Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5507 matches for "offlining".
2002 Feb 08
4
offline folders problem with W2k SP2
Hi,
had samba 2.1.?? version and Win2k running for some time and
offline folders worked just fine. But recently I installed
SP2 on Win2k and did a samba upgrade to 2.2.3 and now the
offline folders do not work any more. Everything is fine
until I go offline, */CSC/ contains my offline files and
everything seems fine, but when being offline I always get
access denied messages when accessing
2019 Oct 16
4
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
...mory blocks. The important part is that PageOffline() has
> to remain set until the section is offline, so these pages will never
> get accessed (e.g., when dumping). The pages should not be handed
> back to the buddy (which would require clearing PageOffline() and
> result in issues if offlining fails and the pages are suddenly in the
> buddy).
>
> Let's use "PageOffline() + reference count = 0" as a sign to
> memory offlining code that these pages can simply be skipped when
> offlining, similar to free or HWPoison pages.
>
> Pass flags to test_pages_is...
2019 Oct 16
4
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
...mory blocks. The important part is that PageOffline() has
> to remain set until the section is offline, so these pages will never
> get accessed (e.g., when dumping). The pages should not be handed
> back to the buddy (which would require clearing PageOffline() and
> result in issues if offlining fails and the pages are suddenly in the
> buddy).
>
> Let's use "PageOffline() + reference count = 0" as a sign to
> memory offlining code that these pages can simply be skipped when
> offlining, similar to free or HWPoison pages.
>
> Pass flags to test_pages_is...
2019 Oct 16
3
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
...PageOffline() has
> > > to remain set until the section is offline, so these pages will never
> > > get accessed (e.g., when dumping). The pages should not be handed
> > > back to the buddy (which would require clearing PageOffline() and
> > > result in issues if offlining fails and the pages are suddenly in the
> > > buddy).
> > >
> > > Let's use "PageOffline() + reference count = 0" as a sign to
> > > memory offlining code that these pages can simply be skipped when
> > > offlining, similar to free or HWPo...
2019 Oct 16
3
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
...PageOffline() has
> > > to remain set until the section is offline, so these pages will never
> > > get accessed (e.g., when dumping). The pages should not be handed
> > > back to the buddy (which would require clearing PageOffline() and
> > > result in issues if offlining fails and the pages are suddenly in the
> > > buddy).
> > >
> > > Let's use "PageOffline() + reference count = 0" as a sign to
> > > memory offlining code that these pages can simply be skipped when
> > > offlining, similar to free or HWPo...
2019 Oct 18
2
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when
> > offlining the page)? In other words as long as the driver knows the page
> > has been returned to the host then it has ref count at 1. Once the page
> > is returned to the guest for whatever reason it can free it to the
> > system by clearing the offline state and put_page.
>
> I thi...
2019 Oct 18
2
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when
> > offlining the page)? In other words as long as the driver knows the page
> > has been returned to the host then it has ref count at 1. Once the page
> > is returned to the guest for whatever reason it can free it to the
> > system by clearing the offline state and put_page.
>
> I thi...
2019 Oct 16
2
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
...PageOffline() has
> > > to remain set until the section is offline, so these pages will never
> > > get accessed (e.g., when dumping). The pages should not be handed
> > > back to the buddy (which would require clearing PageOffline() and
> > > result in issues if offlining fails and the pages are suddenly in the
> > > buddy).
> > >
> > > Let's use "PageOffline() + reference count = 0" as a sign to
> > > memory offlining code that these pages can simply be skipped when
> > > offlining, similar to free or HWPo...
2019 Oct 16
2
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
...PageOffline() has
> > > to remain set until the section is offline, so these pages will never
> > > get accessed (e.g., when dumping). The pages should not be handed
> > > back to the buddy (which would require clearing PageOffline() and
> > > result in issues if offlining fails and the pages are suddenly in the
> > > buddy).
> > >
> > > Let's use "PageOffline() + reference count = 0" as a sign to
> > > memory offlining code that these pages can simply be skipped when
> > > offlining, similar to free or HWPo...
2019 Oct 18
0
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
>>> But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when
>>> offlining the page)? In other words as long as the driver knows the page
>>> has been returned to the host then it has ref count at 1. Once the page
>>> is returned to the guest for whatever reason it can free it to the
>>> system by clearing the offline state and put_page.
>>...
2019 Oct 16
0
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
...ine() has
>>>> to remain set until the section is offline, so these pages will never
>>>> get accessed (e.g., when dumping). The pages should not be handed
>>>> back to the buddy (which would require clearing PageOffline() and
>>>> result in issues if offlining fails and the pages are suddenly in the
>>>> buddy).
>>>>
>>>> Let's use "PageOffline() + reference count = 0" as a sign to
>>>> memory offlining code that these pages can simply be skipped when
>>>> offlining, similar to fre...
2019 Oct 16
0
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
...important part is that PageOffline() has
>> to remain set until the section is offline, so these pages will never
>> get accessed (e.g., when dumping). The pages should not be handed
>> back to the buddy (which would require clearing PageOffline() and
>> result in issues if offlining fails and the pages are suddenly in the
>> buddy).
>>
>> Let's use "PageOffline() + reference count = 0" as a sign to
>> memory offlining code that these pages can simply be skipped when
>> offlining, similar to free or HWPoison pages.
>>
>> P...
2006 May 06
2
Bug#366216: vif-bridge: offlining the interface fails because interface already offline
Package: xen-utils-3.0
Version: 3.0.2+hg9656-1
Severity: normal
My setup is a basic one. No changes to the /etc/xen/* files.
Network in a domU works perfectly fine.
But, after shutdowning a domU, I can see the following lines in
/var/log/debug:
May 6 10:31:45 vaio logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: offline XENBUS_PATH=backend/vif/18/0
May 6 10:31:46 vaio logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge:
2010 Oct 19
1
Windows 7 Offline Files (CSC) not syncing from Samba 3.4.0 PDC
Hi All,
I've been running a Samba 3.4.0 on Ubuntu 9.10 for over a year at a
friend's office and it has been extremely stable. But I've suddenly hit a
scenario where Windows 7 clients can no longer properly sync the main
share as 'Offline Files'
I found it highly unreliable under Vista Business, then Win7Pro seemed to
work much better; but suddenly I am finding that
2019 Oct 18
2
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
...ildenbrand wrote:
> On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when
> > > > offlining the page)? In other words as long as the driver knows the page
> > > > has been returned to the host then it has ref count at 1. Once the page
> > > > is returned to the guest for whatever reason it can free it to the
> > > > system by clearing the offline state...
2019 Oct 18
2
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
...ildenbrand wrote:
> On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 16-10-19 16:14:52, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 16.10.19 16:03, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > But why cannot you keep the reference count at 1 (do get_page when
> > > > offlining the page)? In other words as long as the driver knows the page
> > > > has been returned to the host then it has ref count at 1. Once the page
> > > > is returned to the guest for whatever reason it can free it to the
> > > > system by clearing the offline state...
2019 Oct 16
0
[PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
...ine() has
>>>> to remain set until the section is offline, so these pages will never
>>>> get accessed (e.g., when dumping). The pages should not be handed
>>>> back to the buddy (which would require clearing PageOffline() and
>>>> result in issues if offlining fails and the pages are suddenly in the
>>>> buddy).
>>>>
>>>> Let's use "PageOffline() + reference count = 0" as a sign to
>>>> memory offlining code that these pages can simply be skipped when
>>>> offlining, similar to fre...
2020 Mar 10
1
[PATCH v1 06/11] mm: Allow to offline unmovable PageOffline() pages via MEM_GOING_OFFLINE
...mory blocks. The important part
> is that PageOffline() has to remain set until the section is offline, so
> these pages will never get accessed (e.g., when dumping). The pages should
> not be handed back to the buddy (which would require clearing PageOffline()
> and result in issues if offlining fails and the pages are suddenly in the
> buddy).
>
> Let's allow to do that by allowing to isolate any PageOffline() page
> when offlining. This way, we can reach the memory hotplug notifier
> MEM_GOING_OFFLINE, where the driver can signal that he is fine with
> offlining th...
2008 Dec 15
8
[PATCH 0/2] MCA support with page offlining
Hi all,
I had posted about MCA support for Intel64 before. It had only a
function to log the MCA error data received from hypervisor.
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-09/msg00876.html
I attach patches that support not only error logging but also Page
Offlining function. The page where an MCA occurs will offline and not
reuse. A new flag ''PGC_reserved'' was added in page count_info to mark
the impacted page.
I know that it is better to implement the page offlining for general
purpose, but I implemented for MCA specialized in this first s...
2019 Oct 16
1
[PATCH RFC v3 8/9] mm/memory_hotplug: Introduce offline_and_remove_memory()
..., David Hildenbrand wrote:
> virtio-mem wants to offline and remove a memory block once it unplugged
> all subblocks (e.g., using alloc_contig_range()). Let's provide
> an interface to do that from a driver. virtio-mem already supports to
> offline partially unplugged memory blocks. Offlining a fully unplugged
> memory block will not require to migrate any pages. All unplugged
> subblocks are PageOffline() and have a reference count of 0 - so
> offlining code will simply skip them.
>
> All we need an interface to trigger the "offlining" and the removing in a
&g...