev eth1 onlink table router
ip rule add from 192.168.2.2 table router
And last, I''ve also tried to "-j MARK" those packets going to "--dport
10080" and add a rule like:
ip rule add fwmark <number> table router
But it didn''t work either.
Why the connection is not a...
2003 Feb 25
0
Shorewall Setup.
...d 00:00:00:00:00:00:00
9: ax0: <BROADCAST,UP> mtu 256 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 10
link/ax25 ac:8a:62:88:a4:8e:10 brd a2:a6:a8:40:40:40:60
inet 44.135.34.201/24 brd 44.135.34.255 scope global ax0
-------------- next part --------------
44.137.28.48 via 62.238.66.67 dev tunl0 proto static onlink
24.224.173.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 24.224.173.220
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1
127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
44.0.0.0/8 via 24.138.74.225 dev tunl0 proto static onlink
default via 24.224.173.1 dev eth0
-------------- next part -----...
2003 Jul 03
1
ipv6 dialup: "nd6_lookup: failed to lookup" problem (4.8-REL)
...lifetime: 1800
Reachable time: 30
Retrans time: 0
ICMPv6 options
Type: 5 (MTU)
Length: 8 bytes (1)
MTU: 1480
ICMPv6 options
Type: 3 (Prefix information)
Length: 32 bytes (4)
Prefix length: 64
Flags: 0xc0
1... .... = Onlink
.1.. .... = Auto
..0. .... = Not router address
...0 .... = Not site prefix
Valid lifetime: 0x00278d00
Preferred lifetime: 0x00093a80
Prefix: 3ffe:80ee:2ee:1300::
axxem.hide:~# ifconfig tun0
tun0: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MUL...
2003 Feb 27
3
Unknown commments in shorewall status.
...1
tcp 6 3 TIME_WAIT src=44.135.34.201 dst=44.135.85.30 sport=1557
dport=23 src=44.135.85.30 dst=44.135.34.201 sport=23 dport=1557 [ASSURED]
use=1
---
Ted Gervais
Coldbrook Nova Scotia
Canada B4R1A7
-------------- next part --------------
44.137.28.48 via 62.238.66.67 dev tunl0 proto static onlink
24.224.173.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 24.224.173.220
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1
127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
44.0.0.0/8 via 24.138.74.225 dev tunl0 proto static onlink
default via 24.224.173.1 dev eth0
-------------- next part -----...
2007 Feb 21
10
Split access, load balancing AND forwarding: HOW?
The LARTC howto correctly describes load balancing and split
access for traffic from a machine with multiple ISP connections
(http://www.lartc.org/lartc.html#LARTC.RPDB.MULTIPLE-LINKS) --
*provided* the traffic originates from the machine itself (i.e.
traffic regularly handled by the INPUT and OUTPUT chains of
iptables).
When forwarding traffic from an attached local network, the
following