search for: omitframepointer

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "omitframepointer".

2009 May 08
2
[LLVMdev] Darwin option processing
...the testing I'd rather have on it before I did the flip. The other patch would look something like this: Index: Makefile.rules =================================================================== --- Makefile.rules (revision 71041) +++ Makefile.rules (working copy) @@ -245,6 +245,13 @@ OmitFramePointer := -fomit-frame-pointer endif endif + ifndef LOADABLE_MODULE + ifndef SHARED_LIBRARY + ifeq ($(OS),Darwin) + DynamicNoPic := -mdynamic-no-pic + endif + endif + endif # Darwin requires -fstrict-aliasing to be explicitly enabled. # Avoid -fstrict-aliasing on...
2009 May 08
0
[LLVMdev] Darwin option processing
On May 7, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > I'm toying with building with -mdynamic-no-pic, but for this to work, > the shared library bits in llvm can't be built with that flag. Hi Mike, If you're doing this for Clang's benefit, I think the best thing to do is to compile LLVM PIC (the default) and then build the clang front- end pieces with -mdynamic-no-pic. Does
2009 May 08
0
[LLVMdev] Darwin option processing
...) get stuck into dylibs. > The other patch would look something like this: > > Index: Makefile.rules > =================================================================== > --- Makefile.rules (revision 71041) > +++ Makefile.rules (working copy) > @@ -245,6 +245,13 @@ > OmitFramePointer := -fomit-frame-pointer > endif > endif > + ifndef LOADABLE_MODULE > + ifndef SHARED_LIBRARY > + ifeq ($(OS),Darwin) > + DynamicNoPic := -mdynamic-no-pic > + endif > + endif > + endif How about factoring the logic so that there is one PIC_S...
2009 May 08
2
[LLVMdev] Darwin option processing
I'm toying with building with -mdynamic-no-pic, but for this to work, the shared library bits in llvm can't be built with that flag. I've found that: Index: Makefile.rules =================================================================== --- Makefile.rules (revision 71041) +++ Makefile.rules (working copy) @@ -472,6 +476,9 @@ ifneq ($(DARWIN_MAJVERS),4) LD.Flags += $(RPATH)
2013 Apr 02
0
flac 1.3.0pre3 pre-release
...ludeDirectories="." + AdditionalIncludeDirectories=".;..\..\..\include" PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE;DEBUG" MinimalRebuild="true" BasicRuntimeChecks="3" @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ FavorSizeOrSpeed="1" OmitFramePointers="true" WholeProgramOptimization="true" - AdditionalIncludeDirectories="." + AdditionalIncludeDirectories=".;..\..\..\include" PreprocessorDefinitions="WIN32;NDEBUG;_CONSOLE" RuntimeLibrary="0" BufferSecurityCheck...
2016 Jul 15
3
[PATCH 1/4] Create a simple project to create version.h to run before any other
Avoids trying to create and replace version.h more than once which led to file-locking errors with multicore builds. --- Makefile.am | 1 + win32/VS2015/celt.vcxproj | 48 +++++++++++++++++--------- win32/VS2015/generate_version.vcxproj | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ win32/VS2015/opus.sln | 32 ++++++++++++++++-
2013 Apr 01
2
flac 1.3.0pre3 pre-release
Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: > Zip with random patches: > > flac_mac: fixes some missing parameters from safe string handling > changes in flac_mac's main.c > flac_mac_project: adds flac's include dir for the project so new > functions can be found > progress_display: flac testing progress display used old functions that > didn't get utf-8 decoding >
2005 May 19
3
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] llvm 'make install' build errors
Reid, I think it is the first time it is run that the errors occcur !? Not sure but that would seem logical. Aaron