search for: omiss

The Hardware Compatibility List page on our website said to report any omissions in the list to this address. I bought a CyberPower UPS Model *LX1500GU*. It looks similar to the *CP1500AVRLCD*. My intention is to configure it in FreeNAS (FreeBSD). The FreeNAS user guide says it uses NUT to provide UPS support an contains a link to your website for a list of drivers of su...

Dear R developers, I am wondering if this should raise an error or a warning. > sprintf('%.f, %.f', 1, 2, 3) [1] "1, 2" I am aware that R has ?numbered? sprintf arguments (sprintf('%1$.f', ?), and in that case, omissing of specific arguments may be intended. But in the usual syntax, omission of an argument is probably a mistake. Thank you for your consideration. Best wishes, Matthias [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear Tomas,Thank you.Regarding the "unnumbered" arguments, i.e. sprintf('%f %f', 1, 2, 3). This was the case I wanted to report, here a warning can be very useful.Regarding the "numbered" arguments, that is, sprintf('%$1f %$3f', 1, 2, 3). Here, omission of an argument might be intended, for example, in an application with support for multiple languages. Therefore, I am wondering if a warning should be raised.Regarding the mixture: never heard that this works, and I would probably not want to use it...Your work is much appreciated, thanks again....

.... (c) Found: 'clusterApply' calls 'fun' on the first node with arguments 'seq[[1]]' and 'clusterApply' has no 'seq' arg. There are a few other occurences of mistake (c) in the \details and \value section, for clusterApply() and clusterApplyLB(). Omissions --------- o X: A vector (atomic or list) for ?parLapply? and ?parSapply?, an array for ?parApply?. ==> Nothing is said for the 'X' argument of parLapplyLB() and parSapplyLB(). Inconsistencies --------------- The only function in that man page with a '...

On Sep 5, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Bruce Korb wrote: > Hi, > > I do not really have much direct control over the compile lines any > more. > I guess I could code up a wrapper for your wrapper so that the > libtool wrapper > would be happy, but could you all consider libtool built projects and > embed the necessary option stripping in your clang-cc thing? > Thank you. >

On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:09 PM, Jason Berg <jbswman at gmail.com> wrote: > I am happy to provide you the output of "upsc" but I do not know what that is. "Does it mean UPS console"? Basically - "UPS client" was the original author's intent, I think. https://doc.freenas.org/9.3/freenas_services.html#ups says that you can run it from Shell, which I assume

I''ve discovered that most of the documentation changes were omitted from the released 1.4.3 tarball and RPM. The updated documentation is available now on Sourceforge and will be available on the other mirrors shortly. In a few days, I''ll release 1.4.3a with the updated documentation but I want to wait to be sure that there are no other problem fixes that need to be included

Requests first: after a build, "make" always remakes all the .out files; maybe we could add a few dependencies there? And could we possibly have a few more '@if' lines in the Makefile to quiet it down? These should be obvious: --- #readpass.c Fri Apr 20 13:17:39 2001 +++ readpass.c Fri Apr 20 13:37:26 2001 @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ #include "ssh.h" char *

[Not subscribed to this list, so please respond directly if you need to speak to me] In man5/sshd_config.5, a permissible keyword in a 'Match' block is missing. It currently lists only: AllowTcpForwarding, Banner, ForceCommand, GatewayPorts, GSSApiAuthentication, KbdInteractiveAuthentication, KerberosAuthentication, PasswordAuthentication, PermitOpen, PermitRootLogin,

"lpt1" through "lpt9" and "com1" through "com9" are in fact "special" file names under various versions of Microsoft Windows. However, "R Extensions" says only that "lpt1" through "lpt4" and "com1" through "com3" cannot be used as filenames, and "R CMD check" checks for just these

The help file for "[<-" (and "[[<-" doesn't contain those functions in it's usage section ( .../src/library/base/man/Extract.Rd ). Although that file lists "[<-" and "[[<-" as aliases, it doesn't document them in a formal manner (consequently, the "value" argument is not described in the "arguments" section.)

Looks like I have skipped on this, but still - a couple of questions: 1) Why there suddenly is an OrderedHash in ActiveSupport? (this glaring omission from ruby core is present in many apps already) 2) Why it doesn''t match the semantics of Hash respectively? 3) Why it''s #nodoc ? -- Julian ''Julik'' Tarkhanov please send all personal mail to me at julik.nl

Dear all, I noticed the following under R 1.8.1 (when nls was still a separate package) but the same problem occurs under R 1.9.0 (where most (all?) of nls is now in the stats package): > data(Puromycin) > fm <- nls(rate~SSmicmen(conc,b0,b1), Puromycin, subset = state=="treated") > coef(summary(fm)) NULL The problem seems to be that summary.nls uses the name

[retrying send with different email source] Hi, I do not really have much direct control over the compile lines any more. I guess I could code up a wrapper for your wrapper so that the libtool wrapper would be happy, but could you all consider libtool built projects and embed the necessary option stripping in your clang-cc thing? Thank you. Regards, Bruce make[2]: Entering directory

...s): case ISD::SRA: Results.push_back(ExpandIntLibCall(Node, false, RTLIB::SRA_I16, RTLIB::SRA_I16, RTLIB::SRA_I32, RTLIB::SRA_I64, RTLIB::SRA_I128)); I think this is a BUG by omission of necessary switch cases. Similarly, the following ISD codes ISD::CTTZ, ISD::CTLZ, ISD::CTPOP do not define any Library calls, despite LLVM being able to fully expand them into rather large code for targets that do not natively implement them. I regard this also as an omission/bug, because...

It did not convert over some things: protocol imap { listen = *:143 mail_plugins = quota imap_quota imap_client_workarounds = outlook-idle ssl_listen = *:993 } protocol pop3 { pop3_uidl_format = %f mail_plugins = quota pop3_client_workarounds = outlook-no-nuls oe-ns-eoh } protocol lda { mail_plugins = quota cmusieve

Me? I would modify the first sentence from: > When writing the body of an if, else, or loop statement, > omit the braces to avoid unnecessary line noise. However, > braces should be used in cases where the omission of braces > harm the readability and maintainability of the code. To be: > Braces are optional around the body of an if, else, or loop statement, > except in cases where the omission of braces harm the readability and > maintainability of the code. Followed by the rest of the sect...

In the following: plot(0:1, 0:1) legend(x=0, y=1.2, pch=c(1,2), legend=c("May","June")) the first plot character is omitted when plotting to the screen. I obtained the same behaviour when placing a legend in the margin following use of pairs() -please do not edit the information below-- Version: platform = i386-pc-mingw32 arch = x86 os = Win32 system = x86, Win32

Hello again, I am simply trying to import a rectangular table of strings. The table's dimensions are 1990 x 2, yet my read.table() command can only find 362 of the rows (and they're not the first 362). I would've taken the time to figure out how to use scan, readLines, or some other tool that can read in character strings, and then parse and input to a table, but that seems like

...s implemented now. Incidentally, the CTLZ… implementation is IDENTICAL to what I am proposing for the Shifts. This is not just adding support for “out-of-tree-targets”, but giving consistency to the fact that we have perfectly defined LibCalls for Shifts, but they can’t be used because there’s an omission in the sources. I only proposed to add a missing case statement to the ConvertNodeToLibCall. To my understanding this is totally harmless to any existing or future targets because all what it does is to call the Library function when setOperationAction is set to “LibCall”. This is not differen...