search for: olavsunde

...create official ?blessed builds?, compiled by Xiph for security reasons. http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-July/004274.html However, this sounds like something that can be sorted out after the release of the source tarball, no? Maurits On 23 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Olav Sunde <ogs at olavsunde.net> wrote: > I'd definately recommend binaries for download as suggested by lvqcl and Janne Hyv?rinen. All the fabolous work on the code base is of little use to me if I can not find binaries at the official site. > > Olav Sunde > > > At 12:01 23.11.2014, Janne Hyv?rin...

I'd definately recommend binaries for download as suggested by lvqcl and Janne Hyv?rinen. All the fabolous work on the code base is of little use to me if I can not find binaries at the official site. Olav Sunde At 12:01 23.11.2014, Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: >On 23.11.2014 12:44, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> lvqcl wrote: >>> 2) Do you plan to release any official binaries

Olav Sunde wrote: > very good to see activity on flac development again. I am not a developer > unfortunately, but I'd like to check with you if updating code for > flac/metaflac to handle high-rez files (24/192 or higher) for writing Replay > Gain tags is in your 'pile' of things to fix? I think there are patches to do that in the queue. Perhaps you can check back in

..."Re: Contents of flac-dev digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Sourceforge website redirecting (Olav Sunde) > 2. Re: Sourceforge website redirecting (Martijn van Beurden) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Olav Sunde <ogs at olavsunde.net> > To: flac-dev at xiph.org > Cc: > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:11:24 +0200 > Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Sourceforge website redirecting > At 09:06 26.06.2013, you wrote: > > Olav Sunde wrote: > > > I just followed the redirect Ralph Giles posted about above. That w...

At 10:55 01.02.2012, you wrote: Hi Erik, very good to see activity on flac development again. I am not a developer unfortunately, but I'd like to check with you if updating code for flac/metaflac to handle high-rez files (24/192 or higher) for writing Replay Gain tags is in your 'pile' of things to fix? Thanks Olav Sunde >Hi all, > >Some time ago, I foolishly agreed to

At 09:33 02.02.2012, you wrote: Thanks Erik, I'll check back. This next is a feature request: Today it is not possible to know the encoding of a flac archive. Many new devices support playback of flac, however tiny processors sometimes have a hard time decoding files with the default encoding of -5 or higher, resulting in unstable playback or even reduced audio quality. A re-encoding to -0

As an ordinary user I would like to extend THANK YOU to all the programmers involved in version 1.3.0. As someone who is not a programmer I am deeply impressed by the skills and involvement I have witnessed since I subscribed to this list in January 2012. The last piece would be to have 1.3.0 binaries available for download. Most links under download still point to 1.2.1 at Sourceforge. Best

Hi has anyone looked at adding R128gain code to metaflac so we can select to use this calculation for RP tags rather than replay gain? If this message turns up twice I apologize. I may have used the wrong subject tag Regards Olav Sunde -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

At 10:38 26.09.2015, you wrote: >On 26 September 2015 at 09:22, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > >> https://sourceforge.net/p/flac/feature-requests/91/ >> [...] >> Thoughts? > >The last comment on the page makes a valid point. If companies start >to sell 32bit tracks these days, flac may as well start to support it. >Personally,

At 14:16 06.02.2012, you wrote: >Olav, > >A change like this could easily break the format. That would be a bad choice. That makes sense. Explains why it is not there today. >On the other hand, an informational 'application' block could be added in a way that does not break the format, and this would even be backwards compatible since 'application' blocks have

Hi has anyone looked at adding R128gain code to metaflac so we can select to use this calculation for RP tags rather than replay gain? Best regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20140615/1c1ca9c9/attachment.htm

I mention metaflac because there are a few shell scripts that use it to write RG tags in a flac music library on Linux. With support for Ebu R128 gain in metaflac (the calculation according to specification, not an external program) it would be easy to use, just change the cmd line for metaflac in the script. Now that metaflac supports sample rates higher than 48kHz this would be a good thing in