search for: ogguvs

Hi all, I'm soliciting comments on OggUVS, a proposed method of encapsulating uncompressed video in Ogg files. Please have a look at: http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/OggUVS First note, on the supported colorspaces: I know they're lacking. Had a good conversation with derf_ about it last night, and when I get some time I'll add...

Hi all, I'm soliciting comments on OggUVS, a proposed method of encapsulating uncompressed video in Ogg files. Please have a look at: http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/OggUVS First note, on the supported colorspaces: I know they're lacking. Had a good conversation with derf_ about it last night, and when I get some time I'll add...

...n yuv4mpeg will have the magic number: char[8]: 'YUV4MPEG'. Which was previously for those not paying attention char[9]: 'YUV4MPEG2'. > Also, can you put the link to the spec into > http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/MIMETypesCodecs ? AFAIK, that is just a matter of putting a [[OggUVS]] in there. At least that's what I reckon to be the spec for YUV4MPEG encapsulation. -Ivo

...iles. So, this is what I suggest: Vorbis: .ogg & .vorbis Theora: .ogg & .theora (or .video as I've seen suggested several times) FLAC: .ogg & .flac (yes, I'm fully aware that FLAC can exist without Ogg, but it's about unity) Speex: .ogg & .spx OggPCM: .ogg & .oggpcm OggUVS: .ogg & .ogguvs For mixed content of other kinds, like Writ, or crazy combinations of the above, or external codecs (MPEG 4, whatever), one has accept the default .ogg only, because it's not possible to state an extension for every possible use of Ogg. The idea is to allow dual extension...

...iles. So, this is what I suggest: Vorbis: .ogg & .vorbis Theora: .ogg & .theora (or .video as I've seen suggested several times) FLAC: .ogg & .flac (yes, I'm fully aware that FLAC can exist without Ogg, but it's about unity) Speex: .ogg & .spx OggPCM: .ogg & .oggpcm OggUVS: .ogg & .ogguvs For mixed content of other kinds, like Writ, or crazy combinations of the above, or external codecs (MPEG 4, whatever), one has accept the default .ogg only, because it's not possible to state an extension for every possible use of Ogg. The idea is to allow dual extension...

...iles. So, this is what I suggest: Vorbis: .ogg & .vorbis Theora: .ogg & .theora (or .video as I've seen suggested several times) FLAC: .ogg & .flac (yes, I'm fully aware that FLAC can exist without Ogg, but it's about unity) Speex: .ogg & .spx OggPCM: .ogg & .oggpcm OggUVS: .ogg & .ogguvs For mixed content of other kinds, like Writ, or crazy combinations of the above, or external codecs (MPEG 4, whatever), one has accept the default .ogg only, because it's not possible to state an extension for every possible use of Ogg. The idea is to allow dual extension...

...iles. So, this is what I suggest: Vorbis: .ogg & .vorbis Theora: .ogg & .theora (or .video as I've seen suggested several times) FLAC: .ogg & .flac (yes, I'm fully aware that FLAC can exist without Ogg, but it's about unity) Speex: .ogg & .spx OggPCM: .ogg & .oggpcm OggUVS: .ogg & .ogguvs For mixed content of other kinds, like Writ, or crazy combinations of the above, or external codecs (MPEG 4, whatever), one has accept the default .ogg only, because it's not possible to state an extension for every possible use of Ogg. The idea is to allow dual extension...

...iles. So, this is what I suggest: Vorbis: .ogg & .vorbis Theora: .ogg & .theora (or .video as I've seen suggested several times) FLAC: .ogg & .flac (yes, I'm fully aware that FLAC can exist without Ogg, but it's about unity) Speex: .ogg & .spx OggPCM: .ogg & .oggpcm OggUVS: .ogg & .ogguvs For mixed content of other kinds, like Writ, or crazy combinations of the above, or external codecs (MPEG 4, whatever), one has accept the default .ogg only, because it's not possible to state an extension for every possible use of Ogg. The idea is to allow dual extension...

On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > Have we got a spec? If not, we may want to remove it altogether and > make the fixes in our wiki as the spec develops. We have a draft spec with no implementation. I can't imagine the magic changing, so I think it's ok to leave it in, but I'm ok to remove it if you think that's best. I do think there's little