search for: ofuncs

...veau/nv50_evo.c @@ -33,17 +33,22 @@ #include <subdev/timer.h> #include <subdev/fb.h> +struct evo_object { + struct nouveau_object parent; + void __iomem *iomem; +}; + static u32 nv50_evo_rd32(struct nouveau_object *object, u32 addr) { - void __iomem *iomem = object->oclass->ofuncs->rd08; + void __iomem *iomem = ((struct evo_object *)object)->iomem; return ioread32_native(iomem + addr); } static void nv50_evo_wr32(struct nouveau_object *object, u32 addr, u32 data) { - void __iomem *iomem = object->oclass->ofuncs->rd08; + void __iomem *iomem = ((struct e...

...pu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c index 0e7733c..1a48e58 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ nouveau_parent_create_(struct nouveau_object *parent, if (ret) return ret; - while (sclass && sclass->ofuncs) { + if (sclass && sclass->ofuncs) { nclass = kzalloc(sizeof(*nclass), GFP_KERNEL); if (!nclass) return -ENOMEM; @@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ nouveau_parent_create_(struct nouveau_object *parent, object->sclass = nclass; nclass->engine = engine ? nv_engine(engine) : NULL; n...

...truct nv98_bsp_priv { - struct nouveau_engine base; + struct nouveau_falcon base; }; /******************************************************************************* @@ -37,31 +35,49 @@ struct nv98_bsp_priv { static struct nouveau_oclass nv98_bsp_sclass[] = { + { 0x88b1, &nouveau_object_ofuncs }, + { 0x85b1, &nouveau_object_ofuncs }, + { 0x86b1, &nouveau_object_ofuncs }, {}, }; /******************************************************************************* - * BSP context + * PBSP context ******************************************************************************/...

...ouveau_engine base; -}; - /******************************************************************************* * BSP object classes ******************************************************************************/ static struct nouveau_oclass nv84_bsp_sclass[] = { + { 0x74b0, &nouveau_object_ofuncs }, {}, }; @@ -48,7 +44,7 @@ static struct nouveau_oclass nv84_bsp_cclass = { .handle = NV_ENGCTX(BSP, 0x84), .ofuncs = &(struct nouveau_ofuncs) { - .ctor = _nouveau_engctx_ctor, + .ctor = _nouveau_xtensa_engctx_ctor, .dtor = _nouveau_engctx_dtor, .init = _nouveau_engctx_init,...

>From recent additional locking in nouveau, it looks like we see recursive lock acquisition in 3.8-rc6: nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:01:00.0] BOOT0 : 0x0e7150a2 nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:01:00.0] Chipset: GK107 (NVE7) nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:01:00.0] Family : NVE0 nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] checking PRAMIN for image... nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:01:00.0] ... appears to be valid nouveau [

...ase; + u32 *fw; + long fw_size; + struct nouveau_gpuobj *gpu_fw; + void *vm_gpu_fw; }; /******************************************************************************* @@ -37,6 +41,7 @@ struct nv84_bsp_priv { static struct nouveau_oclass nv84_bsp_sclass[] = { + { 0x74b0, &nouveau_object_ofuncs }, {}, }; @@ -44,11 +49,28 @@ nv84_bsp_sclass[] = { * BSP context ******************************************************************************/ +static int +nv84_bsp_engctx_ctor(struct nouveau_object *parent, + struct nouveau_object *engine, + struct nouveau_oclass *oclass,...

Hello and thanks for the answer, I'm still facing issues, I'll do my best to explain my situation, as I explained, I have two modules, each one with its own main and functions, I would like to replace in the *oldModule* a function call that is calling *foo2* (defined in *oldModule*) to instead call *foo3*, which is defined in the *refModule. *So in summary, I have: 1. The original

Hello, Anyone knows if there is a way to connect R with the ERP SAP? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/How-to-connect-R-with-SAP-tp2309018p2309018.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...> +{ > + switch (mthd) { > + case NVIF_PERFMON_V0_QUERY_SIGNAL: > + return nvkm_perfmon_mthd_query_signal(object, data, size); > + default: > + break; > + } > + return -EINVAL; > +} > + > +static struct nvkm_ofuncs > +nvkm_perfmon_ofuncs = { > + .ctor = _nvkm_object_ctor, > + .dtor = nvkm_object_destroy, > + .init = nvkm_object_init, > + .fini = nvkm_object_fini, > + .mthd = nvkm_perfmon_mthd, > +}; > + > +/**********************************************...

.../* 128KiB lpg */ + return 0; +} + +static int gk20a_fb_ctor(struct nouveau_object *parent, struct nouveau_object *engine, struct nouveau_oclass *oclass, void *data, u32 size, struct nouveau_object **pobject) @@ -48,7 +62,7 @@ gk20a_fb_oclass = &(struct nouveau_fb_impl) { .base.ofuncs = &(struct nouveau_ofuncs) { .ctor = gk20a_fb_ctor, .dtor = _nouveau_fb_dtor, - .init = _nouveau_fb_init, + .init = gk20a_fb_init, .fini = _nouveau_fb_fini, }, .memtype = nvc0_fb_memtype_valid, -- 2.1.3

...init(&priv->base.base); } +int +nv40_therm_init(struct nouveau_object *object) +{ + struct nouveau_therm *therm = (void *)object; + + nv40_sensor_setup(therm); + + return _nouveau_therm_init(object); +} + struct nouveau_oclass nv40_therm_oclass = { .handle = NV_SUBDEV(THERM, 0x40), .ofuncs = &(struct nouveau_ofuncs) { .ctor = nv40_therm_ctor, .dtor = _nouveau_therm_dtor, - .init = _nouveau_therm_init, + .init = nv40_therm_init, .fini = _nouveau_therm_fini, }, }; -- 1.8.1

...~0x10 */ + + nv_wr32(priv, 0x17e8d8, priv->part_nr); + if (nv_device(pfb)->card_type >= NV_E0) + nv_wr32(priv, 0x17e000, priv->part_nr); + + nv_wr32(priv, 0x17e8d4, priv->tag_base); + + return 0; +} + struct nouveau_oclass nvc0_ltcg_oclass = { .handle = NV_SUBDEV(LTCG, 0xc0), .ofuncs = &(struct nouveau_ofuncs) { .ctor = nvc0_ltcg_ctor, .dtor = nvc0_ltcg_dtor, - .init = _nouveau_ltcg_init, + .init = nvc0_ltcg_init, .fini = _nouveau_ltcg_fini, }, };

...SS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for > + * more details. > + * > + */ > + > +#include "nvc0.h" > + > +struct nouveau_oclass * > +nvea_fb_oclass = &(struct nouveau_fb_impl) { > + .base.handle = NV_SUBDEV(FB, 0xea), > + .base.ofuncs = &(struct nouveau_ofuncs) { > + .ctor = nvc0_fb_ctor, > + .dtor = nvc0_fb_dtor, > + .init = nvc0_fb_init, > + .fini = _nouveau_fb_fini, > + }, > + .memtype = nvc0_fb_memtype_valid, > + .ram = &nvea_ram_oclass, > +}.base; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau...

Hi Ahmad, What does that tool does besides what LLVM linker already does? I don't think my problem is in linking both modules, I think LLVM linker does the job for me, the issue is when changing the called function to call another function (in the example previously provided, to change it from foo2 to foo3, and adjusting the function parameter's references). Regards, Daniel Moya El

...bj *gpu_fw; > + void *vm_gpu_fw; > }; > > /******************************************************************************* > @@ -37,6 +41,7 @@ struct nv84_bsp_priv { > > static struct nouveau_oclass > nv84_bsp_sclass[] = { > + { 0x74b0, &nouveau_object_ofuncs }, > {}, > }; > > @@ -44,11 +49,28 @@ nv84_bsp_sclass[] = { > * BSP context > ******************************************************************************/ > > +static int > +nv84_bsp_engctx_ctor(struct nouveau_object *parent, > + stru...

...re/core/parent.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c index 1a48e58..d2ea7c2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/parent.c @@ -87,8 +87,10 @@ nouveau_parent_create_(struct nouveau_object *parent, if (sclass && sclass->ofuncs) { nclass = kzalloc(sizeof(*nclass), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!nclass) + if (!nclass) { + nouveau_parent_destroy(object); return -ENOMEM; + } nclass->sclass = object->sclass; object->sclass = nclass; -- 1.7.12

Thank you Ahmad, I figured out that, although the type of both p(oInst) and p(nInst) were the same, I had to: for (unsigned int i = 0; i < callOInst->getNumArgOperands(); i++) { callOInst->getArgOperand(i)->mutateType(callNInst->getArgOperand(i)->getType()); } that solves the issue at the calling instruction in the main function, but now I see that *linkModules* does not work

Dear LLVMer ; i'm trying to use LLVM for a specific target, using different memory banks. I have written the frontend to generate a valid IR and want to use the existing passes (as defined in tool opt) to optimize the code. The target has specific instructions, so following advices given in documentation, I created an intrinsic function, with attribute [IntrReadArgMem]. My test case is

Hello, This series exposes global performance counters (PCOUNTER) to the userspace through the nvif interface by reworking most of the code related to the PM engine. This interface will allow the userspace to control and monitor complex hardware events like the proprietary driver already does, for example with CUPTI and PerfKit. For now, this series only exposes performance counters on NV50,

...e implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for + * more details. + * + */ + +#include "nvc0.h" + +struct nouveau_oclass * +nvea_fb_oclass = &(struct nouveau_fb_impl) { + .base.handle = NV_SUBDEV(FB, 0xea), + .base.ofuncs = &(struct nouveau_ofuncs) { + .ctor = nvc0_fb_ctor, + .dtor = nvc0_fb_dtor, + .init = nvc0_fb_init, + .fini = _nouveau_fb_fini, + }, + .memtype = nvc0_fb_memtype_valid, + .ram = &nvea_ram_oclass, +}.base; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/priv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouv...