search for: okays

Hi, We have a number of 4200''s setup using a combination of an SVM 4 way mirror and a ZFS raidz stripe. Each disk (of 4) is divided up like this / 6GB UFS s0 Swap 8GB s1 /var 6GB UFS s3 Metadb 50MB UFS s4 /data 48GB ZFS s5 For SVM we do a 4 way mirror on /,swap, and /var So we have 3 SVM mirrors d0=root (sub mirrors d10, d20, d30, d40) d1=swap (sub mirrors d11, d21,d31,d41)

Hi, I''ve not tried pv_ops for a long time but just got a new system (Supermicro X9DRL-iF) so decided to try 3.5.0 with the latest Xen 4.2-unstable, unfortunately the system crashes immediately after loading dom0: traps.c:486:d0 Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap [#6] on VCPU 0 [ec=0000] I''ve tried loading both bzImage and vmlinuz (gzip compressed vmlinuz) with the same

Hi, Recently I noticed file.copy() would discard the file mode information. Is this the expected behaviour or a bug for file.copy()? > file.create('testfile') [1] TRUE > file.info('testfile') size isdir mode mtime ctime testfile 0 FALSE 644 2011-03-05 17:06:39 2011-03-05 17:06:39 atime uid gid uname grname

Hi, Recently I noticed file.copy() would discard the file mode information. Is this the expected behaviour or a bug for file.copy()? > file.create('testfile') [1] TRUE > file.info('testfile') size isdir mode mtime ctime testfile 0 FALSE 644 2011-03-05 17:06:39 2011-03-05 17:06:39 atime uid gid uname grname

While checking packages against R 2.13.0-beta on Windows, I have run into a few strange error messages related to copying files. The errors all relate to file.copy() and have the form of: Error in Sys.chmod(to[okay], file.info(from[okay])$mode, TRUE) : 'mode' must be of length at least one After half a day of tinkering, the best reproducible example I can come up with involves using

On 09/09/2014 01:53 PM, Dan Liew wrote: >> It looks like LLVMConfigLibs was created in r112714 for local use in >> Makefile.rules. The only use outside Makefile.rules is now in >> cmake/modules/Makefile. Teaching cmake/modules/Makefile to do >> a direct invocation would be fine with me. > > Okay. Attached is a patch that does this. Does this work okay for you?

Can we install both Wine and Cedega okay? no conflict? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20051016/c6ab284f/attachment.htm

Does anyone know if enabling profiling all the time is okay to do? I'm worried that the accounting pieces might cause increased memory usage over time or some other issues. I was hoping to enable that to be able to track performance over time with our monitoring software. My plan was to run gluster volume profile info every couple of minutes and track the latency and bytes read/written for

Can someone confirm whether the following is a known clang bug? I am having a lot of trouble compiling some old legacy code due to this error. I know "using namespace" is horrible but that doesn't make it illegal (g++ accepts this). The fix is easy but there are just too many instances of this in the legacy code. The following is not from the code I am trying to compile but is

Dear all, There appears to be a bug in how constrOptim handles ... arguments that are suppose to be passed to optim, according to the documentation. This means you can't get the hessian to be returned, for example (so this is a real problem, and not just a question of mistaken documentation). Looking at the code, it appears that a call to the user-defined f includes the ..., when the ...

Is it okay to pass null values to the destinations of InvokeInst::Create? I checked the code and it looks like it'd be okay, but the Create method doesn't make them optional, so I'm uncertain. Perhaps a specific Create function without destinations can be added to make it clear that it's okay (of course assuming you eventually call setNormal/UnwindDest). -- edA-qa mort-ora-y --

I'm doing a huge rsync from one net to another (about a terabyte) over a dedicated DS-3. One rsync doesn't even come close to saturating the line, especially with compression enabled. Is it okay to run multiple rsyncs copying the same source to the same destination or do I have to take care that they work on disjoint sections of the source directory tree? Thanks, Skip Montanaro

Hi all, I use suse linux 9 with samba.3.0.2 In the smb.conf among others there are: ---------------------------------------------------------- ;basic server settings workgroup = NIK server string = SZERVER socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 wins support = yes name resolve order = wins lmhosts hosts bcast ---------------------------------------------------------- It is

Okay, this will never come to an end otherwise: I would like to use <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/> as the license for the complete content of the wiki. The content on the wiki is *NOT* licensed at all at the moment. So this call goes out to *ALL* people who have already contributed to the wiki: Is it okay with you to use this license for your content on the wiki? If

On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 4:26 AM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:59 PM David Zarzycki via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Oct 30, 2019, at 5:57 PM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> On 10/30/2019 03:09 AM, Stephan Bergmann

Running notmuch from git on Debian testing[1] with the mail and database sitting on a ZFS filesystem, adding mail to a new database: > agrajag-testing ~/s/notmuch % ./notmuch new > Found 605510 total files (that's not much mail). > add_file: A Xapian exception occurred36m 37s remaining). > A Xapian exception occurred adding message: Unexpected end of posting list for

> On Oct 30, 2019, at 5:57 PM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 10/30/2019 03:09 AM, Stephan Bergmann via llvm-dev wrote: >> You can apparently leave comments on GitHub commits (instead of commenting at Phabricator, or directly sending a reply to the relevant commit mailing list and relevant CCs). I once accidentally did that myself

Hello, i use doevecot 2.2.18 current. My Problem is with email-extension and case sensitiv folders. Example: user+extenstion will be delivered to the user and subfolder extenstion so this is okay. but user+extenstion will not be delivert to the user and exiting subfolder Extenstion so that is not okay. The mail will be also delivered in the subfolder extension. The exiting Folder Extension will

>Yeah, that's exactly right, Aaron. "true" is a command that simply >returns with an exit status of 0 and ignores its arguments. When pod2man >can't be found we define the variable that specifies its path as "true >pod2man". This allows the command that should have been run to be shown >while at the same time not interrupting the makefile with a failure.

On Mon, 3 May 2004, Anders Alexandersson wrote: > Hello! > > I'm having trouble with pointer traversing. I have a design as follows: > class -> map -> classFunctions > > Starting with a pointer to the class, I want to get a pointer to a > classFunction via a pointer to the map. Okay... > I can't get that function pointer! > > How shall I think to get