search for: oggless

...issues that are to be discussed prior to the meeting. Agenda * OggPCM: is it finished? May we start supporting it in our tools (e.g. decoding on ogg123, encoding on oggenc)? * OggPlay: status. This project will be vital on the competition to get <video> and <audio> to use our formats * Oggless proposal: opinion by other Xiph members other than Ivo, Silvia, Sebastian, and Conrad needed * MIME Types and File Extensions proposal: same as above * Ambisonics: what's the status? Are we having a libambi for all codecs? * Change of Wiki license from CC-BY-SA (Similar to GPL) to CC-BY (simila...

...issues that are to be discussed prior to the meeting. Agenda * OggPCM: is it finished? May we start supporting it in our tools (e.g. decoding on ogg123, encoding on oggenc)? * OggPlay: status. This project will be vital on the competition to get <video> and <audio> to use our formats * Oggless proposal: opinion by other Xiph members other than Ivo, Silvia, Sebastian, and Conrad needed * MIME Types and File Extensions proposal: same as above * Ambisonics: what's the status? Are we having a libambi for all codecs? * Change of Wiki license from CC-BY-SA (Similar to GPL) to CC-BY (simila...

...issues that are to be discussed prior to the meeting. Agenda * OggPCM: is it finished? May we start supporting it in our tools (e.g. decoding on ogg123, encoding on oggenc)? * OggPlay: status. This project will be vital on the competition to get <video> and <audio> to use our formats * Oggless proposal: opinion by other Xiph members other than Ivo, Silvia, Sebastian, and Conrad needed * MIME Types and File Extensions proposal: same as above * Ambisonics: what's the status? Are we having a libambi for all codecs? * Change of Wiki license from CC-BY-SA (Similar to GPL) to CC-BY (simila...

...issues that are to be discussed prior to the meeting. Agenda * OggPCM: is it finished? May we start supporting it in our tools (e.g. decoding on ogg123, encoding on oggenc)? * OggPlay: status. This project will be vital on the competition to get <video> and <audio> to use our formats * Oggless proposal: opinion by other Xiph members other than Ivo, Silvia, Sebastian, and Conrad needed * MIME Types and File Extensions proposal: same as above * Ambisonics: what's the status? Are we having a libambi for all codecs? * Change of Wiki license from CC-BY-SA (Similar to GPL) to CC-BY (simila...

...der and an improved encoder wrt 1.0alpha7. * other project reports/updates ***If we are to have a meeting it IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE LINKS BELOW ARE ANALYZED PRIOR TO THE MEETING, or we'll be wasting a lot of time during it.*** [1] http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut/trunk/docs/draft-xiph-oggless-00.xml?revision=126&view=markup [2] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2006-July/018508.html [3] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2007-April/018760.html [4] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2007-April/018762.html [5] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora-dev/2007-Ap...

...der and an improved encoder wrt 1.0alpha7. * other project reports/updates ***If we are to have a meeting it IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE LINKS BELOW ARE ANALYZED PRIOR TO THE MEETING, or we'll be wasting a lot of time during it.*** [1] http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut/trunk/docs/draft-xiph-oggless-00.xml?revision=126&view=markup [2] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2006-July/018508.html [3] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2007-April/018760.html [4] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2007-April/018762.html [5] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora-dev/2007-Ap...

...der and an improved encoder wrt 1.0alpha7. * other project reports/updates ***If we are to have a meeting it IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE LINKS BELOW ARE ANALYZED PRIOR TO THE MEETING, or we'll be wasting a lot of time during it.*** [1] http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut/trunk/docs/draft-xiph-oggless-00.xml?revision=126&view=markup [2] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2006-July/018508.html [3] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2007-April/018760.html [4] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2007-April/018762.html [5] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora-dev/2007-Ap...

...der and an improved encoder wrt 1.0alpha7. * other project reports/updates ***If we are to have a meeting it IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE LINKS BELOW ARE ANALYZED PRIOR TO THE MEETING, or we'll be wasting a lot of time during it.*** [1] http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut/trunk/docs/draft-xiph-oggless-00.xml?revision=126&view=markup [2] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2006-July/018508.html [3] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2007-April/018760.html [4] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2007-April/018762.html [5] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora-dev/2007-Ap...

...der and an improved encoder wrt 1.0alpha7. * other project reports/updates ***If we are to have a meeting it IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE LINKS BELOW ARE ANALYZED PRIOR TO THE MEETING, or we'll be wasting a lot of time during it.*** [1] http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut/trunk/docs/draft-xiph-oggless-00.xml?revision=126&view=markup [2] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2006-July/018508.html [3] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2007-April/018760.html [4] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2007-April/018762.html [5] http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora-dev/2007-Ap...

...not than a consolidated single packet ? Additionally, is there some kind of guidelines about header packet design, and the constraints or recommendations about it ? I'm thinking about parsing those packets by a parser that doesn't know their format, from, eg, http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/Oggless, that specify a way to skip those headers without actually understanding them. This had me thinking about adding a length field to headers (and maybe all packets). This seemed to be useless when the stream is encapsulated in Ogg, but now seems like a good fallback idea, though it means a low-ish o...

...ting. > Additionally, is there some kind of guidelines about header packet > design, and > the constraints or recommendations about it ? I'm thinking about > parsing those > packets by a parser that doesn't know their format, from, eg, > http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/Oggless, that specify a way to skip > those headers without actually understanding them. So I'd say: * Ogg requires some way to identify the codec from the first packet. * Lots of frameworks either don't expect headers at all, or treat them as a single blob, so they may have to pack multip...