search for: oldnews

...usleep(). recent rsync 3.1.3 is still using usleep: # grep -r usleep * config.h.in:/* Define to 1 if you have the `usleep' function. */ configure.ac: initgroups utimensat posix_fallocate attropen setvbuf usleep) configure.sh: initgroups utimensat posix_fallocate attropen setvbuf usleep OLDNEWS: - Use usleep() for our msleep() function if it is available. util2.c: usleep(t*1000); for my curiosity, that went into rsync @2014, which is not too long ago: https://git.samba.org/rsync.git/?p=rsync.git;a=commit;h=5546dab32970955e77ef7a5886bcd8fb765a25bf http://man7.org/linux/man-page...

I am having a bit of a problem with rsync 2.6.2 on AIX and I was wondering if this might just be the expected behavior. When using the -o and -g flags, the user and group names are NOT preserved on the receiving side, however, the UIDs/GIDs are preserved. I checked the OLDNEWS file and bugzilla, but could not find any reference to a problem like this. Vitals: -rsync 2.6.2 with security patch (pre 2.6.3) -Using rsync daemon, uid=root -Both sides are AIX 5.2 ML3/4 -- Aaron W Morris (decep) <aaronwmorris@gmail.com>

Hi, Thanks for the reply. I guess RHEL choose v2.2.10 <http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2013-December/000268.html> as it is a good release with all the things working. My source of confusion are from 1) http://dovecot.org/oldnews.html I have gone through each release update news. Lots of work and bug fix after v2.2.10 <http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2013-December/000268.html>, got me confused. E.g. in v2.2.13 has a fix " copied below" <http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.13.tar.gz>...

...oumitri at iitk.ac.in wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the reply. I guess RHEL choose v2.2.10 <http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2013-December/000268.html> as it is a good release with all the things working. > > My source of confusion are from > 1) http://dovecot.org/oldnews.html <http://dovecot.org/oldnews.html> > I have gone through each release update news. Lots of work and bug fix after v2.2.10 <http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2013-December/000268.html>, got me confused. > E.g. in v2.2.13 has a fix " copied below" > <http://...

Hello, I have a new data set and an old data set. Both have the same columns representing the same sort of measure. Within each data set (old and new) are 18 groups (simplified to three groups below). Within each group are individuals with unique ID numbers. These ID numbers may be the same as other ID numbers in different groups, but a particular ID number only appears once in each group. The

...t in the NEWS in future. In the meantime I think it's best just to say "lots of people". rsync is still licensed under the GPL, or to be pedantic "the GNU GPL". Rather than shipping cvs.log, which as you note is not up to date, I would suggest you just ship the NEWS and OLDNEWS files, which describe user-visible changes. If people want the nasty details there's always cvs.samba.org. At the moment the detailed CVS logs are not published. I guess we could change this but I don't really see the need to bloat the package. (Personally I think it counts as bloat for...

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha1.tar.gz.sig This is the first alpha release of Dovecot v1.1. I hope that it stabilizes into final release within a few months. There are a lot of new features since v1.0. The most important ones are listed at the end of this post. This is the only v1.1.alpha announcement I send

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha1.tar.gz.sig This is the first alpha release of Dovecot v1.1. I hope that it stabilizes into final release within a few months. There are a lot of new features since v1.0. The most important ones are listed at the end of this post. This is the only v1.1.alpha announcement I send

Hi all, is possible to know what version is executed on one server? Tnx -- Ciao Pirla Per rispondere in E-mail the (punto) pirla (chiocciola) flashnet.it *** un bacio ai pupi *** ---> Linux user since yesterday <--- ---> Linux User #389536 <---

Greetings, We are upgrading systems in our lab from rhel4 to rhel5. We've noticed a number of differences in behavior while using the same arguments on the same data set. We get different sent and received counts. We also had one case with some data corruption that was only fixed after telling rsync to checksum everything. I was hoping someone in the list can point me to some better

Is this Howto http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/DovecotLDAPostfixAdminMySQL actual also for Dovecot 2.x ? Cause i read Dovecot 1.x in the Howto Thank you for any hints / tipps Marko (from cold Hamburg Harbour)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11651 Bug ID: 11651 Summary: Can we allow --inplace and --sparse to coexist when --whole-file is in play? Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

Hi, I found a behaviour of rsync I cannot explain. 1) rsync -vaS --delete-after --include-from=/etc/rsync.inc --exclude-from=/etc/rsync.ex / server:/ 2) rsync -vaS --relative --delete-after --include-from=/etc/rsync.inc --exclude-from=/etc/rsync.ex / server:/ I sync most of one server to another as a fallback server. I had the relative option first (dont know anymore why), then

Dear List, Currently, I'm trying to implement a new feature to rsync. Delta back: Well, it simply just backups diff blocks, and the program is able to restore to any backup points. Current problem met for adding files! But I met a newbie problem here. I'm going to add six files, which are diff.h/diff.c del.h/del.c and merge.h/merge.c. I have modified Makefile.in. When I add an

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3844 Summary: --delete with --dry-run no longer reports files to be deleted Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Hi All, We are using rsync version 2.6.3 protocol version 28. Is there a way we could transfer files and force rsync not to look for the same user:group as host on the destination? Thanks in Advance -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ignore-Owner-and-group-at-destination-tp17279218p17279218.html Sent from the Samba - rsync mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3415 Summary: -R and --delete cause --delete to be ignored Product: rsync Version: 2.6.6 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: dietmar@zlabinger.at

Hello rsync list, I am running a Solaris 8 system and have rsync 1.6.2 protocal 14 installed. We have updated (wed 17-dec) to the latest Solaris 8 recommended patch set. When performing an rsync of two local UFS partitions rsync "hung", never completed, didn't exit. What I forced an exit via kill signal core dumped. Config of disks is that 1) Mirror by Solistice Disksuite rsync to

Hi all: I am trying to transfer a file from a machine A to a machine B. I ran a rsync deamon on machine B at a given port. Because there is a firewall between these two machines, I opened the port on the firewall. Is this enough to get rsync work through firewall? When I tried the transfer, I got the following error messages. my command: rsync -a --copy-links localfile rsync:://me@<my

I''m running 2.6.6 on a red hat EL3 system. using the following command, rsync -rlptDvzL --stats --include=a/ --include=a/dir/ --include=a/dir/symlink/ --include=a/dir/symlink/dir2/ --include=a/dir/symlink/dir2/dir3/ --exclude=''**'' /export/stuff remote::stuff I expect the "symlink" (which is really a symbolic link to a directory) to be preserved on the