search for: omap3530

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "omap3530".

Did you mean: omap2430
2009 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] Arm port
...but it may not matter, depending > on what you're trying to do with it. > > If you are able to try out LLVM for ARM, we would welcome your > feedback and contributions! Certainly, I'll test it out. In fact, I think now, that I do have a Nokia N800, and it runs the same TI OMAP3530 (I think, but I'm going to have to go doublecheck that) so I might well be able to test immediately. Tell you what: beginning immediately, I'll start reading all of the documents I can find at your site, so I'm not quite so dumb at it. I haven't seen that the code was up for downl...
2009 May 20
1
[LLVMdev] Arm port
...ndora is cheapest. I will say, without reservation, that the BeagleBoard is the goddamndest best single board computer that I've EVER seen, and I've put together a pretty large set of them, for one communications company or another. It's just my opinion, but I think that covering that OMAP3530 is really important, cause you're covering a pretty darn big slice of homebrew enthusiasts, as opposed to people who'd let their computers end up as doorstops. Besides, I've already bought the Pandora, it's kinda late to change my mind. It hasn't arrived here yet, though, and...
2009 May 20
0
[LLVMdev] Arm port
...pending >> on what you're trying to do with it. >> >> If you are able to try out LLVM for ARM, we would welcome your >> feedback and contributions! > > Certainly, I'll test it out.  In fact, I think now, that I do have a Nokia N800, > and it runs the same TI OMAP3530 (I think, but I'm going to have to go > doublecheck that) so I might well be able to test immediately. > > Tell you what: beginning immediately, I'll start reading all of the documents I > can find at your site, so I'm not quite so dumb at it.  I haven't seen that the &g...
2009 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] Arm port
...goals. Parts of this is replying to Christophe, part to Samuel, and part to Sandeep, I decided that writing 3 different replies would have been too much like pestering. Reply to any part you feel like, it all is about (ultimately) my wanting to use the llvm to support moving FreeBSD to run on the OMAP3530 as shown on the Pandora or maybe the BeagleBoard. ------------------------------------------------------ Well, seeing as studying the Cortex code until my Pandora shows up seems like time well spent, I'm going to be studying the llvm project as mush as I'm capable of. I don't know if...
2009 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] Arm port
If this is the wrong list, please correct me, thanks. I'm trying to get a bit more information about the Arm backend for llvm. The precise processor I'm interested in is the TI OMAP3530 (the Cortex-A8 is the main CPU, along with other processors onboard the chip). I did see that the backend for Arm has support for the V6, but I'm thinking (I could be wrong) that the Cortex-A8 is more V7 compatible. So, I was wondering if the LLVM would be available to me for my project, and...
2009 May 21
2
[LLVMdev] Arm port
Hi, - Cortex-A8 needs a specific instruction scheduler as dual issue forces you to interleave some instructions to allow to run two instructions in the same cycle for the best performance (Cortex-A9 is out-of-order so dual issue is not an issue (!) for performance). - Cortex-A8/A9 have several useful new instructions : for instance, bit operations like bitfield insertion/extraction or having
2009 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] Arm port
...plying to Christophe, part to Samuel, and part to Sandeep, I >> decided that writing 3 different replies would have been too much like >> pestering. Reply to any part you feel like, it all is about (ultimately) my >> wanting to use the llvm to support moving FreeBSD to run on the OMAP3530 as >> shown on the Pandora or maybe the BeagleBoard. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Well, seeing as studying the Cortex code until my Pandora shows up seems like >> time well spent, I'm going to be studying the llvm project...
2009 May 21
6
[LLVMdev] Arm port
...f this is replying to Christophe, part to Samuel, and part to Sandeep, I > decided that writing 3 different replies would have been too much like > pestering.  Reply to any part you feel like, it all is about (ultimately) my > wanting to use the llvm to support moving FreeBSD to run on the OMAP3530 as > shown on the Pandora or maybe the BeagleBoard. > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Well, seeing as studying the Cortex code until my Pandora shows up seems like > time well spent, I'm going to be studying the llvm project as mush as I'm >...
2009 May 20
0
[LLVMdev] Arm port
On May 20, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: > Hmm. Well, my motivation is that I recently bought a Pandora (it > has the > Cortex-A8). It's not going to arrive here for a couple more months, > I think. > When it does finally arrive, I want to be able to immediately begin > work on > replacing the Linux that comes pre-installed with FreeBSD-arm. Hi Chuck,
2009 May 20
0
[LLVMdev] Arm port
...on? deep On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> wrote: > If this is the wrong list, please correct me, thanks. > > I'm trying to get a bit more information about the Arm backend for llvm.  The > precise processor I'm interested in is the TI OMAP3530 (the Cortex-A8 is the > main CPU, along with other processors onboard the chip).  I did see that the > backend for Arm has support for the V6, but I'm thinking (I could be wrong) that > the Cortex-A8 is more V7 compatible.  So, I was wondering if the LLVM would be > available to me...
2009 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] Arm port
Sandeep Patel wrote: > I am currently working on support for the Cortex-A9, but as all > compiler testing is more easily done on an Cortex-A8 today, A8 support > is implicit. > > What specific ISA changes are you most interested in? Are you able to > develop patches if we coordinate which areas to work on? Hmm. Well, my motivation is that I recently bought a Pandora (it has
2009 Feb 27
11
building a phone
Hi folks A common wisdom here is that one should use a proper hardware phone rather that an extra software on the user's PC. Why is that such a big issue? One thing that bothers me with the current crop of hardware SIP phones is that they are hopelessly properitary. So what would it take to build a fully-adaptable phone? Here are some of my thoughts. This is not anything I plan to do soon