search for: onece

...t ordering of factors fit1<-lme(y ~ visit*treat*gender, data=gdat, random = ~visit|id) anova(fit1) fit2<-lme(y ~ gender*treat*visit, data=gdat, random = ~visit|id) anova(fit2) # Result: identical (balanced design so far), ok # Now change gender of subject 1 gdat$gender[c(1,41,81,121)]<-2 # onece more fits with different ordering of factors fit1<-lme(y ~ visit*treat*gender, data=gdat, random = ~visit|id) anova(fit1) fit2<-lme(y ~ gender*treat*visit, data=gdat, random = ~visit|id) anova(fit2) # Result: There are differences!! Hope anybody can help or give me advice how to interpret th...

Am 25.11.2017 um 16:55 schrieb Achim Gottinger via samba: > > > Am 25.11.2017 um 04:39 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: >> On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 11:55 +1300, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >>> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 11:21 +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba wrote: >>>> Hello List, >>>> >>>> In preparation to update my samba ad-dc's running

On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 11:55 +1300, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 11:21 +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba wrote: > > Hello List, > > > > In preparation to update my samba ad-dc's running debian wheezy with > > backported samba 4.6.8 to 4.7.3. > > I'd like to fix two errors showing up in dbcheck whom hab been reported > > by

Am 25.11.2017 um 04:39 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 11:55 +1300, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 11:21 +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba wrote: >>> Hello List, >>> >>> In preparation to update my samba ad-dc's running debian wheezy with >>> backported samba 4.6.8 to 4.7.3. >>> I'd like to fix

...idays for one week. After return I found in >security mails from router (chkrootkit) following message: >Checking `lkm'... You have 1 process hidden for readdir command >You have 1 process hidden for ps command >Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed > >It apeared only onece. From previous and next days reports, the message is >not present. > >How could I be sure, the machine is not hacked ? > > [1] Make backups. tar(1), dump(8), doesn't matter. [2] Reinstall identical operating system on new equipment. [3] Restore backups into large partiti...

Hi, I have a 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD box apparently hacked! Yesterday I ran chkrootkit-0.41 and I don't like some of the outputs. Those are: chfn ... INFECTED chsh ... INFECTED date ... INFECTED ls ... INFECTED ps ... INFECTED But all the rest is NOT PROMISC, NOT INFECTED, NOTHING FOUND, NOTHING DELETED, or NOTHING DETECTED. I know by the FreeBSD-Security archives that

I'm trying (for the first time) to compile R-devel on my Windows2000 machine. I retrieved the most recent r-devel sources using rsync. I retrieved the R-tools and MinGW and made appropriate modifications to my path (I'm using cygwin): $ type make make is hashed (/c/netsrc/R-devel/tools/make) $ type gcc gcc is /c/mingw/bin/gcc $ type hhc.exe hhc.exe is /c/Program Files/HTML Help

Okay, here is the background. I have a PRI with 15 active channels on it. I originally setup all of them in group=1 and all outgoing and incoming calls used this group. The phone number that I have associated with these channels ends with 750 and that is how I direct the calls. i.e. In my extensions.conf I have: exten => 750,1,Dial(SIP/120,20) All this works fine. Now I have the need

Hi Andreas, First, thanks again for undertaking this work and submitting it back. There is a lot of good stuff here and it would be great to see it get back into the tree. I have a few major high-level comments on the patch. First off, the patch is quite large and should be broken down into separate incremental changes which are easier to review and apply. I think the patches should more or less

Hello all, A client of us, is thinking to migrate their actual PBX to a Cisco CallManager. We want to sell him an asterisk box to complement the Cisco PBX. I think to use asterisk as a Voicemail server (Replazing the Cisco Unity) Has asterisk all the functionalities to replace a CIsco Unity server? Which functionalities Cisco Unity has than asterisk could cover? How could asterisk complement the

Hi all, as proposed in http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-February/020396.html I implemented the algorithm presented in [Ball94]. It only instruments the minimal number of edges necessary for edge profiling. The main changes introduced by this patch are: *) a interface compatible rewrite of ProfileInfo *) a cleanup of ProfileInfoLoader (some functionality in ProfileInfoLoader

FULL backup to a file zfs snapshot -r rpool at 0908 zfs send -Rv rpool at 0908 > /net/remote/rpool/snaps/rpool.0908 INCREMENTAL backup to a file zfs snapshot -i rpool at 0908 rpool at 090822 zfs send -Rv rpool at 090822 > /net/remote/rpool/snaps/rpool.090822 As I understand the latter gives a file with changes between 0908 and 090822. Is this correct? How do I restore those files? I know

Hi Daniel, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > First, thanks again for undertaking this work and submitting it back. There is a > lot of good stuff here and it would be great to see it get back into the tree. Thanks for taking the time to review this, I know its a huge patch. I still have a few questions on how you would like this patch to be re-factored and split up. > [...]

...random = ~visit|id) > > anova(fit1) > > fit2<-lme(y ~ gender*treat*visit, data=gdat, random = ~visit|id) > > anova(fit2) > > # Result: identical (balanced design so far), ok > > # Now change gender of subject 1 > > gdat$gender[c(1,41,81,121)]<-2 > > # onece more fits with different ordering of factors > > fit1<-lme(y ~ visit*treat*gender, data=gdat, random = ~visit|id) > > anova(fit1) > > fit2<-lme(y ~ gender*treat*visit, data=gdat, random = ~visit|id) > > anova(fit2) > > # Result: There are differences!! > >...