search for: olddate

Hi group, suppose I have a date, say May 15 2004, and I want to now what date it is 23 days before that date. The way to calculate the new date should (...) take account of leap years :) In pseudocode: olddate <- "May 15 2004" newdate <- olddate-23 I looked around in POSIXct etc..., maybe I overlooked? Thanks, Maarten -------------------------------------------------------------- Zie ook/see also: http://www.knmi.nl/maildisclaimer.html

...35 The following gives me the balance of state AR: dataa$newbalance[data$newstate == 'AR'] 1170 2700 Now, I have another different data frame datab, it is very similar to data, except that the name of the columns are different, and the order of the columns are different: oldstate olddate oldbalance oldid oldaccounts 1 AR 31DEC2012 1234 7 40 2 WA 31DEC2012 2222 3 30 3 VA 31DEC2012 2345 5 23 3 AR 31DEC2012 5673 5 23 datab$oldbalance[datab$oldstate== &...

...10+M files on them. I do not delete old backups - which take 60min >> per tree or more just so rsync can recreate them all in an empty >> target dir when <1% of files change per day (takes 3-5 hrs per >> backup!). >> >> Instead, I cycle them in with mv $olddate $today then rsync --del >> --link-dest over them - takes 30-60 min depending. (Yes, some >> malleability of permissions risk there, mostly interested in >> contents tho). Problem is, if a file exists AT ALL, even out of >> date, a new copy is put overtop of it per t...

...many servers with --link-dest that have filesystems of 10+M files on them. I do not delete old backups - which take 60min per tree or more just so rsync can recreate them all in an empty target dir when <1% of files change per day (takes 3-5 hrs per backup!). Instead, I cycle them in with mv $olddate $today then rsync --del --link-dest over them - takes 30-60 min depending. (Yes, some malleability of permissions risk there, mostly interested in contents tho). Problem is, if a file exists AT ALL, even out of date, a new copy is put overtop of it per the above man page decree. Thus much more di...

...that have filesystems of > 10+M files on them. I do not delete old backups - which take 60min > per tree or more just so rsync can recreate them all in an empty > target dir when <1% of files change per day (takes 3-5 hrs per > backup!). > > Instead, I cycle them in with mv $olddate $today then rsync --del > --link-dest over them - takes 30-60 min depending. (Yes, some > malleability of permissions risk there, mostly interested in > contents tho). Problem is, if a file exists AT ALL, even out of > date, a new copy is put overtop of it per the above man page > d...

...do not delete old backups - which take 60min > >> per tree or more just so rsync can recreate them all in an empty > >> target dir when <1% of files change per day (takes 3-5 hrs per > >> backup!). > >> > >> Instead, I cycle them in with mv $olddate $today then rsync --del > >> --link-dest over them - takes 30-60 min depending. (Yes, some > >> malleability of permissions risk there, mostly interested in > >> contents tho). Problem is, if a file exists AT ALL, even out of > >> date, a new copy is put...

...many servers with --link-dest that have filesystems of 10+M files on them. I do not delete old backups - which take 60min per tree or more just so rsync can recreate them all in an empty target dir when <1% of files change per day (takes 3-5 hrs per backup!). Instead, I cycle them in with mv $olddate $today then rsync --del --link-dest over them - takes 30-60 min depending. (Yes, some malleability of permissions risk there, mostly interested in contents tho). Problem is, if a file exists AT ALL, even out of date, a new copy is put overtop of it per the above man page decree. Thus much more di...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/14/2015 11:35 PM, Henri Shustak wrote: >> Ill take a look but I imagine I cant backup the 80 Million files >> I need to in under the 5 hours i have for nightly >> maintenance/backups. Currently it's possible by recycling >> directories... I would expect that recycling directories actually makes this worse. With an