Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "old_lsp".
Did you mean:
old_qlsp
2007 Aug 07
1
Attempting to shrink speex: Are these functions necessary?
...that my data size can be shrunk considerably, however I do not know the minimum values that I would set the static arrays to be. I hate to be a bother but could you tell me the minimum values for these arrays/structures in the state structure? Thanks!
encode:
stack
winBuf
excBuf
swBuf
lagWindow
old_lsp
old_qlsp
mem_sp
mem_sw
mem_sw_whole
mem_exc
mem_exc2
pi_gain
pitch
decode:
stack
excBuf
interp_qlpc
old_qlsp
mem_sp
pi_gain
>>> Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> 08/06/07 7:04 PM >>>
Last thing. All the codebooks are stored as tables of char, so you're...
2007 Aug 07
0
Attempting to shrink speex: Are these functions necessary?
...unk considerably,
> however I do not know the minimum values that I would set the static
> arrays to be. I hate to be a bother but could you tell me the
> minimum values for these arrays/structures in the state structure?
> Thanks!
>
> encode: stack winBuf excBuf swBuf lagWindow old_lsp old_qlsp mem_sp
> mem_sw mem_sw_whole mem_exc mem_exc2 pi_gain pitch
>
> decode: stack excBuf interp_qlpc old_qlsp mem_sp pi_gain
What I meant is that you can reduce the stack part (assuming you're not
already using VAR_ARRAYS or USE_ALLOCA). The other variables above still
require...
2005 May 25
3
Speex on TI C6x, Problem with TI C5x Patch
...spx_coef_t));
st->bw_lpc1 = speex_alloc((st->lpcSize+1)*sizeof(spx_coef_t));
st->bw_lpc2 = speex_alloc((st->lpcSize+1)*sizeof(spx_coef_t));
st->lsp = speex_alloc((st->lpcSize)*sizeof(spx_lsp_t));
st->qlsp = speex_alloc((st->lpcSize)*sizeof(spx_lsp_t));
st->old_lsp = speex_alloc((st->lpcSize)*sizeof(spx_lsp_t));
st->old_qlsp = speex_alloc((st->lpcSize)*sizeof(spx_lsp_t));
st->interp_lsp = speex_alloc((st->lpcSize)*sizeof(spx_lsp_t));
st->interp_qlsp = speex_alloc((st->lpcSize)*sizeof(spx_lsp_t));
st->first = 1;
for (i=0...