search for: oggserials

...how Oggs work. (!!) I figured that multiple elements can be described using URIs. > A URI/URL scheme for referencing streams would be a generally useful > thing. Should we override the query mechanism like the time fragment > draft? "?oggserial=0x15323421" ? Please explain how oggserials works. If all items (audio, text, images, ...) in an Ogg stream can be described using oggserials; than a oggserial attribute should be used instead of a more generic URI attribute. A quick an dirty example describing the relation between an image and audio. <image oggserial="something&...

Daniel Aleksandersen wrote: > On Saturday 08. September 2007 11:40:05 Ian Malone wrote: >> Daniel Aleksandersen wrote: >>> Hi again list, >>> >>> Attached is a much improved version of yesterday's draft. Introducing >>> the audio:collection:artwork element to deal with album cover graphics >>> and such. >>> >>> After

Ralph Giles wrote: > > A URI/URL scheme for referencing streams would be a generally useful > thing. Should we override the query mechanism like the time fragment > draft? "?oggserial=0x15323421" ? > This is roughly what was suggested the last time around. A possible refinement is to provide a mapping from identifiers to IDs so you could say "?oggid=myvideo".

On 2007-09-09, Silvia wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > > I really have to ask you: Have you even tried to describe media using > > the excising solutions? I don't mean adding subtitles and editing > > stuff. I mean really say what a Ogg file contins. There is no working > > wheels for this. Vorbis comments--used in FLAC too--can describe > > content with a very

Hi Daniel, On 9/10/07, Daniel Aleksandersen <aleksandersen@runbox.com> wrote: > It is indeed necessary. I hope this format will be a huge leap in metadata > descriptions for media content. Not only for music, but any media found in > Oggs. You are thinking too small. Such standards should not be made to just work with Ogg, but rather possible to work with any media format out

Hi Daniel,, > I really have to ask you: Have you even tried to describe media using the > excising solutions? I don't mean adding subtitles and editing stuff. I mean > really say what a Ogg file contins. There is no working wheels for this. > Vorbis comments--used in FLAC too--can describe content with a very limited > field names (and badly enforced standards). I have and I

On Monday 10. September 2007 01:10:44 Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 9/10/07, Daniel Aleksandersen <aleksandersen@runbox.com> wrote: > > It is indeed necessary. I hope this format will be a huge leap in > > metadata descriptions for media content. Not only for music, but any > > media found in Oggs. > > You are thinking too small. Such standards

On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 11:37:05AM +0100, Ian Malone wrote: > This needs more support. CMML already uses fragment identifiers > to label clips and there is also a need to be able to find the > labelled resource. And earlier wrote: > <video encoding="application/theora+ogg" /> > et cetera, I think you want to avoid duplicating technical > metadata like this

Actually, we have been discussing this kind of addressing for a very long time and it was half the point of the Annodex project (see www.annodex.net). What we have defined for addressing is the following: * temporal addressing: http://annodex.net/TR/draft-pfeiffer-temporal-fragments-03.txt Any ogg file can be addresses through temporal offsets. This goes across different logical bitstreams. *

Daniel, these are all good ideas and worth progressing. However, it may be better not to merge too many goals in one format (MPEG-7 did that and ended up as a big mess). So, I suggest to start by structuring the types of things you want - then finding out which parts belong where into existing formats such as vorbis comment, Skeleton and CMML, and only then start to develop a new format. For