Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "oldgenericvalu".
Did you mean:
oldgenericvalue
2007 Jul 17
0
[LLVMdev] GenericValue changes from 1.8 to 2.0
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Sarah Thompson wrote:
> Do I understand correctly that there is nothing that the current gcc
> front end generates that wouldn't fit an old-style GenericValue? I'm
> wondering if this might be an interim approach that would avoid me
> needing to rewrite huge amounts of code, and since we're not likely to
> be supporting anything other than C and C++
2007 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] GenericValue changes from 1.8 to 2.0
...>
> Right now, the only interesting thing is 128-bit integers. You can get
> these on 64-bit targets if you use some funky GCC extensions. Normal code
> only produces "usual" sized integers.
>
OK, in that case I have a 2 phase plan:
1: Refactor my code to use a 'OldGenericValue' class that resembles the
pre-2.0 version of GenericValue, and implement conversions as necessary.
This will require relatively few changes to my code, so shouldn't be too
much of a problem as a first step. This should leave me with a working
model checker relatively quickly (and fewer...
2007 Jul 17
3
[LLVMdev] GenericValue changes from 1.8 to 2.0
Reid Spencer wrote:
> Hi Sarah,
>
> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 10:05 -0700, Sarah Thompson wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been quiet for a while, but I'm liable to be less so now that I'm
>> starting on porting our model checker from LLVM 1.8 to 2.0.
>>
>
> We missed you! :)
>
>
Yes, apologies again for not making the