Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "omelett".
Did you mean:
omelette
2006 May 12
3
The conclusion regarding resume patch
Dear folks,
To me suspend and resume is not a fancy feature. It is
a must have like all the other conveniences and
simplicity that scp provides.
I agree with Damien that this will cause multiple
protocol versions to float around, but we can't make
omelettes without breaking eggs.
The question is how important is this feature?
I would say it is very basic compared to other fancy
features like multiple simultaneous file transfers and
all that.
To argue Damien's point again, we can have a protocol
check in the beginning the way we have to chec...
2014 Jul 17
0
possible bug around ACL
...ker process serving
particular connection.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
acl_mailbox_right_lookup (box=0x7fd75e4e1dc0, right_idx=right_idx at entry=10) at acl-mailbox.c:40
40 if (abox->skip_acl_checks)
(gdb) p abox
$1 = (struct acl_mailbox *) 0x0
(gdb)
# uname -a
Linux omelette 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.57-3 x86_64 GNU/Linux
ii dovecot-core 1:2.2.13-2 amd64
local build from sources in testing just disabled lucene
ps. I am idling on #dovecot too, if any info is needed with faster round
trip time than emails.
best regards
--
agaran at pld...
2009 Feb 23
3
Recommended wireless card (or is there a chance to get either iwi or ath fixed)?
Hi,
after some time without FreeBSD I installed 7.1 on an IBM Thinkpad T30
(with ZFS root on encrypted geli, works great).
Config is:
FreeBSD hasking.alashan.nongo 7.1-STABLE FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #3: Thu
Feb 5 21:10:45 CET 2009
root@hasking.alashan.nongo:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HASKING i386
I tried using my ath based D-Link DWL G650, which still seems to have
some issues in regard to interrupt
2023 Oct 27
1
release?
Hello, fellow NUTs!
This October proved to be a rather productive month, with several
developments wrapped up, as well as some issues with master codebase
behavior created, reported, fixed and tested :)
While we were not part of some official Hacktoberfest this year, it
pretty much felt like one - great thanks to everyone involved!
The month is also ending soon, so if we're to follow
2023 Oct 27
1
release?
Hello, fellow NUTs!
This October proved to be a rather productive month, with several
developments wrapped up, as well as some issues with master codebase
behavior created, reported, fixed and tested :)
While we were not part of some official Hacktoberfest this year, it
pretty much felt like one - great thanks to everyone involved!
The month is also ending soon, so if we're to follow
2023 Oct 02
1
release?
Seconding ... or firsting, considering the recent call to testing hidden
somewhere in a recent mail post ;) Currently I'm aiming at cutting a NUT
2.8.1 release during October.
As a bit of self-imposed retrospective:
I did hope for a faster (quarterly or so) cadence when I made the 2.8.0
release, but then a few issues came up as regressions of 2.8.0 and it
became a sort of crusade to fix
2023 Oct 02
1
release?
Seconding ... or firsting, considering the recent call to testing hidden
somewhere in a recent mail post ;) Currently I'm aiming at cutting a NUT
2.8.1 release during October.
As a bit of self-imposed retrospective:
I did hope for a faster (quarterly or so) cadence when I made the 2.8.0
release, but then a few issues came up as regressions of 2.8.0 and it
became a sort of crusade to fix
2008 Dec 26
1
starting values update
...> Yes I know that multi-level modeling as well as regression can be done in
a
> purely Bayesian way. However, I am not capable of Bayesian statistics,
> therefor I ask that question. I am starting to learn it a little bit.
No offense, but it sounds to me like you want to have the Bayesian
omelette without breaking the Bayesian eggs ;). Certain kinds of
multi-level models are mathematically identical to certain kinds of
Empirical Bayes models, but that does not make them Bayesian (despite
what some people say). I caution against your implied goal of
obtaining Bayesian statistics without pe...