search for: ogden

I've used ssh as a secure telnet up to now but done little else with it. The FreeBSD machines I look after on our internet-facing network all have one account which I connect to for administration. I've set up /etc/hosts.allow on all the machines to only allow ssh from a limited internal network range. Now I want to create a new account on one machine which will be accessible from the

...or mcpu to exist, but should never have been added to the GCC aarch64 port at all since there's no compatibility with existing build systems to worry about. I would still like you to show this mythical piece of software that needs this compatibility. -eric On Jan 8, 2014 3:06 AM, "Bernie Ogden" <bogden at arm.com> wrote: > I think there's an error in the example here. > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.2/gcc/AArch64-Options.html still > documents -mcpu, and that march does not take CPUs as arguments. A local > GCC developer tells me that the documentation...

...can write to the files from other machines fine. Within smbstatus, it says the file is RDONLY and oplock is NONE when I write to the directory itself and not the mount. I'm wondering if I set things up alright and whether it is bad practice to write to the directory directly? Thank you Ogden

On 8 January 2014 12:32, Bernard Ogden <Bernard.Ogden at arm.com> wrote: > I don't think there's software that *needs* the compatibility, but it is > easier for GCC projects to switch to clang if that compatibility is there - > which I think is why we go for GCC compatibility in the first place? > Hi Bernie,...

...ry but it's like that -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder Elvandar.org/DSINet.org www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the hackerscene -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Peter Rosa [mailto:prosa@pro.sk] Verzonden: dinsdag 27 januari 2004 21:46 Aan: Remko Lodder; Mark Ogden CC: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: [Freebsd-security] Re: Possible compromise ? Yes, but it is the way I wouldn't like to go. Because of sooo much time :-( PR ----- Original Message ----- From: "Remko Lodder" <remko@elvandar.org> To: "Mark Ogden" <...

...cdat <- dat[dat$Diagnosis==0,] cont <- lme(fixed=cform, random = ~1|StudyName, data=cdat,na.action=na.omit) Then everything is fine. I'm puzzled that the object can't be found. Maybe I'm overlooking something obvious? Best, Todd Ogden

...ean. GoodLuck! -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder Elvandar.org/DSINet.org www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the hackerscene -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: freebsd-security-bounces@lists.elvandar.org [mailto:freebsd-security-bounces@lists.elvandar.org]Namens Mark Ogden Verzonden: dinsdag 27 januari 2004 21:28 Aan: Peter Rosa CC: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Onderwerp: [Freebsd-security] Re: Possible compromise ? Peter Rosa on Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 09:23:45PM +0100 wrote: > OK, sorry for unclear previous message. > > In the past, one man teached me the F...

...tting patches and I'll be happy to review them. The standard process is to create a review on reviews.llvm.org (set me as the reviewer if it's JIT related), or post a diff to the llvm-commits mailing list (and CC me). Thanks again Sean! Cheers, Lang. On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Sean Ogden <sean at cs.cornell.edu> wrote: > It does work. I just tested it on my JIT. Thanks! > > As for the part that couples them too tightly, would you recommend I just > keep my own specialized version of CompileOnDemandLayer.h that includes > this functionality, or do you have an...

Thanks Bernie, Feel free to assign yourself to the bug report, just so we know someone is working on it. cheers, -renato On 14 October 2013 17:38, Bernard Ogden <bogden.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > I've got a trivial fix for this problem, and another one which manifests > when thumb is given without an explicit CPU. I'll start pushing it through > our submissions process. > > > On Saturday, 12 October 2013, Renato Golin wrote...

...mpatibility, which seems good enough for selfish clang purposes. As Renato pointed out, that may be the wrong attitude. Should we try to engage the GCC community here? > -----Original Message----- > From: Amara Emerson > Sent: 08 January 2014 14:07 > To: 'Renato Golin'; Bernard Ogden > Cc: Eric Christopher; LLVM Developers Mailing List; Clang Dev > Subject: RE: [cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] AArch64 Clang CLI interface proposal > > Upon thinking about this more, we could go with my original proposal > about > -march accepting both architectures and cores, which would be...

...tests. Thanks very much for working on this! Cheers, Lang. On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 8:10 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > +Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com>, Master Regent of the Three <No, Two sir> > JITs > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:31 PM Sean Ogden via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> I needed to be able to update stub pointers for hot functions that get >> recompiled in a lazy JIT that uses CompileOnDemandLayer. In order to do >> this I added a method that allows pointers to be updated but d...

...> Cheers, > Lang. > > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 8:10 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> +Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com>, Master Regent of the Three <No, Two sir> >> JITs >> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:31 PM Sean Ogden via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> I needed to be able to update stub pointers for hot functions that get >>> recompiled in a lazy JIT that uses CompileOnDemandLayer. In order to do >>> this I added a method that allows pointers...

+Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com>, Master Regent of the Three <No, Two sir> JITs On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:31 PM Sean Ogden via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I needed to be able to update stub pointers for hot functions that get > recompiled in a lazy JIT that uses CompileOnDemandLayer. In order to do > this I added a method that allows pointers to be updated but does not > expose a...

...e_table.o $(CC) -v -dynamiclib $(CFLAG) $^ -o $@ table.o:table.c $(CC) -c $(CFLAG) $^ -o $@ use_table.o:use_table.s $(CC) -c -integrated-as $(CFLAG) $^ -o $@ clean: rm *.o libtest.dylib test //==end Makefile== Cheers, Ashi On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Bernie Ogden <bogden at arm.com> wrote: > Hi Ashi,**** > > ** ** > > Your first LDR is a pseudoinstruction that is supported by some tools (gas > and armasm, at least), but not by LLVM. Roughly speaking, it turns into a > PC-relative load from a literal pool.**** > > ** ** >...

I needed to be able to update stub pointers for hot functions that get recompiled in a lazy JIT that uses CompileOnDemandLayer. In order to do this I added a method that allows pointers to be updated but does not expose any of the other internals of the COD layer. Does anyone have a cleaner way to do this? Has something to facilitate this already been added? Would it be possible to merge this

Hi Ashi, Your first LDR is a pseudoinstruction that is supported by some tools (gas and armasm, at least), but not by LLVM. Roughly speaking, it turns into a PC-relative load from a literal pool. To do what you're trying to achieve you can write your own literal pool in your assembly. You can see some examples of this sort of thing at

Hi, Does anyone know a way to override .blank? method that rails provides. I want to add additional custom checks (specific to my application) to this method. Thanks, Pratik

I've got a trivial fix for this problem, and another one which manifests when thumb is given without an explicit CPU. I'll start pushing it through our submissions process. On Saturday, 12 October 2013, Renato Golin wrote: > On 12 October 2013 23:00, Amara Emerson <amara.emerson at gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'amara.emerson at gmail.com');> > >

...t(x,y,yaxp=c(240,480,6)) dont work I try plot(x,y,yaxp=c(240,480,6),ylim=range(240,480)) dont work too. How I make this control? Thanks Ronaldo -- The turtle lives 'twixt plated decks Which practically conceal its sex. I think it clever of the turtle In such a fix to be so fertile. -- Ogden Nash -- |> // | \\ [***********************************] | ( ? ? ) [Ronaldo Reis J?nior ] |> V [UFV/DBA-Entomologia ] | / \ [36571-000 Vi?osa - MG ] |> /(.''`.)\ [Fone: 31-3899-2532 ] | /(: :&...

Do you know if OpenSSH supported for OS's ibm ptx/dynix 4.51 version? Thank you ============================================ Tony T. Doan SOI Devep. & Maint. Section 1160 W 1200 S Ogden, UT 84201 M/S 6380 tony.t.doan at irs.gov 801-620-7679 phone 801-620-7614 fax -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20020624/ff3ca98b/attachment.html