search for: onec

...t ordering of factors fit1<-lme(y ~ visit*treat*gender, data=gdat, random = ~visit|id) anova(fit1) fit2<-lme(y ~ gender*treat*visit, data=gdat, random = ~visit|id) anova(fit2) # Result: identical (balanced design so far), ok # Now change gender of subject 1 gdat$gender[c(1,41,81,121)]<-2 # onece more fits with different ordering of factors fit1<-lme(y ~ visit*treat*gender, data=gdat, random = ~visit|id) anova(fit1) fit2<-lme(y ~ gender*treat*visit, data=gdat, random = ~visit|id) anova(fit2) # Result: There are differences!! Hope anybody can help or give me advice how to interpret t...

...kported. >>> >>> I hope this helps. >> These patches are now in master and I see metze already has a branch >> for 4.7 so I expect those to be backported soon. >> >> Andrew Bartlett > Thank you for the info's Andrew! > I already damaged the sam db onec trying to use ldb edit to remove > deleted objects, thats why asked if in this case an dbcheck --reindex > will fix it. > But since they cause no problems with 4.6 i read your replay as they > will not cause problems on 4.7 as well. So I'll try to update this > weekend and re...

On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 11:55 +1300, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 11:21 +0100, Achim Gottinger via samba wrote: > > Hello List, > > > > In preparation to update my samba ad-dc's running debian wheezy with > > backported samba 4.6.8 to 4.7.3. > > I'd like to fix two errors showing up in dbcheck whom hab been reported > > by

...w, >> which will then be backported. >> >> I hope this helps. > These patches are now in master and I see metze already has a branch > for 4.7 so I expect those to be backported soon. > > Andrew Bartlett Thank you for the info's Andrew! I already damaged the sam db onec trying to use ldb edit to remove deleted objects, thats why asked if in this case an dbcheck --reindex will fix it. But since they cause no problems with 4.6 i read your replay as they will not cause problems on 4.7 as well. So I'll try to update this weekend and report back. Achim~

...idays for one week. After return I found in >security mails from router (chkrootkit) following message: >Checking `lkm'... You have 1 process hidden for readdir command >You have 1 process hidden for ps command >Warning: Possible LKM Trojan installed > >It apeared only onece. From previous and next days reports, the message is >not present. > >How could I be sure, the machine is not hacked ? > > [1] Make backups. tar(1), dump(8), doesn't matter. [2] Reinstall identical operating system on new equipment. [3] Restore backups into large partit...

Hi, I have a 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD box apparently hacked! Yesterday I ran chkrootkit-0.41 and I don't like some of the outputs. Those are: chfn ... INFECTED chsh ... INFECTED date ... INFECTED ls ... INFECTED ps ... INFECTED But all the rest is NOT PROMISC, NOT INFECTED, NOTHING FOUND, NOTHING DELETED, or NOTHING DETECTED. I know by the FreeBSD-Security archives that

I'm trying (for the first time) to compile R-devel on my Windows2000 machine. I retrieved the most recent r-devel sources using rsync. I retrieved the R-tools and MinGW and made appropriate modifications to my path (I'm using cygwin): $ type make make is hashed (/c/netsrc/R-devel/tools/make) $ type gcc gcc is /c/mingw/bin/gcc $ type hhc.exe hhc.exe is /c/Program Files/HTML Help

Okay, here is the background. I have a PRI with 15 active channels on it. I originally setup all of them in group=1 and all outgoing and incoming calls used this group. The phone number that I have associated with these channels ends with 750 and that is how I direct the calls. i.e. In my extensions.conf I have: exten => 750,1,Dial(SIP/120,20) All this works fine. Now I have the need

...ctor<Constant*> Initializer = std::vector<Constant*>(NumEdges); This unnecessarily copies the vector, please use: std::vector<Constant*> Initializer(NumEdges); > + APInt zero(32,0); Constant* zeroc = ConstantInt::get(zero); > + APInt minusone(32,-1); Constant* minusonec = ConstantInt::get(minusone); Please use: > + Constant* zeroc = ConstantInt::get(llvm::Type::Int32Ty, 0); > + Constant* onec = ConstantInt::getSigned(llvm::Type::Int32Ty, -1); On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Andreas Neustifter<e0325716 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > Hi all, &...

Hello all, A client of us, is thinking to migrate their actual PBX to a Cisco CallManager. We want to sell him an asterisk box to complement the Cisco PBX. I think to use asterisk as a Voicemail server (Replazing the Cisco Unity) Has asterisk all the functionalities to replace a CIsco Unity server? Which functionalities Cisco Unity has than asterisk could cover? How could asterisk complement the

Hi all, as proposed in http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-February/020396.html I implemented the algorithm presented in [Ball94]. It only instruments the minimal number of edges necessary for edge profiling. The main changes introduced by this patch are: *) a interface compatible rewrite of ProfileInfo *) a cleanup of ProfileInfoLoader (some functionality in ProfileInfoLoader

FULL backup to a file zfs snapshot -r rpool at 0908 zfs send -Rv rpool at 0908 > /net/remote/rpool/snaps/rpool.0908 INCREMENTAL backup to a file zfs snapshot -i rpool at 0908 rpool at 090822 zfs send -Rv rpool at 090822 > /net/remote/rpool/snaps/rpool.090822 As I understand the latter gives a file with changes between 0908 and 090822. Is this correct? How do I restore those files? I know

...izer = std::vector<Constant*>(NumEdges); > > This unnecessarily copies the vector, please use: > std::vector<Constant*> Initializer(NumEdges); Okay. >> + APInt zero(32,0); Constant* zeroc = ConstantInt::get(zero); >> + APInt minusone(32,-1); Constant* minusonec = ConstantInt::get(minusone); > > Please use: >> + Constant* zeroc = ConstantInt::get(llvm::Type::Int32Ty, 0); >> + Constant* onec = ConstantInt::getSigned(llvm::Type::Int32Ty, -1); Okay. Thank you so much for taking the time and reviewing this giving me very valuable comments...

...have downloaded the ld98 > > program (version for windows) as indicated in the > > help page on ldBand. I did it, but obtained an > > error message "Error in (head + 1):length(w) : > > Argument NA/NaN" when I copied the help examples, > > so it seems that a conection between R and ld98 > > is not well performed in my computer. Did I put > > ld98.exe in the wrong place? If so, where should > > I put it? Thanks a lot in advance, > > > > > > Berta Iba?ez Beroiz > > Do you mean the Hmisc package? Do you mean the ld...