Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "oldmode".
Did you mean:
old_mode
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 2/12] ldt-accessors
...====================================================
--- linux-2.6.13.orig/arch/i386/kernel/ldt.c 2005-08-08 13:50:20.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/kernel/ldt.c 2005-08-08 13:53:28.000000000 -0700
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@
static int write_ldt(void __user * ptr, unsigned long bytecount, int oldmode)
{
struct mm_struct * mm = current->mm;
- __u32 entry_1, entry_2, *lp;
+ __u32 entry_1, entry_2;
int error;
struct user_desc ldt_info;
@@ -205,8 +205,6 @@
goto out_unlock;
}
- lp = (__u32 *) ((ldt_info.entry_number << 3) + (char *) mm->context.ldt);
-
/* Allow LDTs...
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 2/12] ldt-accessors
...====================================================
--- linux-2.6.13.orig/arch/i386/kernel/ldt.c 2005-08-08 13:50:20.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/kernel/ldt.c 2005-08-08 13:53:28.000000000 -0700
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@
static int write_ldt(void __user * ptr, unsigned long bytecount, int oldmode)
{
struct mm_struct * mm = current->mm;
- __u32 entry_1, entry_2, *lp;
+ __u32 entry_1, entry_2;
int error;
struct user_desc ldt_info;
@@ -205,8 +205,6 @@
goto out_unlock;
}
- lp = (__u32 *) ((ldt_info.entry_number << 3) + (char *) mm->context.ldt);
-
/* Allow LDTs...
2010 Aug 05
0
[PATCH] drmmode: Add backlight support
...path);
+ drmmode_output->backlight_max = drmmode_backlight_get_max(output);
+ drmmode_output->backlight_active_level = drmmode_backlight_get(output);
+ return;
+ }
+ drmmode_output->backlight_iface = NULL;
+}
+
+static void
+drmmode_output_dpms_backlight(xf86OutputPtr output, int oldmode, int mode)
+{
+ drmmode_output_private_ptr drmmode_output = output->driver_private;
+
+ if (!drmmode_output->backlight_iface)
+ return;
+
+ if (mode == DPMSModeOn) {
+ /* If we're going from off->on we may need to turn on the
+ * backlight. */
+ if (oldmode != DPMSMo...
2007 Dec 06
51
[PATCH 0/19] desc_struct integration
Hi,
this is a series of patches that unify the struct desc_struct and friends
across x86_64 and i386. As usual, it provides paravirt capabilities as a
side-effect for x86_64.
I consider the main goal, namely, of unifying the desc_struct, an ongoing
effort, being this the beginning. A lot of old code has to be touched to
accomplish that.
I don't consider this patch ready for inclusion.
2007 Dec 06
51
[PATCH 0/19] desc_struct integration
Hi,
this is a series of patches that unify the struct desc_struct and friends
across x86_64 and i386. As usual, it provides paravirt capabilities as a
side-effect for x86_64.
I consider the main goal, namely, of unifying the desc_struct, an ongoing
effort, being this the beginning. A lot of old code has to be touched to
accomplish that.
I don't consider this patch ready for inclusion.
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 20/21] i386 Ldt cleanups 3
...r(ptr, pc->ldt, size))
err = -EFAULT;
- up(&mm->context.sem);
+ up(&pc->sem);
if (err < 0)
goto error_return;
if (size != bytecount) {
@@ -176,10 +181,11 @@ static int read_default_ldt(void __user
static int write_ldt(void __user * ptr, unsigned long bytecount, int oldmode)
{
- struct mm_struct * mm = current->mm;
+ mm_context_t *pc = ¤t->mm->context;
__u32 entry_1, entry_2;
int error;
struct user_desc ldt_info;
+ int page_number;
error = -EINVAL;
if (bytecount != sizeof(ldt_info))
@@ -198,9 +204,11 @@ static int write_ldt(void __user...
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 20/21] i386 Ldt cleanups 3
...r(ptr, pc->ldt, size))
err = -EFAULT;
- up(&mm->context.sem);
+ up(&pc->sem);
if (err < 0)
goto error_return;
if (size != bytecount) {
@@ -176,10 +181,11 @@ static int read_default_ldt(void __user
static int write_ldt(void __user * ptr, unsigned long bytecount, int oldmode)
{
- struct mm_struct * mm = current->mm;
+ mm_context_t *pc = ¤t->mm->context;
__u32 entry_1, entry_2;
int error;
struct user_desc ldt_info;
+ int page_number;
error = -EINVAL;
if (bytecount != sizeof(ldt_info))
@@ -198,9 +204,11 @@ static int write_ldt(void __user...
2009 Dec 29
0
aMSN segfaults at login after configuring my home network
...eration = 34
blockTime = {sec = 134532880, usec = 134532892}
tsdPtr = 0x80770f0
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
#40 0xb7e28f19 in Tcl_DoOneEvent (flags=-3)
at /build/buildd/tcl8.5-8.5.7/unix/../generic/tclNotify.c:991
result = 0
oldMode = 0
sourcePtr = <value optimized out>
timePtr = <value optimized out>
#41 0xb7dec622 in Tcl_VwaitObjCmd (clientData=0x0, interp=0x80563a0, objc=2,
objv=0x81b7a38)
at /build/buildd/tcl8.5-8.5.7/unix/../generic/tclEvent.c:1248
done = 0
foundEvent =...
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
Chris Wright wrote:
>* Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com) wrote:
>
>
>>Does Xen assume page aligned descriptor tables? I assume from this
>>
>>
>
>Yes.
>
>
>
>>patch and snippets I have gathered from others, that is a yes, and other
>>things here imply that DT pages are not shadowed. If so, Xen itself
>>must have live segments
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
Chris Wright wrote:
>* Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com) wrote:
>
>
>>Does Xen assume page aligned descriptor tables? I assume from this
>>
>>
>
>Yes.
>
>
>
>>patch and snippets I have gathered from others, that is a yes, and other
>>things here imply that DT pages are not shadowed. If so, Xen itself
>>must have live segments