search for: offseti

To constraint the movement to a specific area, I added the following lines in dragdrop.js This will allow you to specify: area: [2,3,100,120] to draw a rectangular area where movement is allowed... might have very strange side effects, just needed a quick/dirty hack. Plus I installed script.aculo.us just 10 minutes ago :) Don''t flame pls. Manuele line:202 (please note the ","

Hi all, this is a patch for 1.5_rc5 I noticed that I was not able to drag stuff out of scrolling divs. When I tried to drag it out, the draggable would remain in that div and the scrollbars would adapt to the bigger content of the div. This patch extends draggable with an option :tofront. When it is set to true, the draggable will be moved to the document body while keeping its position on the

Is it possible to call the super class''s version of a function from a subclass? SuperClass = Class.create(); SuperClass.prototype = { initialize: function(){ this.varA = ''''; this.varB = ''''; } } SubClass = Class.create(); SubClass.prototype = (new SuperClass()).extend({ initialize: function(somevar) { this.somevar = somevar; }

Hi Gordon, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > Nicholas, > > I guess you're trying to solve the fragile base-class problem by > deferring field offset calculations until JIT compilation time? > > No. I'm deferring field offset calculation until /execution /time. > Perhaps I'm missing something, but can't you accomplish this by using > external constants in

Hi list, how can I set the top and left CSS properties for draggable divs? When I modify the properties directly, the DIV jumps to its old position when I start to drag it. Thanks in advance! Martin _________________________________________________________________________ Mit der Gruppen-SMS von WEB.DE FreeMail k?nnen Sie eine SMS an alle Freunde gleichzeitig schicken:

Nicholas, I guess you're trying to solve the fragile base-class problem by deferring field offset calculations until JIT compilation time? Perhaps I'm missing something, but can't you accomplish this by using external constants in the source program, to be supplied at JIT/link time? external constant i32 @obj.x.offs; external constant i32 @obj.y.offs; define

Hi everyone, I would like to implement an equivalent mechanism of function callbacks in the JIT, but for fields. Typically in Java, when you compile a method, there may be some instructions (getfield, putfield) that depend on a type which is not yet resolved. I think the best way to do this in LLVM is to add an intrinsic. The intrinsic would be only valid if we jit, and would be lowered only in