search for: oldold

...--> .LOCAL > ... > > Another thing that comes to my mind is that the 2008R2 domain was > upgraded from an initial Win2000. > Win2000-->Samba direct migration is not possible because Samba > requires at least a Win2003 domain. > So the complete upgrade was Win2000 (SRVAD-OLDOLD) --> Win2008R2 > (SRVAD-OLD) --> Domain/forest functional level upgrade --> Samba > 4.7.4 migration. > > Could there be something wrong/unexpected in current Win2008R2 domain > config? > It seems not to me because Windows client machines work ok and the > domain se...

On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 16:15:43 +0100 Claudio Nicora <claudio.nicora at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Is bind9 running during the join ? > > How have you set up bind ? > No it's not. > Following the doc here > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End > I see than the needed files (like /var/lib/samba/private/named.conf > and

...AMDOM mydomain --> samdom .EXT --> .LOCAL ... Another thing that comes to my mind is that the 2008R2 domain was upgraded from an initial Win2000. Win2000-->Samba direct migration is not possible because Samba requires at least a Win2003 domain. So the complete upgrade was Win2000 (SRVAD-OLDOLD) --> Win2008R2 (SRVAD-OLD) --> Domain/forest functional level upgrade --> Samba 4.7.4 migration. Could there be something wrong/unexpected in current Win2008R2 domain config? It seems not to me because Windows client machines work ok and the domain seems to function properly. Claudio...

...n2008R2 upgraded domain AD. > Another thing that comes to my mind is that the 2008R2 domain was > upgraded from an initial Win2000. > Win2000-->Samba direct migration is not possible because Samba > requires at least a Win2003 domain. > So the complete upgrade was Win2000 (SRVAD-OLDOLD) --> Win2008R2 > (SRVAD-OLD) --> Domain/forest functional level upgrade --> Samba > 4.7.4 migration. > > Could there be something wrong/unexpected in current Win2008R2 domain > config? Could you suggest something to check for? Even with -d9 there's nothing interesting...

...r thing that comes to my mind is that the 2008R2 domain was > > > upgraded from an initial Win2000. > > > Win2000-->Samba direct migration is not possible because Samba > > > requires at least a Win2003 domain. > > > So the complete upgrade was Win2000 (SRVAD-OLDOLD) --> Win2008R2 > > > (SRVAD-OLD) --> Domain/forest functional level upgrade --> Samba > > > 4.7.4 migration. > > > > > > Could there be something wrong/unexpected in current Win2008R2 > > > domain config? > > > > Could you suggest...

...r thing that comes to my mind is that the 2008R2 domain was > > > upgraded from an initial Win2000. > > > Win2000-->Samba direct migration is not possible because Samba > > > requires at least a Win2003 domain. > > > So the complete upgrade was Win2000 (SRVAD-OLDOLD) --> Win2008R2 > > > (SRVAD-OLD) --> Domain/forest functional level upgrade --> Samba > > > 4.7.4 migration. > > > > > > Could there be something wrong/unexpected in current Win2008R2 > > > domain config? > > > > Could you suggest...

...t; > > Another thing that comes to my mind is that the 2008R2 domain was > > upgraded from an initial Win2000. > > Win2000-->Samba direct migration is not possible because Samba > > requires at least a Win2003 domain. > > So the complete upgrade was Win2000 (SRVAD-OLDOLD) --> Win2008R2 > > (SRVAD-OLD) --> Domain/forest functional level upgrade --> Samba > > 4.7.4 migration. > > > > Could there be something wrong/unexpected in current Win2008R2 > > domain config? > > Could you suggest something to check for? > Even w...