search for: ofv

Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > A good measure of how fast a set of Makefile are is to run the build > with all targets up-to-date. Both builds takes a few seconds (3 or so) > on my Linux quad core box. Whatever improvement can be achieved on this > seems pretty insignifant. Oh, it's...

On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Óscar Fuentes<ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: >> Also, now msvc support multiple target. So it's better to set it as >> ${LLVM_ALL_TARGETS} >> It's can working, why not set it to:. > > I think most LLVM users on Windows are interested on X86 only. This > saves a lot of time on the bui...

Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Óscar Fuentes<ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: >> While compiling some sources, translating from my compiler's IR to LLVM >> using the C++ API requires 2.5 seconds. If the resulting LLVM module is >> dumped as LLVM assembler, the file is 240,000 lines long. Generating >> LLVM code is fast. &g...

----- Original Message ---- > From: Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > To: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > Cc: Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es>; LLVM Developers Mailing List ><llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 4:39:57 PM > Subject: Re: Circular Deps from CMake build using makefile &g...

...ns: ConstantExpr::getBitCast (ConstantDataArray::getString (getGlobalContext (), "hello"), PointerType::get (Type::getInt8Ty (getGlobalContext ()), 0)) but the LLC tool says: invalid cast opcode for cast from '[5 x i8]' to 'i8*'. Any help? 2012/12/18 Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > Alessio Giovanni Baroni <alessiogiovanni.baroni at gmail.com> writes: > > > Because I need to convert an [4 x i8] type to i8* in the instantiation > of a > > GlobalVariable. > > I have the follow declaration: %xxx = type { i8* } and I must emit...

...-g++. Are they the same? > Akramul > > --- On Tue, 21/12/10, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > > From: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM installation in Windows > To: "Óscar Fuentes" <ofv at wanadoo.es> > Cc: "akramul azim" <bijoy123_8 at yahoo.com>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Date: Tuesday, 21 December, 2010, 6:41 PM > > > Possibly the OCaml bindings are broken on Windows/MinGW. Try building > > with cmake instead of configure&make. The cm...

Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes: >> But you put me on the right track. The problem is that the class is >> returned on the stack. Correction: The class is returned on the FP stack: >> 0x6e08b5b5 <_ZN3Foo6GetFooEv+17>: fldl -0x8(%ebp) >> 0x6e08b5b8 <_ZN3Foo6GetFooEv+20>: leave >> 0x6e08b5b9 <_ZN3Foo6GetFooEv+21>:

greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > >> A good measure of how fast a set of Makefile are is to run the build >> with all targets up-to-date. Both builds takes a few seconds (3 or so) >> on my Linux quad core box. Whatever improvement can be achieved on this >> seems pretty insigni...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Stellard" <tom at stellard.net> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu, "Óscar Fuentes" <ofv at wanadoo.es> > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 10:55:43 AM > Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] LLVM 3.4 Branch Freeze > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 04:49:11PM -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Tom Stellard" <tom at...

...The Buildbot has detected a new failure of llvm-ppc-linux on llvm. Full details are available at: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-ppc-linux/builds/3229 Buildbot URL: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/ Buildslave for this Build: nick1 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: 84759 Blamelist: ofv BUILD FAILED: failed compile Apparently the problem was a warning at configure time that is interpreted as a failure by the buildbot. The mentioned svn revision is a change on docs/CMake.html which, obviously, does not affect the build at all. On the past I received multiple similar bogus messag...

Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > Okay, we can get rid of recursive make. However, as pointed out > elsewhere, removing recursive make will not make a difference on the > LLVM build. What David Greene says probably is related to difference > sizes among his compiler and LLVM. Ok, whatever....

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Óscar Fuentes<ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> writes: > >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Óscar Fuentes<ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: >>> While compiling some sources, translating from my compiler's IR to LLVM >>> using the C++ API r...

...a lot. It worked !!! Akramul --- On Wed, 22/12/10, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: From: Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM installation in Windows To: "akramul azim" <bijoy123_8 at yahoo.com> Cc: "Óscar Fuentes" <ofv at wanadoo.es>, "Anton Korobeynikov" <anton at korobeynikov.info>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Date: Wednesday, 22 December, 2010, 7:50 PM Did you specify "--program-prefix=llvm-" on your configure line? That's what tells the llvm-gcc build to use the llvm-* names for t...

...antDataArray::getString (getGlobalContext (), > "hello"), PointerType::get (Type::getInt8Ty (getGlobalContext ()), 0)) > > but the LLC tool says: invalid cast opcode for cast from '[5 x i8]' to 'i8*'. > > Any help? > > > 2012/12/18 Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es <mailto:ofv at wanadoo.es>> > > Alessio Giovanni Baroni <alessiogiovanni.baroni at gmail.com > <mailto:alessiogiovanni.baroni at gmail.com>> writes: > > > Because I need to convert an [4 x i8] type to i8* in the instantiation of a &g...

...3 at 10:57:58AM -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tom Stellard" <tom at stellard.net> > > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > > Cc: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu, "Óscar Fuentes" <ofv at wanadoo.es> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 10:55:43 AM > > Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] LLVM 3.4 Branch Freeze > > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 04:49:11PM -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "...

Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Óscar Fuentes<ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: >> I think most LLVM users on Windows are interested on X86 only. This >> saves a lot of time on the build process and creates smaller >> executables. Anyways, it they want all targets, it is simply a matter of >> passing -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=all...

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > > Apart from that, the most correct place for submitting patches is either > the llvm-commits mailing list or the bug database. > > We don't accept patches through the bug database. Patches should be sent to llvm-commits for review. -- Sean Silva ----...

Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > BTW, -fpcc-struct-return solves the case that motivated this thread. -fpcc-struct-return is an ABI change, hence it requires "compiling the world". Not acceptable. I'll be interested on hearing ideas about how to determine how a function returns a sma...

2011/1/5 Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es>: > Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> writes: > >> Yeah that's the two different ones I mean. Everything MS (intrinsics, >> language features etc...) is purely version-bound, so I don't even get >> why CMake insists on checking ever...

...Wed, January 5, 2011 3:38:21 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] include/Config/config.h discrepancies between CMake and >autofoo builds > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> > > To: Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> > > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > > Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 3:10:29 PM > > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] include/Config/config.h discrepancies between CMake >and > > >autofoo builds > > > > 2011/1/5 Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es>...