search for: olafm

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "olafm".

Did you mean: olaf
2010 Aug 23
3
sendmailR-package-valid code needed
## Not run: from <- sprintf("<sendmailR@ to <- "<olafm at datensplitter.net>" subject <- "Hello from R" msg <- "It works!" sendmail(from, to, subject, msg, control=list(smtpServer="ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM")) ## End(Not run) the above commands are provided in this document ie http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages...
2010 Feb 19
1
Fix for incorrect use of restrict in xz third party code
...the included liblzma is used instead of a system wide one, so it might not be worth the trouble of patching the sources instead of waiting for a new release. If anyone wants to apply a fix, I have prepared a patch with all the changes which can be found here http://www.statistik.tu-dortmund.de/~olafm/temp/xz_restrict.patch Cheers, Olaf Mersmann
2004 Jan 06
1
Grouping data.frames
Hello all, I'm new to R (and the S language in general) so go easy on me if this is really simple. Given a data.frame df which looks like this: f1 f2 f3 f4 c1 c2 1 y y a b 10 20 2 n y b a 20 20 3 n n b b 8 10 4 y n a a 30 5 I'd like to aggregate it by the factors f1 and f2 (or f2 and f3, or any other combination of the three) and compute the sum of c1 and c2 (as separate values). I
2007 Apr 11
1
package incompatibility under 2.5.0 (please respond directly, I am not on r-devel)
...s" or "dimnames<-" for any class inheriting from "data.frame". Best regards Jens Oehlschl?gel > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Uwe.Ligges at R-Project.org > Gesendet: 08.04.07 16:50:29 > An: joehl at web.de > CC: Uwe.Ligges at R-Project.org,olafm at kimberly.tako.de > Betreff: Package ref_0.92.tar.gz did not pass R CMD check > Dear package maintainer, > > this notification has been generated automatically. > Your package ref_0.92.tar.gz did not pass 'R CMD check' on > Windows and will be omitted from the corresp...
2012 May 20
1
CRAN (and crantastic) updates this week
CRAN (and crantastic) updates this week New packages ------------ * bisectr (0.0.2) Maintainer: Winston Chang Author(s): Winston Chang <winston at stdout.org> License: GPL-2 http://crantastic.org/packages/bisectr Tools to find bad commits with git bisect * CUMP (1.0) Maintainer: Xuan Liu Author(s): Xuan Liu <liuxuan at bu.edu> and Qiong Yang <qyang at bu.edu>
2010 Aug 24
0
mlm for within subject design
...ug 2010 14:56:58 +0100 Subject: Re: [R] sendmailR-package-valid code needed Hi veepsirtt This code is fragmented due to the syntax of the example not being parsed as intended to text. The source of \examples for sendmail.Rd is: from <- sprintf("", Sys.info()[4]) to <- "< olafm at datensplitter.net>" subject <- "Hello from R" msg <- "It works!" sendmail(from, to, subject, msg, control=list(smtpServer="ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM")) Cheers Chris Hadley Wickham, Creator of ggplot2 - teaching in the UK. 1st - 2nd November 2010...
2008 Dec 18
0
DTrace probes for R
I've integrated some DTrace [1] probes into R. Namely a probe which fires on fuction entry and return and one which fires before / after a garbage collection. Is there any interest in merging something like this into R-devel? If yes, I'd like to discuss which probes and what data would be useful / interesting from a developers standpoint. Greetings from Dortmund, Olaf Mersmann [1]
2010 Aug 30
1
Surprising behavior of Negate()
Dear R-developers, I find the current behavior of Negate() somewhat confusing. It does not match the passed function 'f' until the returned function is called for the first time. To see an example of what this can do see the following (contrived) example: f <- function(x) is.integer(x) not_f <- Negate(f) f <- function(x) is.character(x) ## Both should, in my mind,
2011 Jan 24
1
Possible bug in R parser
Dear R developers, A recent typo led me to discover, that R is happy to accept > 20x2 [1] 20 as input. This appears to be related to the parsing of hexadecimal constants, since there must be a zero before the 'x' (i.e. 2x2 or 02x02 gives the expected error). All this is under R 2.12.1 on both OS X and Linux. Is this expected behavior? Cheers, Olaf Mersmann
2008 Dec 27
1
Patch to fix small bug in do_External and do_dotcall
I've stumbled upon a small bug/inconsitency in do_External and do_dotcall: Here's an example: % LC_ALL=C R --vanilla < symname-bug.R R version 2.8.0 (2008-10-20) *snip* > options(error=expression(0)) > ## Call 'R_GD_nullDevice' with incorrect parameter count: > .Call("R_GD_nullDevice", 1) Error in .Call("R_GD_nullDevice", 1) :