search for: olmar

...equires a significant amount of semantic analysis just to get > parsing correct. You could surely save a lot of time reinventing the wheel by reusing an existing C++ parser, like Elsa: http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~smcpeak/elkhound/ There are even OCaml bindings: http://www.cs.ru.nl/~tews/olmar/ These libraries were discussed on the OCaml mailing list recently: http://groups.google.com/group/fa.caml/msg/dd7dad5533647220 -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Argiris Kirtzidis wrote: > I'd like to hear your opinions and ideas for a proposal to improve > support for C++ parsing for LLVM's clang front end. Some meta feedback: C++ support in clang is a huge project, far and away more than any mortal can get done in a summer. While it would be possible to sketch out the parser itself in the summer (providing the

Hi all, I'd like to hear your opinions and ideas for a proposal to improve support for C++ parsing for LLVM's clang front end. Goal: Improve clang's C++ support. The scope of the project will be limited to C++ parsing, not code generation (I think the timeframe of a GSoC project and the complexity of C++ doesn't allow full C++ support to be developed). C++ parsing support