search for: offshoots

On Apr 3, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > On 4/2/07, Fabian Scheler <fabian.scheler at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello everybody, >> >> I'm curious whether there have been any attempts to perform >> performance analysis on the LLVA level. I am interested in the >> derivation of flow-facts (loop bounds etc. - what about the >>

Hi folks, I''ve written a little plugin to use for displaying a block of html over a page while fading out the background. This is like the lightbox.js library, and all it''s related offshoots (thickbox, greybox, etc.). My plugin, Redbox, is not really any better than these others (in fact, it''s less mature, and less tested), but it builds on prototype and scriptaculous, is available as a rails plugin, provides easy to use helpers, and unlike the other libraries, works very well...

Hi Nuno, The "right answer" for each function for a given input is determined by voting; any compiler whose output diagrees with the majority is considered to be wrong. So far, there is always a majority that agree on the answer. Rather than testing, I'd like to use an equivalence checker for object code. We're working on borrowing one, but don't have anything yet.

Hello everybody, I'm curious whether there have been any attempts to perform performance analysis on the LLVA level. I am interested in the derivation of flow-facts (loop bounds etc. - what about the value-range-propagation pass I read about on this list some time ago) but even more I am interested in exec-time modeling (how long does it take to execute a bunch of LLVA instructions on

On 4/2/07, Fabian Scheler <fabian.scheler at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I'm curious whether there have been any attempts to perform > performance analysis on the LLVA level. I am interested in the > derivation of flow-facts (loop bounds etc. - what about the > value-range-propagation pass I read about on this list some time ago) > but even more I am

> > LLVA specifically is refering to a research project offshoot of llvm. > > LLVM instructions do not have 1:1 mappings to native instructions > > (sometimes multiple llvm instructions map to fewer native insts, > > sometimes the other way around). > > That's correct, and furthermore, LLVA (now called SVA = Secure > Virtual Architecture) uses essentially the

Hi, I have just joined the list. I am the original creator of Puppy Linux, now letting other guys take the reins, and I am working on a fork of Puppy called Quirky Linux, where I try various experimental ideas. Up until now, in Puppy and all offshoots, we have used syslinux 4.05 or older. Over the last few days I have been testing 6.03 (using the binary DEBs from Ubuntu 14.10 Utopic Unicorn), and it works, except that the LSS boot image does not display. Everything is as we have been doing it for years. There is a syslinux.cfg, a boot message...

2009/3/27 Andre Tavares <andrelct at dcc.ufmg.br> > I'm a Computer Science master student at UFMG, Brasil. I'm interested in > taking part on Google Summer of Codes 2009. My idea is not on the LLVM list, > but I have written a project description to make my intentions clear. My > project is attached as a pdf file. By changing LLVM IR from SSA to SSI, you propose to

Dear LLVM Community, I'm a Computer Science master student at UFMG, Brasil. I'm interested in taking part on Google Summer of Codes 2009. My idea is not on the LLVM list, but I have written a project description to make my intentions clear. My project is attached as a pdf file. Regards, -- Andre Tavares Master Student in Computer Science - UFMG - Brasil http://dcc.ufmg.br/~andrelct

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.0.0-1 Severity: normal This is an offshoot of Bug#588888, but is really a separate issue. It appears that with hvmloader, the disk device names presented to the vm must by from a specific set that hvmloader knows how to emulate. Names like hd[a-c] and sd[a-c] work, but sr0 does not. While this makes sense, when you think about what hvmloader is doing, it is

Very interesting study! However as others have asked, I would like to see some aggregated data. Also, how do you verify that the generated code is correct? How are you systematically generating these tests? In summary, do you have any paper coming along? :) Thanks, Nuno ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Regehr" <regehr at cs.utah.edu> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing

2009/3/29 Misha Brukman <brukman at gmail.com>: > 2009/3/27 Andre Tavares <andrelct at dcc.ufmg.br> >> >> I'm a Computer Science master student at UFMG, Brasil. I'm interested in >> taking part on Google Summer of Codes 2009. My idea is not on the LLVM list, >> but I have written a project description to make my intentions clear. My >> project

Hi, A few comments from a fairly experienced R user who worked for several years on a R-based bioinformatics analysis framework. I don't want to misrepresent anyone's views, but... There are real disadvantages to the "objects-as-C-structs" and functions/methods which "mutate" based on argument type. i.e. S4. (1)Novices simply don't understand it.

thanks for the reply. On 08/23/2015 01:26 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 23/08/15 17:10, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> After years of delays and side trips, I really am going to dive in >> and build my own Samba server. And I have a few questions. >> >> All of my servers will be ARM. The main hardware will be Cubieboards >> (2 and truck). They will be running

After years of delays and side trips, I really am going to dive in and build my own Samba server. And I have a few questions. All of my servers will be ARM. The main hardware will be Cubieboards (2 and truck). They will be running Centos-7 once the development is finished. For now I am using Fedora 22 arm. My backup file server will be a pogoplug (armv5) with Redsleeve 7.1. My current

> Hi, > I have just joined the list. > > I am the original creator of Puppy Linux, now letting other guys take > the reins, and I am working on a fork of Puppy called Quirky Linux, > where I try various experimental ideas. > > Up until now, in Puppy and all offshoots, we have used syslinux 4.05 or older. > > Over the last few days I have been testing 6.03 (using the binary DEBs > from Ubuntu 14.10 Utopic Unicorn), and it works, except that the LSS > boot image does not display. > > Everything is as we have been doing it for years. There is a...

Hi, I am trying to create an rpm file from llvm.spec file included in llvm-1.5. For some reason, the DESTDIR argument to 'make install' is not working in this instance, and consequently, the rpm cannot be built. The relevant section of the spec file is as follows: --- %install rm -rf %{buildroot} make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} --- I have tried issuing this command by hand after the

I am using Samba 3.0.20pre1 as a DC and I want to know if there is something similar to Deep Freeze www.faronics.com (except open source) for Linux. Deep Freeze automatically compares the software installation on a client machine to an image on a server. If the client machine differs, the client is automatically synced with the server. I want to achieve this with Samba and a linux tool if

Hello, First of all sorry for my English. I am experiencing with Samba and I have a problem. I have an old server (OLD) with Red Hat 9 and Samba 2.2.7a that is working well. Now I try to start up a new server (NEW) with Red Hat Enterprise 4 and Samba 3.0.22. If I try to connect from NEW to itself by using smbclient I got the shared resources list correctly. If I try to connect to NEW from OLD,

On 23/08/15 17:10, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > After years of delays and side trips, I really am going to dive in and > build my own Samba server. And I have a few questions. > > All of my servers will be ARM. The main hardware will be Cubieboards > (2 and truck). They will be running Centos-7 once the development is > finished. For now I am using Fedora 22 arm. My backup