search for: offset_imm

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "offset_imm".

2008 May 01
3
[LLVMdev] building cross llvm-gcc for new target
...ngoing churn there. I'm doing something dumb, and I need to figure out what. I get errors trying to build from crtbegin.o, and they look like this (replacing the long temporary filename with $TMPFILE): > $TMPFILE: Assembler messages: > $TMPFILE:66: Error: internal_relocation (type: OFFSET_IMM) not fixed > up > $TMPFILE:71: Error: internal_relocation (type: OFFSET_IMM) not fixed > up > $TMPFILE:76: Error: internal_relocation (type: OFFSET_IMM) not fixed > up > $TMPFILE:87: Error: internal_relocation (type: OFFSET_IMM) not fixed > up > $TMPFILE:91: Error: i...
2011 Jun 22
0
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs
...dy have support for lots of the changes necessary to handle llvm assembly. Let's cross our fingers that's the case. At this point I will be happy to have ARMv5 assembly working, and seems that this issue is only show-stopper so far. I also had problem with "internal_relocation (type: OFFSET_IMM) not fixed up" errors while compiling libcsu, but I fixed that with passing -O1 to clang. > > > > Does your assembler support the other shift mnemonics (e.g., "LSL")? This will change the output for all of them. Yes, it works for other shift mnemonics. Verified...
2008 May 01
0
[LLVMdev] building cross llvm-gcc for new target
On Apr 30, 2008, at 11:19 PM, james woodyatt wrote: >> $TMPFILE:66: Error: internal_relocation (type: OFFSET_IMM) not >> fixed up You need to run the compile with -save-temps and then look at the .s file. If you like it, it is an assembler bug. If you don't like it, it is a bug in the compiler. If you don't know if you like it, as your assembler vendor (binutils) if it is valid. Of...
2011 Jun 22
2
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs
On Jun 22, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Damjan Marion wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2011, at 6:15 PM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > >> >> On Jun 22, 2011, at 9:00 AM, Renato Golin wrote: >> >>> On 22 June 2011 16:50, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >>>>> This sounds like a dead end as newer binutils are GPLv3. >>>> >>>> Yeah,