Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "offset_high".
2020 Jul 14
0
[PATCH v4 29/75] x86/idt: Move two function from k/idt.c to i/a/desc.h
...desc(gate_desc *gate, const struct idt_data *d)
+{
+ unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) d->addr;
+
+ gate->offset_low = (u16) addr;
+ gate->segment = (u16) d->segment;
+ gate->bits = d->bits;
+ gate->offset_middle = (u16) (addr >> 16);
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ gate->offset_high = (u32) (addr >> 32);
+ gate->reserved = 0;
+#endif
+}
+
extern unsigned long system_vectors[];
extern void load_current_idt(void);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/desc_defs.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/desc_defs.h
index 5621fb3f2d1a..f7e7099af595 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/desc_...
2012 Jul 27
1
[PATCH] nvc0: Add and enable vblank support
Based on the original patch by Christoph Bumiller, but since
it depends on kernel support patched I cannot push it yet.
The changes are that I enable vblank by default, and offset
takes OFFSET_HIGH/LOW instead of something relative to notifier_bo.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com>
---
diff --git a/man/nouveau.man b/man/nouveau.man
index 7c72907..8765569 100644
--- a/man/nouveau.man
+++ b/man/nouveau.man
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Enable or disable wfb, only...
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 07/17] paravirt_ops - descriptor changes.
...PTR_MIDDLE(x) (((unsigned long)(x) >> 16) & 0xFFFF)
#define PTR_HIGH(x) ((unsigned long)(x) >> 32)
+#define DESC_ADDRESS(d) ((unsigned long)((unsigned long)d.base2 << 32) \
+ | (d.base1 << 16) | d.base0)
+
+#define GATE_ADDRESS(g) ((unsigned long)((unsigned long)g.offset_high << 32) \
+ | (g.offset_middle << 16) | g.offset_low)
enum {
DESC_TSS = 0x9,
DESC_LDT = 0x2,
--
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 07/17] paravirt_ops - descriptor changes.
...PTR_MIDDLE(x) (((unsigned long)(x) >> 16) & 0xFFFF)
#define PTR_HIGH(x) ((unsigned long)(x) >> 32)
+#define DESC_ADDRESS(d) ((unsigned long)((unsigned long)d.base2 << 32) \
+ | (d.base1 << 16) | d.base0)
+
+#define GATE_ADDRESS(g) ((unsigned long)((unsigned long)g.offset_high << 32) \
+ | (g.offset_middle << 16) | g.offset_low)
enum {
DESC_TSS = 0x9,
DESC_LDT = 0x2,
--
2020 Feb 11
1
[PATCH 08/62] x86/boot/compressed/64: Add IDT Infrastructure
...L_CS;
> + entry.bits.type = GATE_TRAP;
^^^
I realize we're not running a real kernel here, but GATE_TRAP is
madness. Please use GATE_INTERRUPT.
> + entry.bits.p = 1;
> + entry.offset_middle = (u16)((address >> 16) & 0xffff);
> + entry.offset_high = (u32)(address >> 32);
> +
> + memcpy(&boot_idt[vector], &entry, sizeof(entry));
> +}
> +
> +/* Have this here so we don't need to include <asm/desc.h> */
> +static void load_boot_idt(const struct desc_ptr *dtr)
> +{
> + asm volatile(&q...
2020 Apr 28
0
[PATCH v3 13/75] x86/boot/compressed/64: Add IDT Infrastructure
...)handler;
+ gate_desc entry;
+
+ memset(&entry, 0, sizeof(entry));
+
+ entry.offset_low = (u16)(address & 0xffff);
+ entry.segment = __KERNEL_CS;
+ entry.bits.type = GATE_TRAP;
+ entry.bits.p = 1;
+ entry.offset_middle = (u16)((address >> 16) & 0xffff);
+ entry.offset_high = (u32)(address >> 32);
+
+ memcpy(&boot_idt[vector], &entry, sizeof(entry));
+}
+
+/* Have this here so we don't need to include <asm/desc.h> */
+static void load_boot_idt(const struct desc_ptr *dtr)
+{
+ asm volatile("lidt %0"::"m" (*dtr));
+}
+
+/* S...
2020 Feb 11
0
[PATCH 08/62] x86/boot/compressed/64: Add IDT Infrastructure
...)handler;
+ gate_desc entry;
+
+ memset(&entry, 0, sizeof(entry));
+
+ entry.offset_low = (u16)(address & 0xffff);
+ entry.segment = __KERNEL_CS;
+ entry.bits.type = GATE_TRAP;
+ entry.bits.p = 1;
+ entry.offset_middle = (u16)((address >> 16) & 0xffff);
+ entry.offset_high = (u32)(address >> 32);
+
+ memcpy(&boot_idt[vector], &entry, sizeof(entry));
+}
+
+/* Have this here so we don't need to include <asm/desc.h> */
+static void load_boot_idt(const struct desc_ptr *dtr)
+{
+ asm volatile("lidt %0"::"m" (*dtr));
+}
+
+/* S...
2020 Jul 14
92
[PATCH v4 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
Hi,
here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I
addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and
rebased the code v5.8-rc5.
The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the
#VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big
pile of entry code changes merged into
2020 Jul 14
92
[PATCH v4 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
Hi,
here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I
addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and
rebased the code v5.8-rc5.
The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the
#VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big
pile of entry code changes merged into
2020 Sep 07
84
[PATCH v7 00/72] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
Hi,
here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The
previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/
I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the
discussions around it.
Another important change is that the early IDT
2020 Sep 07
84
[PATCH v7 00/72] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
Hi,
here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The
previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/
I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the
discussions around it.
Another important change is that the early IDT
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC/PATCH LGUEST X86_64 03/13] lguest64 core
...he hypervisor from needing any data sections,
+ * we need to hard code the difference between what the hypervisor
+ * may put into the GS base, and what we let the guest put in.
+ * We allow the guest to put in "Kernel addresses" to simplify
+ * the guest PDA code.
+ */
+#define LGUEST_HV_OFFSET_HIGH 0xffffffff
+#define LGUEST_HV_OFFSET_LOW 0xff000000
+
+#define LGUEST_NMI_IST 7
+
+#define LGUEST_MAGIC 0x6c6775657374 /* "lguest" */
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+#include <asm/lguest.h>
+
+extern void switch_to_guest(struct lguest_vcpu *);
+extern unsigned long hcall_teste;
+extern un...
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC/PATCH LGUEST X86_64 03/13] lguest64 core
...he hypervisor from needing any data sections,
+ * we need to hard code the difference between what the hypervisor
+ * may put into the GS base, and what we let the guest put in.
+ * We allow the guest to put in "Kernel addresses" to simplify
+ * the guest PDA code.
+ */
+#define LGUEST_HV_OFFSET_HIGH 0xffffffff
+#define LGUEST_HV_OFFSET_LOW 0xff000000
+
+#define LGUEST_NMI_IST 7
+
+#define LGUEST_MAGIC 0x6c6775657374 /* "lguest" */
+
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+#include <asm/lguest.h>
+
+extern void switch_to_guest(struct lguest_vcpu *);
+extern unsigned long hcall_teste;
+extern un...
2020 Feb 11
83
[RFC PATCH 00/62] Linux as SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi,
here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run
under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete,
but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the
size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial
feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code
here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.
2020 Feb 11
83
[RFC PATCH 00/62] Linux as SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi,
here is the first public post of the patch-set to enable Linux to run
under SEV-ES enabled hypervisors. The code is mostly feature-complete,
but there are still a couple of bugs to fix. Nevertheless, given the
size of the patch-set, I think it is about time to ask for initial
feedback of the changes that come with it. To better understand the code
here is a quick explanation of SEV-ES first.
2020 Apr 28
116
[PATCH v3 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi,
here is the next version of changes to enable Linux to run as an SEV-ES
guest. The code was rebased to v5.7-rc3 and got a fair number of changes
since the last version.
What is SEV-ES
==============
SEV-ES is an acronym for 'Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted
State' and means a hardware feature of AMD processors which hides the
register state of VCPUs to the hypervisor by
2020 Apr 28
116
[PATCH v3 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi,
here is the next version of changes to enable Linux to run as an SEV-ES
guest. The code was rebased to v5.7-rc3 and got a fair number of changes
since the last version.
What is SEV-ES
==============
SEV-ES is an acronym for 'Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted
State' and means a hardware feature of AMD processors which hides the
register state of VCPUs to the hypervisor by
2020 Jul 24
86
[PATCH v5 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
Hi,
here is a rebased version of the latest SEV-ES patches. They are now
based on latest tip/master instead of upstream Linux and include the
necessary changes.
Changes to v4 are in particular:
- Moved early IDT setup code to idt.c, because the idt_descr
and the idt_table are now static
- This required to make stack protector work early (or
2020 Aug 24
96
[PATCH v6 00/76] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
Hi,
here is the new version of the SEV-ES client enabling patch-set. It is
based on the latest tip/master branch and contains the necessary
changes. In particular those ar:
- Enabling CR4.FSGSBASE early on supported processors so that
early #VC exceptions on APs can be handled.
- Add another patch (patch 1) to fix a KVM frame-size build