search for: olv

Hi, > On Jul 7, 2020, at 18:37, Stefanos Baziotis via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > Ah, that's important information I didn't have. Thank you! > > No problem, glad to help! > > To the rest of your thoughts, I certainly agree. One interesting question is why LAA > didn't use DA at all. Other than that, note that LAA is quite

Patch 1 adds a check for the compilers visibility macro to configure.ac. Patch 2 avoids redefined symbol errors in clang of the tls entry points. Based on a suggestion from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> in http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19778. Tested with gcc 4.9 and clang 3.6(rc) Marc Dietrich (2): configure: add visibility macro detection to configure

...I$(top_builddir)/src/mapi > > include Makefile.sources > diff --git a/src/mapi/entry_x86-64_tls.h b/src/mapi/entry_x86-64_tls.h > index 71e9d60..2c5d64d 100644 > --- a/src/mapi/entry_x86-64_tls.h > +++ b/src/mapi/entry_x86-64_tls.h > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > * Chia-I Wu <olv at lunarg.com> > */ > > +#include "macros.h" > #include "u_macros.h" > > __asm__(".text\n" > @@ -62,8 +63,7 @@ entry_patch_public(void) > { > } > > -static char > -x86_64_entry_start[]; > +extern const char HIDDEN x86_64_...

I have successfully installed coda in R, and I am also able to read output from a Bugs run into coda. When I try to plots from CODA Output Analysis Menu, I do however _get_ problems: CODA Output Analysis Menu ************************* 1:Plots 2:Statistics 3:List/Change Options 4:Return to Main Menu Selection: 1 Error: "missing" illegal use of missing Quitting CODA.... Do you

Hello, I''ve just installed Ruby, Facter and Puppet from source (versions listed below) and am getting the following error, when trying to run Puppet 2.6.3: [root@localhost puppet]# ruby --version ruby 1.9.2p0 (2010-08-18 revision 29036) [i686-linux] [root@localhost puppet]# ruby -ropenssl -e "puts :installed" installed [root@localhost puppet]# ruby -rxmlrpc/client -e "puts

...ly seems. But yet they are intimately related in that the kind of information you want to know statically and dynamically is the same. I wonder what it would take to extend DA to generate runtime checks if it can't prove independence. The thing I fear is one or the other being enhanced to resolve more things statically without the other getting the same improvements. Then some passes benefit and others don't and it won't be clear why. The same could happen with enhancement to dynamic checking (if it were added to DA). -David